Cargando…
Personalized medicine with IgGAM compared with standard of care for treatment of peritonitis after infectious source control (the PEPPER trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Peritonitis is responsible for thousands of deaths annually in Germany alone. Even source control (SC) and antibiotic treatment often fail to prevent severe sepsis or septic shock, and this situation has hardly improved in the past two decades. Most experimental immunomodulatory therapeu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30832742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3244-4 |
_version_ | 1783399826274123776 |
---|---|
author | Kalvelage, Christina Zacharowski, Kai Bauhofer, Artur Gockel, Ulrich Adamzik, Michael Nierhaus, Axel Kujath, Peter Eckmann, Christian Pletz, Mathias W. Bracht, Hendrik Simon, Tim-Philipp Winkler, Michael Kindgen-Milles, Detlef Albertsmeier, Markus Weigand, Markus Ellger, Björn Ragaller, Maximilian Ullrich, Roman Marx, Gernot |
author_facet | Kalvelage, Christina Zacharowski, Kai Bauhofer, Artur Gockel, Ulrich Adamzik, Michael Nierhaus, Axel Kujath, Peter Eckmann, Christian Pletz, Mathias W. Bracht, Hendrik Simon, Tim-Philipp Winkler, Michael Kindgen-Milles, Detlef Albertsmeier, Markus Weigand, Markus Ellger, Björn Ragaller, Maximilian Ullrich, Roman Marx, Gernot |
author_sort | Kalvelage, Christina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Peritonitis is responsible for thousands of deaths annually in Germany alone. Even source control (SC) and antibiotic treatment often fail to prevent severe sepsis or septic shock, and this situation has hardly improved in the past two decades. Most experimental immunomodulatory therapeutics for sepsis have been aimed at blocking or dampening a specific pro-inflammatory immunological mediator. However, the patient collective is large and heterogeneous. There are therefore grounds for investigating the possibility of developing personalized therapies by classifying patients into groups according to biomarkers. This study aims to combine an assessment of the efficacy of treatment with a preparation of human immunoglobulins G, A, and M (IgGAM) with individual status of various biomarkers (immunoglobulin level, procalcitonin, interleukin 6, antigen D-related human leucocyte antigen (HLA-DR), transcription factor NF-κB1, adrenomedullin, and pathogen spectrum). METHODS/DESIGN: A total of 200 patients with sepsis or septic shock will receive standard-of-care treatment (SoC). Of these, 133 patients (selected by 1:2 randomization) will in addition receive infusions of IgGAM for 5 days. All patients will be followed for approximately 90 days and assessed by the multiple-organ failure (MOF) score, by the EQ QLQ 5D quality-of-life scale, and by measurement of vital signs, biomarkers (as above), and survival. DISCUSSION: This study is intended to provide further information on the efficacy and safety of treatment with IgGAM and to offer the possibility of correlating these with the biomarkers to be studied. Specifically, it will test (at a descriptive level) the hypothesis that patients receiving IgGAM who have higher inflammation status (IL-6) and poorer immune status (low HLA-DR, low immunoglobulin levels) have a better outcome than patients who do not receive IgGAM. It is expected to provide information that will help to close the knowledge gap concerning the association between the effect of IgGAM and the presence of various biomarkers, thus possibly opening the way to a personalized medicine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT, 2016–001788-34; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03334006. Registered on 17 Nov 2017. Trial sponsor: RWTH Aachen University, represented by the Center for Translational & Clinical Research Aachen (contact Dr. S. Isfort). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3244-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6399861 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63998612019-03-13 Personalized medicine with IgGAM compared with standard of care for treatment of peritonitis after infectious source control (the PEPPER trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Kalvelage, Christina Zacharowski, Kai Bauhofer, Artur Gockel, Ulrich Adamzik, Michael Nierhaus, Axel Kujath, Peter Eckmann, Christian Pletz, Mathias W. Bracht, Hendrik Simon, Tim-Philipp Winkler, Michael Kindgen-Milles, Detlef Albertsmeier, Markus Weigand, Markus Ellger, Björn Ragaller, Maximilian Ullrich, Roman Marx, Gernot Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Peritonitis is responsible for thousands of deaths annually in Germany alone. Even source control (SC) and antibiotic treatment often fail to prevent severe sepsis or septic shock, and this situation has hardly improved in the past two decades. Most experimental immunomodulatory therapeutics for sepsis have been aimed at blocking or dampening a specific pro-inflammatory immunological mediator. However, the patient collective is large and heterogeneous. There are therefore grounds for investigating the possibility of developing personalized therapies by classifying patients into groups according to biomarkers. This study aims to combine an assessment of the efficacy of treatment with a preparation of human immunoglobulins G, A, and M (IgGAM) with individual status of various biomarkers (immunoglobulin level, procalcitonin, interleukin 6, antigen D-related human leucocyte antigen (HLA-DR), transcription factor NF-κB1, adrenomedullin, and pathogen spectrum). METHODS/DESIGN: A total of 200 patients with sepsis or septic shock will receive standard-of-care treatment (SoC). Of these, 133 patients (selected by 1:2 randomization) will in addition receive infusions of IgGAM for 5 days. All patients will be followed for approximately 90 days and assessed by the multiple-organ failure (MOF) score, by the EQ QLQ 5D quality-of-life scale, and by measurement of vital signs, biomarkers (as above), and survival. DISCUSSION: This study is intended to provide further information on the efficacy and safety of treatment with IgGAM and to offer the possibility of correlating these with the biomarkers to be studied. Specifically, it will test (at a descriptive level) the hypothesis that patients receiving IgGAM who have higher inflammation status (IL-6) and poorer immune status (low HLA-DR, low immunoglobulin levels) have a better outcome than patients who do not receive IgGAM. It is expected to provide information that will help to close the knowledge gap concerning the association between the effect of IgGAM and the presence of various biomarkers, thus possibly opening the way to a personalized medicine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT, 2016–001788-34; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03334006. Registered on 17 Nov 2017. Trial sponsor: RWTH Aachen University, represented by the Center for Translational & Clinical Research Aachen (contact Dr. S. Isfort). