Cargando…

The Clarus Video System (Trachway) and direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation with cricoid pressure in simulated rapid sequence induction intubation: a prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: During an emergency endotracheal intubation, rapid sequence induction intubation (RSII) with cricoid pressure (CP) is frequently implemented to prevent aspiration pneumonia. We evaluated the CVS in endotracheal intubation in RSII with CP, in comparison with a direct laryngoscope (DL). ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Yen-Chu, Cho, An-Hsun, Lin, Jr-Rung, Chung, Yung-Tai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30832590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0703-0
_version_ 1783399858743279616
author Lin, Yen-Chu
Cho, An-Hsun
Lin, Jr-Rung
Chung, Yung-Tai
author_facet Lin, Yen-Chu
Cho, An-Hsun
Lin, Jr-Rung
Chung, Yung-Tai
author_sort Lin, Yen-Chu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During an emergency endotracheal intubation, rapid sequence induction intubation (RSII) with cricoid pressure (CP) is frequently implemented to prevent aspiration pneumonia. We evaluated the CVS in endotracheal intubation in RSII with CP, in comparison with a direct laryngoscope (DL). METHODS: One hundred fifty patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the CVS as a video stylet (CVS-V) group, the CVS as a lightwand (CVS-L) group and DL group. Primary outcomes were to assess the power of the CVS, compared with DL, regarding the first attempt success rate and intubation time in simulated RSII with CP. Secondary outcomes were to examine hemodynamic stress response and the incidence of complications. RESULTS: The first attempt success rates within 30 s and within 60 s were higher in CVS-V and DL group than those in CVS-L group (p = 0.006 and 0.037, respectively). The intergroup difference for intubation success rate within 30 s was nonsignificant and almost all the patients were successfully intubated within 60 s (98% for CVS-L and DL group, 96% for CVS-L group). Kaplan-Meier estimator demonstrated the median intubation time was 10.6 s [95% CI, 7.5 to 13.7] in CVS-V group, 14.6 s [95% CI, 11.1 to 18.0] in CVS-L group and 16.5 s [95% CI, 15.7 to 17.3] in DL group (p = 0.023 by the log-rank test). However, the difference was nonsignificant after Sidak’s adjustment. The intergroup differences for hemodynamic stress response, sore throat and mucosa injury incidence were also nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: The CVS-D and DL provide a higher first attempt intubation success rate within 30 and 60 s in intubation with CP; the intubation time for the CVS-V was nonsignificantly shorter than that for the other two intubation methods. Almost all the patients can be successfully intubated with any of the three intubation methods within 60 s. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03841890, registered on February 15, 2019 (retrospectively registered).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6399974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63999742019-03-14 The Clarus Video System (Trachway) and direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation with cricoid pressure in simulated rapid sequence induction intubation: a prospective randomized controlled trial Lin, Yen-Chu Cho, An-Hsun Lin, Jr-Rung Chung, Yung-Tai BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: During an emergency endotracheal intubation, rapid sequence induction intubation (RSII) with cricoid pressure (CP) is frequently implemented to prevent aspiration pneumonia. We evaluated the CVS in endotracheal intubation in RSII with CP, in comparison with a direct laryngoscope (DL). METHODS: One hundred fifty patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the CVS as a video stylet (CVS-V) group, the CVS as a lightwand (CVS-L) group and DL group. Primary outcomes were to assess the power of the CVS, compared with DL, regarding the first attempt success rate and intubation time in simulated RSII with CP. Secondary outcomes were to examine hemodynamic stress response and the incidence of complications. RESULTS: The first attempt success rates within 30 s and within 60 s were higher in CVS-V and DL group than those in CVS-L group (p = 0.006 and 0.037, respectively). The intergroup difference for intubation success rate within 30 s was nonsignificant and almost all the patients were successfully intubated within 60 s (98% for CVS-L and DL group, 96% for CVS-L group). Kaplan-Meier estimator demonstrated the median intubation time was 10.6 s [95% CI, 7.5 to 13.7] in CVS-V group, 14.6 s [95% CI, 11.1 to 18.0] in CVS-L group and 16.5 s [95% CI, 15.7 to 17.3] in DL group (p = 0.023 by the log-rank test). However, the difference was nonsignificant after Sidak’s adjustment. The intergroup differences for hemodynamic stress response, sore throat and mucosa injury incidence were also nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: The CVS-D and DL provide a higher first attempt intubation success rate within 30 and 60 s in intubation with CP; the intubation time for the CVS-V was nonsignificantly shorter than that for the other two intubation methods. Almost all the patients can be successfully intubated with any of the three intubation methods within 60 s. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03841890, registered on February 15, 2019 (retrospectively registered). BioMed Central 2019-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6399974/ /pubmed/30832590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0703-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lin, Yen-Chu
Cho, An-Hsun
Lin, Jr-Rung
Chung, Yung-Tai
The Clarus Video System (Trachway) and direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation with cricoid pressure in simulated rapid sequence induction intubation: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title The Clarus Video System (Trachway) and direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation with cricoid pressure in simulated rapid sequence induction intubation: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full The Clarus Video System (Trachway) and direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation with cricoid pressure in simulated rapid sequence induction intubation: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The Clarus Video System (Trachway) and direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation with cricoid pressure in simulated rapid sequence induction intubation: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The Clarus Video System (Trachway) and direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation with cricoid pressure in simulated rapid sequence induction intubation: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_short The Clarus Video System (Trachway) and direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation with cricoid pressure in simulated rapid sequence induction intubation: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_sort clarus video system (trachway) and direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation with cricoid pressure in simulated rapid sequence induction intubation: a prospective randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30832590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0703-0
work_keys_str_mv AT linyenchu theclarusvideosystemtrachwayanddirectlaryngoscopeforendotrachealintubationwithcricoidpressureinsimulatedrapidsequenceinductionintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT choanhsun theclarusvideosystemtrachwayanddirectlaryngoscopeforendotrachealintubationwithcricoidpressureinsimulatedrapidsequenceinductionintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT linjrrung theclarusvideosystemtrachwayanddirectlaryngoscopeforendotrachealintubationwithcricoidpressureinsimulatedrapidsequenceinductionintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chungyungtai theclarusvideosystemtrachwayanddirectlaryngoscopeforendotrachealintubationwithcricoidpressureinsimulatedrapidsequenceinductionintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT linyenchu clarusvideosystemtrachwayanddirectlaryngoscopeforendotrachealintubationwithcricoidpressureinsimulatedrapidsequenceinductionintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT choanhsun clarusvideosystemtrachwayanddirectlaryngoscopeforendotrachealintubationwithcricoidpressureinsimulatedrapidsequenceinductionintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT linjrrung clarusvideosystemtrachwayanddirectlaryngoscopeforendotrachealintubationwithcricoidpressureinsimulatedrapidsequenceinductionintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chungyungtai clarusvideosystemtrachwayanddirectlaryngoscopeforendotrachealintubationwithcricoidpressureinsimulatedrapidsequenceinductionintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial