Cargando…
Outcomes of implant-based oral rehabilitation in head and neck oncology patients—a retrospective evaluation of a large, single regional service cohort
BACKGROUND: The study reports on implant survival outcomes in head and neck cancer patients who received implant-based oral rehabilitation in a regional service centre. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of implant survival outcomes in patients treated in a regional service from 2012 to 2017 was perf...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399356/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30834461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-019-0161-y |
_version_ | 1783399744467369984 |
---|---|
author | Laverty, Dominic P. Addison, Owen Wubie, Berhanu A. Heo, Giseon Parmar, Sat Martin, Timothy Praveen, Prav Pearson, David Newsum, David Murphy, Michael Bateman, Geoffrey |
author_facet | Laverty, Dominic P. Addison, Owen Wubie, Berhanu A. Heo, Giseon Parmar, Sat Martin, Timothy Praveen, Prav Pearson, David Newsum, David Murphy, Michael Bateman, Geoffrey |
author_sort | Laverty, Dominic P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The study reports on implant survival outcomes in head and neck cancer patients who received implant-based oral rehabilitation in a regional service centre. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of implant survival outcomes in patients treated in a regional service from 2012 to 2017 was performed. The primary outcome measure was implant survival. The secondary outcome measure was to assess the effect of covariates associated with implant failure including bone type, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, gender and surgical implant complications. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were applied to compare differences in the survival rates of groups of variables. Cox proportional hazards models were applied to identify covariates associated with implant failure. p value was set at 0.05. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 167 head and neck cancer patients who had 779 dental implants placed. Implant survival estimates were calculated: 3 years, 95.7% [95%CI 94.3–97.2%] and 5 years, 95.5% [95%CI 93.9–97.0%], with a median follow-up of 38 months. Gender (p = 0.09), radiotherapy (p = 0.16) and chemotherapy (p = 0.17) did not significantly influence implant survival, whereas implant failure was higher in transported (reconstructed) bone sites in comparison with native bone (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The result of this study suggests that overall implant survival as part of the routine oral rehabilitation is high in this patient cohort; however, implant failure was found to be statistically higher for implant placed into transported bone in comparison to native bone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6399356 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63993562019-03-22 Outcomes of implant-based oral rehabilitation in head and neck oncology patients—a retrospective evaluation of a large, single regional service cohort Laverty, Dominic P. Addison, Owen Wubie, Berhanu A. Heo, Giseon Parmar, Sat Martin, Timothy Praveen, Prav Pearson, David Newsum, David Murphy, Michael Bateman, Geoffrey Int J Implant Dent Research BACKGROUND: The study reports on implant survival outcomes in head and neck cancer patients who received implant-based oral rehabilitation in a regional service centre. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of implant survival outcomes in patients treated in a regional service from 2012 to 2017 was performed. The primary outcome measure was implant survival. The secondary outcome measure was to assess the effect of covariates associated with implant failure including bone type, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, gender and surgical implant complications. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were applied to compare differences in the survival rates of groups of variables. Cox proportional hazards models were applied to identify covariates associated with implant failure. p value was set at 0.05. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 167 head and neck cancer patients who had 779 dental implants placed. Implant survival estimates were calculated: 3 years, 95.7% [95%CI 94.3–97.2%] and 5 years, 95.5% [95%CI 93.9–97.0%], with a median follow-up of 38 months. Gender (p = 0.09), radiotherapy (p = 0.16) and chemotherapy (p = 0.17) did not significantly influence implant survival, whereas implant failure was higher in transported (reconstructed) bone sites in comparison with native bone (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The result of this study suggests that overall implant survival as part of the routine oral rehabilitation is high in this patient cohort; however, implant failure was found to be statistically higher for implant placed into transported bone in comparison to native bone. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6399356/ /pubmed/30834461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-019-0161-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Laverty, Dominic P. Addison, Owen Wubie, Berhanu A. Heo, Giseon Parmar, Sat Martin, Timothy Praveen, Prav Pearson, David Newsum, David Murphy, Michael Bateman, Geoffrey Outcomes of implant-based oral rehabilitation in head and neck oncology patients—a retrospective evaluation of a large, single regional service cohort |
title | Outcomes of implant-based oral rehabilitation in head and neck oncology patients—a retrospective evaluation of a large, single regional service cohort |
title_full | Outcomes of implant-based oral rehabilitation in head and neck oncology patients—a retrospective evaluation of a large, single regional service cohort |
title_fullStr | Outcomes of implant-based oral rehabilitation in head and neck oncology patients—a retrospective evaluation of a large, single regional service cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes of implant-based oral rehabilitation in head and neck oncology patients—a retrospective evaluation of a large, single regional service cohort |
title_short | Outcomes of implant-based oral rehabilitation in head and neck oncology patients—a retrospective evaluation of a large, single regional service cohort |
title_sort | outcomes of implant-based oral rehabilitation in head and neck oncology patients—a retrospective evaluation of a large, single regional service cohort |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399356/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30834461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-019-0161-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lavertydominicp outcomesofimplantbasedoralrehabilitationinheadandneckoncologypatientsaretrospectiveevaluationofalargesingleregionalservicecohort AT addisonowen outcomesofimplantbasedoralrehabilitationinheadandneckoncologypatientsaretrospectiveevaluationofalargesingleregionalservicecohort AT wubieberhanua outcomesofimplantbasedoralrehabilitationinheadandneckoncologypatientsaretrospectiveevaluationofalargesingleregionalservicecohort AT heogiseon outcomesofimplantbasedoralrehabilitationinheadandneckoncologypatientsaretrospectiveevaluationofalargesingleregionalservicecohort AT parmarsat outcomesofimplantbasedoralrehabilitationinheadandneckoncologypatientsaretrospectiveevaluationofalargesingleregionalservicecohort AT martintimothy outcomesofimplantbasedoralrehabilitationinheadandneckoncologypatientsaretrospectiveevaluationofalargesingleregionalservicecohort AT praveenprav outcomesofimplantbasedoralrehabilitationinheadandneckoncologypatientsaretrospectiveevaluationofalargesingleregionalservicecohort AT pearsondavid outcomesofimplantbasedoralrehabilitationinheadandneckoncologypatientsaretrospectiveevaluationofalargesingleregionalservicecohort AT newsumdavid outcomesofimplantbasedoralrehabilitationinheadandneckoncologypatientsaretrospectiveevaluationofalargesingleregionalservicecohort AT murphymichael outcomesofimplantbasedoralrehabilitationinheadandneckoncologypatientsaretrospectiveevaluationofalargesingleregionalservicecohort AT batemangeoffrey outcomesofimplantbasedoralrehabilitationinheadandneckoncologypatientsaretrospectiveevaluationofalargesingleregionalservicecohort |