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3244-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6399861/ /pubmed/30832742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3244-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Kalvelage, Christina Zacharowski, Kai Bauhofer, Artur Gockel, Ulrich Adamzik, Michael Nierhaus, Axel Kujath, Peter Eckmann, Christian Pletz, Mathias W. Bracht, Hendrik Simon, Tim-Philipp Winkler, Michael Kindgen-Milles, Detlef Albertsmeier, Markus Weigand, Markus Ellger, Björn Ragaller, Maximilian Ullrich, Roman Marx, Gernot Personalized medicine with IgGAM compared with standard of care for treatment of peritonitis after infectious source control (the PEPPER trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Personalized medicine with IgGAM compared with standard of care for treatment of peritonitis after infectious source control (the PEPPER trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Personalized medicine with IgGAM compared with standard of care for treatment of peritonitis after infectious source control (the PEPPER trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Personalized medicine with IgGAM compared with standard of care for treatment of peritonitis after infectious source control (the PEPPER trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Personalized medicine with IgGAM compared with standard of care for treatment of peritonitis after infectious source control (the PEPPER trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Personalized medicine with IgGAM compared with standard of care for treatment of peritonitis after infectious source control (the PEPPER trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | personalized medicine with iggam compared with standard of care for treatment of peritonitis after infectious source control (the pepper trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30832742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3244-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kalvelagechristina personalizedmedicinewithiggamcomparedwithstandardofcarefortreatmentofperitonitisafterinfectioussourcecontrolthepeppertrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zacharowskikai personalizedmedicinewithiggamcomparedwithstandardofcarefortreatmentofperitonitisafterinfectioussourcecontrolthepeppertrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bauhoferartur personalizedmedicinewithiggamcomparedwithstandardofcarefortreatmentofperitonitisafterinfectioussourcecontrolthepeppertrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gockelulrich personalizedmedicinewithiggamcomparedwithstandardofcarefortreatmentofperitonitisafterinfectioussourcecontrolthepeppertrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT adamzikmichael personalizedmedicinewithiggamcomparedwithstandardofcarefortreatmentofperitonitisafterinfectioussourcecontrolthepeppertrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT nierhausaxel personalizedmedicinewithiggamcomparedwithstandardofcarefortreatmentofperitonitisafterinfectioussourcecontrolthepeppertrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kujathpeter personalizedmedicinewithiggamcomparedwithstandardofcarefortreatmentofperitonitisafterinfectioussourcecontrolthepeppertrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT eckmannchristian personalizedmedicinewithiggamcomparedwithstandardofcarefortreatmentofperitonitisafterinfectioussourcecontrolthepeppertrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pletzmathiasw personalizedmedicinewithiggamcomparedwithstandardofcarefortreatmentofperitonitisafterinfectioussourcecontrolthepeppertrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT brachthendrik personalizedmedicinewithiggamcomparedwithstandardofcarefortreatmentofperitonitisafterinfectioussourcecontrolthepeppertrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT simontimphilipp personalizedmedicinewithiggamcomparedwithstandardofcarefortreatmentofperitonitisafterinfectioussourcecontrolthepeppertrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT winklermichael personalizedmedicinewithiggamcomparedwithstandardofcarefortreatmentofperitonitisafterinfectioussourcecontrolthepeppertrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kindgenmillesdetlef personalizedmedicinewithiggamcomparedwithstandardofcarefortreatmentofperitonitisafterinfectioussourcecontrolthepeppertrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT albertsmeiermarkus personalizedmedicinewithiggamcomparedwithstandardofcarefortreatmentofperitonitisafterinfectioussourcecontrolthepeppertrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT weigandmarkus personalizedmedicinewithiggamcomparedwithstandardofcarefortreatmentofperitonitisafterinfectioussourcecontrolthepeppertrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ellgerbjorn personalizedmedicinewithiggamcomparedwithstandardofcarefortreatmentofperitonitisafterinfectioussourcecontrolthepeppertrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ragallermaximilian personalizedmedicinewithiggamcomparedwithstandardofcarefortreatmentofperitonitisafterinfectioussourcecontrolthepeppertrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ullrichroman personalizedmedicinewithiggamcomparedwithstandardofcarefortreatmentofperitonitisafterinfectioussourcecontrolthepeppertrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT marxgernot personalizedmedicinewithiggamcomparedwithstandardofcarefortreatmentofperitonitisafterinfectioussourcecontrolthepeppertrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |