Cargando…

Strengthening partnerships between substance use researchers and policy makers to take advantage of a window of opportunity

BACKGROUND: The National Institute on Drug Abuse has identified a persistent research-to-practice gap in the implementation of evidence-based prevention and treatment programs for substance use disorder. To identify mechanisms to close this gap, we sought to obtain and characterize the range of poli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meisel, Zachary F., Mitchell, Julia, Polsky, Daniel, Boualam, Nada, McGeoch, Ellen, Weiner, Janet, Miclette, Matthew, Purtle, Jonathan, Schackman, Bruce, Cannuscio, Carolyn C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30832690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13011-019-0199-0
_version_ 1783399829568749568
author Meisel, Zachary F.
Mitchell, Julia
Polsky, Daniel
Boualam, Nada
McGeoch, Ellen
Weiner, Janet
Miclette, Matthew
Purtle, Jonathan
Schackman, Bruce
Cannuscio, Carolyn C.
author_facet Meisel, Zachary F.
Mitchell, Julia
Polsky, Daniel
Boualam, Nada
McGeoch, Ellen
Weiner, Janet
Miclette, Matthew
Purtle, Jonathan
Schackman, Bruce
Cannuscio, Carolyn C.
author_sort Meisel, Zachary F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The National Institute on Drug Abuse has identified a persistent research-to-practice gap in the implementation of evidence-based prevention and treatment programs for substance use disorder. To identify mechanisms to close this gap, we sought to obtain and characterize the range of policy makers’ perspectives on the use of research in substance use disorder treatment and coverage decisions. METHODS: We conducted open-ended, semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of eighteen policy makers involved in the delivery of health services. The aim was to identify barriers and facilitators, attitudes, beliefs, and experiences surrounding the use of research related to the treatment and economics of substance use disorder. RESULTS: The analysis generated four themes: 1) policy maker engagement with evidence and researchers; 2) strategic use and usefulness of research; 3) scientific rigor versus relevance; and 4) communication of evidence. Within each theme, the participants identified barriers, facilitators, current practice, and gave their perspectives on “ideal conditions” for research design, conduct and communication. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations for investigators are the following actionable steps: 1) partner with policy makers early in the research process, 2) formulate and use research designs to meet the strategic goals of end-users; 3) systematically test alternative phrasing of scientific terminology – particularly in the realm of cost effectiveness research – that allow end users to better understand and repurpose the data; 4) incorporate qualitative research methods to uncover the narratives that explain the context and relevance of evidence; 5) incorporate study designs that prioritize timeliness of results; and 6) promote and reward researcher involvement in policy discussions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13011-019-0199-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6399875
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63998752019-03-13 Strengthening partnerships between substance use researchers and policy makers to take advantage of a window of opportunity Meisel, Zachary F. Mitchell, Julia Polsky, Daniel Boualam, Nada McGeoch, Ellen Weiner, Janet Miclette, Matthew Purtle, Jonathan Schackman, Bruce Cannuscio, Carolyn C. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy Research BACKGROUND: The National Institute on Drug Abuse has identified a persistent research-to-practice gap in the implementation of evidence-based prevention and treatment programs for substance use disorder. To identify mechanisms to close this gap, we sought to obtain and characterize the range of policy makers’ perspectives on the use of research in substance use disorder treatment and coverage decisions. METHODS: We conducted open-ended, semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of eighteen policy makers involved in the delivery of health services. The aim was to identify barriers and facilitators, attitudes, beliefs, and experiences surrounding the use of research related to the treatment and economics of substance use disorder. RESULTS: The analysis generated four themes: 1) policy maker engagement with evidence and researchers; 2) strategic use and usefulness of research; 3) scientific rigor versus relevance; and 4) communication of evidence. Within each theme, the participants identified barriers, facilitators, current practice, and gave their perspectives on “ideal conditions” for research design, conduct and communication. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations for investigators are the following actionable steps: 1) partner with policy makers early in the research process, 2) formulate and use research designs to meet the strategic goals of end-users; 3) systematically test alternative phrasing of scientific terminology – particularly in the realm of cost effectiveness research – that allow end users to better understand and repurpose the data; 4) incorporate qualitative research methods to uncover the narratives that explain the context and relevance of evidence; 5) incorporate study designs that prioritize timeliness of results; and 6) promote and reward researcher involvement in policy discussions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13011-019-0199-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6399875/ /pubmed/30832690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13011-019-0199-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Meisel, Zachary F.
Mitchell, Julia
Polsky, Daniel
Boualam, Nada
McGeoch, Ellen
Weiner, Janet
Miclette, Matthew
Purtle, Jonathan
Schackman, Bruce
Cannuscio, Carolyn C.
Strengthening partnerships between substance use researchers and policy makers to take advantage of a window of opportunity
title Strengthening partnerships between substance use researchers and policy makers to take advantage of a window of opportunity
title_full Strengthening partnerships between substance use researchers and policy makers to take advantage of a window of opportunity
title_fullStr Strengthening partnerships between substance use researchers and policy makers to take advantage of a window of opportunity
title_full_unstemmed Strengthening partnerships between substance use researchers and policy makers to take advantage of a window of opportunity
title_short Strengthening partnerships between substance use researchers and policy makers to take advantage of a window of opportunity
title_sort strengthening partnerships between substance use researchers and policy makers to take advantage of a window of opportunity
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30832690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13011-019-0199-0
work_keys_str_mv AT meiselzacharyf strengtheningpartnershipsbetweensubstanceuseresearchersandpolicymakerstotakeadvantageofawindowofopportunity
AT mitchelljulia strengtheningpartnershipsbetweensubstanceuseresearchersandpolicymakerstotakeadvantageofawindowofopportunity
AT polskydaniel strengtheningpartnershipsbetweensubstanceuseresearchersandpolicymakerstotakeadvantageofawindowofopportunity
AT boualamnada strengtheningpartnershipsbetweensubstanceuseresearchersandpolicymakerstotakeadvantageofawindowofopportunity
AT mcgeochellen strengtheningpartnershipsbetweensubstanceuseresearchersandpolicymakerstotakeadvantageofawindowofopportunity
AT weinerjanet strengtheningpartnershipsbetweensubstanceuseresearchersandpolicymakerstotakeadvantageofawindowofopportunity
AT miclettematthew strengtheningpartnershipsbetweensubstanceuseresearchersandpolicymakerstotakeadvantageofawindowofopportunity
AT purtlejonathan strengtheningpartnershipsbetweensubstanceuseresearchersandpolicymakerstotakeadvantageofawindowofopportunity
AT schackmanbruce strengtheningpartnershipsbetweensubstanceuseresearchersandpolicymakerstotakeadvantageofawindowofopportunity
AT cannusciocarolync strengtheningpartnershipsbetweensubstanceuseresearchersandpolicymakerstotakeadvantageofawindowofopportunity