Cargando…

Raw meat-based diets for dogs: survey of owners’ motivations, attitudes and practices

BACKGROUND: The popularity of raw meat-based diets (RMBDs) for pets has been increasing in recent years even if the reputed health benefits are mainly anecdotal. A web-based survey was developed to better understand the motivations and habits of owners who decided to feed their dogs RMBDs. RESULTS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morelli, Giada, Bastianello, Sofia, Catellani, Paolo, Ricci, Rebecca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30832667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-1824-x
_version_ 1783399849715040256
author Morelli, Giada
Bastianello, Sofia
Catellani, Paolo
Ricci, Rebecca
author_facet Morelli, Giada
Bastianello, Sofia
Catellani, Paolo
Ricci, Rebecca
author_sort Morelli, Giada
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The popularity of raw meat-based diets (RMBDs) for pets has been increasing in recent years even if the reputed health benefits are mainly anecdotal. A web-based survey was developed to better understand the motivations and habits of owners who decided to feed their dogs RMBDs. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 218 dog owners, 62 of whom were living with people whose immune system was impaired or weakened. Internet was the preferred source of information for more than half of the respondents, and feeding dogs a more natural and healthier diet was the main reason behind owners’ interest in RMBDs. About 80% of the participants completely abandoned commercial pet food and showed marked distrust especially towards the lack of clarity on the ingredients used (n = 169). The vast majority of owners interviewed (94%) believed RMBDs to be absolutely safe for dogs, and shinier coat, muscle mass gain, and cleaner teeth were the principal improvements seen on their pets. Controlling the composition and quality of the ingredients provided to their animals was the main advantage of RMBDs for 57% of the owners, while the main disadvantages were related to the purchase of some components (38%) and the time required (22%) for the preparation of the diet. Only 8% of the respondents relied on veterinarians for RMBD formulation, and a wide variety of feeding regimens and combinations of ingredients was observed. CONCLUSIONS: As revealed by this study, most owners are unaware of the risks posed by the feeding of RMBDs for both animal and human health, and they often rely on questionable sources for advice on pet nutrition. Owners see RMBDs as a more natural and healthier alternative to commercial pet food even if the actual benefits remain unproven. Consulting veterinarians for proper information and board-certified nutritionists for the formulation of complete and balanced RMBDs should be promoted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12917-019-1824-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6399943
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63999432019-03-13 Raw meat-based diets for dogs: survey of owners’ motivations, attitudes and practices Morelli, Giada Bastianello, Sofia Catellani, Paolo Ricci, Rebecca BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The popularity of raw meat-based diets (RMBDs) for pets has been increasing in recent years even if the reputed health benefits are mainly anecdotal. A web-based survey was developed to better understand the motivations and habits of owners who decided to feed their dogs RMBDs. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 218 dog owners, 62 of whom were living with people whose immune system was impaired or weakened. Internet was the preferred source of information for more than half of the respondents, and feeding dogs a more natural and healthier diet was the main reason behind owners’ interest in RMBDs. About 80% of the participants completely abandoned commercial pet food and showed marked distrust especially towards the lack of clarity on the ingredients used (n = 169). The vast majority of owners interviewed (94%) believed RMBDs to be absolutely safe for dogs, and shinier coat, muscle mass gain, and cleaner teeth were the principal improvements seen on their pets. Controlling the composition and quality of the ingredients provided to their animals was the main advantage of RMBDs for 57% of the owners, while the main disadvantages were related to the purchase of some components (38%) and the time required (22%) for the preparation of the diet. Only 8% of the respondents relied on veterinarians for RMBD formulation, and a wide variety of feeding regimens and combinations of ingredients was observed. CONCLUSIONS: As revealed by this study, most owners are unaware of the risks posed by the feeding of RMBDs for both animal and human health, and they often rely on questionable sources for advice on pet nutrition. Owners see RMBDs as a more natural and healthier alternative to commercial pet food even if the actual benefits remain unproven. Consulting veterinarians for proper information and board-certified nutritionists for the formulation of complete and balanced RMBDs should be promoted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12917-019-1824-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6399943/ /pubmed/30832667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-1824-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Morelli, Giada
Bastianello, Sofia
Catellani, Paolo
Ricci, Rebecca
Raw meat-based diets for dogs: survey of owners’ motivations, attitudes and practices
title Raw meat-based diets for dogs: survey of owners’ motivations, attitudes and practices
title_full Raw meat-based diets for dogs: survey of owners’ motivations, attitudes and practices
title_fullStr Raw meat-based diets for dogs: survey of owners’ motivations, attitudes and practices
title_full_unstemmed Raw meat-based diets for dogs: survey of owners’ motivations, attitudes and practices
title_short Raw meat-based diets for dogs: survey of owners’ motivations, attitudes and practices
title_sort raw meat-based diets for dogs: survey of owners’ motivations, attitudes and practices
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30832667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-1824-x
work_keys_str_mv AT morelligiada rawmeatbaseddietsfordogssurveyofownersmotivationsattitudesandpractices
AT bastianellosofia rawmeatbaseddietsfordogssurveyofownersmotivationsattitudesandpractices
AT catellanipaolo rawmeatbaseddietsfordogssurveyofownersmotivationsattitudesandpractices
AT riccirebecca rawmeatbaseddietsfordogssurveyofownersmotivationsattitudesandpractices