Cargando…

Novel Approach to Inpatient Fall Risk Prediction and Its Cross-Site Validation Using Time-Variant Data

BACKGROUND: Electronic medical records (EMRs) contain a considerable amount of information about patients. The rapid adoption of EMRs and the integration of nursing data into clinical repositories have made large quantities of clinical data available for both clinical practice and research. OBJECTIV...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Insook, Boo, Eun-Hee, Chung, Eunja, Bates, David W, Dykes, Patricia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30777849
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/11505
_version_ 1783399786545676288
author Cho, Insook
Boo, Eun-Hee
Chung, Eunja
Bates, David W
Dykes, Patricia
author_facet Cho, Insook
Boo, Eun-Hee
Chung, Eunja
Bates, David W
Dykes, Patricia
author_sort Cho, Insook
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Electronic medical records (EMRs) contain a considerable amount of information about patients. The rapid adoption of EMRs and the integration of nursing data into clinical repositories have made large quantities of clinical data available for both clinical practice and research. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to investigate whether readily available longitudinal EMR data including nursing records could be utilized to compute the risk of inpatient falls and to assess their accuracy compared with existing fall risk assessment tools. METHODS: We used 2 study cohorts from 2 tertiary hospitals, located near Seoul, South Korea, with different EMR systems. The modeling cohort included 14,307 admissions (122,179 hospital days), and the validation cohort comprised 21,172 admissions (175,592 hospital days) from each of 6 nursing units. A probabilistic Bayesian network model was used, and patient data were divided into windows with a length of 24 hours. In addition, data on existing fall risk assessment tools, nursing processes, Korean Patient Classification System groups, and medications and administration data were used as model parameters. Model evaluation metrics were averaged using 10-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: The initial model showed an error rate of 11.7% and a spherical payoff of 0.91 with a c-statistic of 0.96, which represent far superior performance compared with that for the existing fall risk assessment tool (c-statistic=0.69). The cross-site validation revealed an error rate of 4.87% and a spherical payoff of 0.96 with a c-statistic of 0.99 compared with a c-statistic of 0.65 for the existing fall risk assessment tool. The calibration curves for the model displayed more reliable results than those for the fall risk assessment tools alone. In addition, nursing intervention data showed potential contributions to reducing the variance in the fall rate as did the risk factors of individual patients. CONCLUSIONS: A risk prediction model that considers longitudinal EMR data including nursing interventions can improve the ability to identify individual patients likely to fall.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6399571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63995712019-03-29 Novel Approach to Inpatient Fall Risk Prediction and Its Cross-Site Validation Using Time-Variant Data Cho, Insook Boo, Eun-Hee Chung, Eunja Bates, David W Dykes, Patricia J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Electronic medical records (EMRs) contain a considerable amount of information about patients. The rapid adoption of EMRs and the integration of nursing data into clinical repositories have made large quantities of clinical data available for both clinical practice and research. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to investigate whether readily available longitudinal EMR data including nursing records could be utilized to compute the risk of inpatient falls and to assess their accuracy compared with existing fall risk assessment tools. METHODS: We used 2 study cohorts from 2 tertiary hospitals, located near Seoul, South Korea, with different EMR systems. The modeling cohort included 14,307 admissions (122,179 hospital days), and the validation cohort comprised 21,172 admissions (175,592 hospital days) from each of 6 nursing units. A probabilistic Bayesian network model was used, and patient data were divided into windows with a length of 24 hours. In addition, data on existing fall risk assessment tools, nursing processes, Korean Patient Classification System groups, and medications and administration data were used as model parameters. Model evaluation metrics were averaged using 10-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: The initial model showed an error rate of 11.7% and a spherical payoff of 0.91 with a c-statistic of 0.96, which represent far superior performance compared with that for the existing fall risk assessment tool (c-statistic=0.69). The cross-site validation revealed an error rate of 4.87% and a spherical payoff of 0.96 with a c-statistic of 0.99 compared with a c-statistic of 0.65 for the existing fall risk assessment tool. The calibration curves for the model displayed more reliable results than those for the fall risk assessment tools alone. In addition, nursing intervention data showed potential contributions to reducing the variance in the fall rate as did the risk factors of individual patients. CONCLUSIONS: A risk prediction model that considers longitudinal EMR data including nursing interventions can improve the ability to identify individual patients likely to fall. JMIR Publications 2019-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6399571/ /pubmed/30777849 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/11505 Text en ©Insook Cho, Eun-Hee Boo, Eunja Chung, David W. Bates, Patricia Dykes. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 19.02.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Cho, Insook
Boo, Eun-Hee
Chung, Eunja
Bates, David W
Dykes, Patricia
Novel Approach to Inpatient Fall Risk Prediction and Its Cross-Site Validation Using Time-Variant Data
title Novel Approach to Inpatient Fall Risk Prediction and Its Cross-Site Validation Using Time-Variant Data
title_full Novel Approach to Inpatient Fall Risk Prediction and Its Cross-Site Validation Using Time-Variant Data
title_fullStr Novel Approach to Inpatient Fall Risk Prediction and Its Cross-Site Validation Using Time-Variant Data
title_full_unstemmed Novel Approach to Inpatient Fall Risk Prediction and Its Cross-Site Validation Using Time-Variant Data
title_short Novel Approach to Inpatient Fall Risk Prediction and Its Cross-Site Validation Using Time-Variant Data
title_sort novel approach to inpatient fall risk prediction and its cross-site validation using time-variant data
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30777849
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/11505
work_keys_str_mv AT choinsook novelapproachtoinpatientfallriskpredictionanditscrosssitevalidationusingtimevariantdata
AT booeunhee novelapproachtoinpatientfallriskpredictionanditscrosssitevalidationusingtimevariantdata
AT chungeunja novelapproachtoinpatientfallriskpredictionanditscrosssitevalidationusingtimevariantdata
AT batesdavidw novelapproachtoinpatientfallriskpredictionanditscrosssitevalidationusingtimevariantdata
AT dykespatricia novelapproachtoinpatientfallriskpredictionanditscrosssitevalidationusingtimevariantdata