Cargando…

Recruiting general practitioners for palliative care research in primary care: real-life barriers explained

BACKGROUND: The implementation of early palliative care within a primary care setting is a recent academic topic. Recruiting General Practitioners (GPs) to participate in a palliative care study can be challenging. The pro-Spinoza project implemented a Care Pathway for Primary Palliative Care in 5 a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leysen, B., Van den Eynden, B., Janssens, A., Wens, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30836994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-0930-y
_version_ 1783399852021907456
author Leysen, B.
Van den Eynden, B.
Janssens, A.
Wens, J.
author_facet Leysen, B.
Van den Eynden, B.
Janssens, A.
Wens, J.
author_sort Leysen, B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The implementation of early palliative care within a primary care setting is a recent academic topic. Recruiting General Practitioners (GPs) to participate in a palliative care study can be challenging. The pro-Spinoza project implemented a Care Pathway for Primary Palliative Care in 5 areas in Belgium. During this project, the feasibility of the recruitment of GPs and palliative care patients was evaluated. METHODS: The recruitment process was recorded in detail via an electronic logbook combining quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative recordings included the contact types and the number of contacts with eligible GPs and were analysed descriptively. Qualitative recordings included field notes with feedback from the GPs and other stakeholders and were thematically analysed starting from the Grol and Wensing framework for professional behaviour change. RESULTS: Of 4065 eligible GPs working in 5 areas under research, 787 GPs (19%) were contacted individually, 398 GPs (9,8%) were contacted face-to-face and most of these 398 GPs showed high interest in the topic. 112 GPs (2,8%) signed the collaboration agreement, but finally only 65 GPs (1,6%) delivered at least a completed baseline-questionnaire. Despite the initial interest in participating, the unpredictable and busy daily workloads of the GPs, as well as inexperience with research protocols, impeded the ability of the GPs to fully engage in the study. This resulted in the high dropout rate. Participating GPs reported that they had underestimated the effort required to effectively participate in the project. CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment of GPs to palliative care research is challenging. Primary care is a vital service to engage in palliative care research however the practical limitations reduce the ability of the service to effectively engage in the research. More research is needed to determine how GPs might be better supported in research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02266069, Registered 16th October 2014, retrospectively registered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6399951
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63999512019-03-14 Recruiting general practitioners for palliative care research in primary care: real-life barriers explained Leysen, B. Van den Eynden, B. Janssens, A. Wens, J. BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: The implementation of early palliative care within a primary care setting is a recent academic topic. Recruiting General Practitioners (GPs) to participate in a palliative care study can be challenging. The pro-Spinoza project implemented a Care Pathway for Primary Palliative Care in 5 areas in Belgium. During this project, the feasibility of the recruitment of GPs and palliative care patients was evaluated. METHODS: The recruitment process was recorded in detail via an electronic logbook combining quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative recordings included the contact types and the number of contacts with eligible GPs and were analysed descriptively. Qualitative recordings included field notes with feedback from the GPs and other stakeholders and were thematically analysed starting from the Grol and Wensing framework for professional behaviour change. RESULTS: Of 4065 eligible GPs working in 5 areas under research, 787 GPs (19%) were contacted individually, 398 GPs (9,8%) were contacted face-to-face and most of these 398 GPs showed high interest in the topic. 112 GPs (2,8%) signed the collaboration agreement, but finally only 65 GPs (1,6%) delivered at least a completed baseline-questionnaire. Despite the initial interest in participating, the unpredictable and busy daily workloads of the GPs, as well as inexperience with research protocols, impeded the ability of the GPs to fully engage in the study. This resulted in the high dropout rate. Participating GPs reported that they had underestimated the effort required to effectively participate in the project. CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment of GPs to palliative care research is challenging. Primary care is a vital service to engage in palliative care research however the practical limitations reduce the ability of the service to effectively engage in the research. More research is needed to determine how GPs might be better supported in research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02266069, Registered 16th October 2014, retrospectively registered. BioMed Central 2019-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6399951/ /pubmed/30836994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-0930-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Leysen, B.
Van den Eynden, B.
Janssens, A.
Wens, J.
Recruiting general practitioners for palliative care research in primary care: real-life barriers explained
title Recruiting general practitioners for palliative care research in primary care: real-life barriers explained
title_full Recruiting general practitioners for palliative care research in primary care: real-life barriers explained
title_fullStr Recruiting general practitioners for palliative care research in primary care: real-life barriers explained
title_full_unstemmed Recruiting general practitioners for palliative care research in primary care: real-life barriers explained
title_short Recruiting general practitioners for palliative care research in primary care: real-life barriers explained
title_sort recruiting general practitioners for palliative care research in primary care: real-life barriers explained
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30836994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-0930-y
work_keys_str_mv AT leysenb recruitinggeneralpractitionersforpalliativecareresearchinprimarycarereallifebarriersexplained
AT vandeneyndenb recruitinggeneralpractitionersforpalliativecareresearchinprimarycarereallifebarriersexplained
AT janssensa recruitinggeneralpractitionersforpalliativecareresearchinprimarycarereallifebarriersexplained
AT wensj recruitinggeneralpractitionersforpalliativecareresearchinprimarycarereallifebarriersexplained