Cargando…
The Clarus Video System (Trachway) and direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation with cricoid pressure in simulated rapid sequence induction intubation: a prospective randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: During an emergency endotracheal intubation, rapid sequence induction intubation (RSII) with cricoid pressure (CP) is frequently implemented to prevent aspiration pneumonia. We evaluated the CVS in endotracheal intubation in RSII with CP, in comparison with a direct laryngoscope (DL). ME...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30832590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0703-0 |
_version_ | 1783399858743279616 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Yen-Chu Cho, An-Hsun Lin, Jr-Rung Chung, Yung-Tai |
author_facet | Lin, Yen-Chu Cho, An-Hsun Lin, Jr-Rung Chung, Yung-Tai |
author_sort | Lin, Yen-Chu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: During an emergency endotracheal intubation, rapid sequence induction intubation (RSII) with cricoid pressure (CP) is frequently implemented to prevent aspiration pneumonia. We evaluated the CVS in endotracheal intubation in RSII with CP, in comparison with a direct laryngoscope (DL). METHODS: One hundred fifty patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the CVS as a video stylet (CVS-V) group, the CVS as a lightwand (CVS-L) group and DL group. Primary outcomes were to assess the power of the CVS, compared with DL, regarding the first attempt success rate and intubation time in simulated RSII with CP. Secondary outcomes were to examine hemodynamic stress response and the incidence of complications. RESULTS: The first attempt success rates within 30 s and within 60 s were higher in CVS-V and DL group than those in CVS-L group (p = 0.006 and 0.037, respectively). The intergroup difference for intubation success rate within 30 s was nonsignificant and almost all the patients were successfully intubated within 60 s (98% for CVS-L and DL group, 96% for CVS-L group). Kaplan-Meier estimator demonstrated the median intubation time was 10.6 s [95% CI, 7.5 to 13.7] in CVS-V group, 14.6 s [95% CI, 11.1 to 18.0] in CVS-L group and 16.5 s [95% CI, 15.7 to 17.3] in DL group (p = 0.023 by the log-rank test). However, the difference was nonsignificant after Sidak’s adjustment. The intergroup differences for hemodynamic stress response, sore throat and mucosa injury incidence were also nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: The CVS-D and DL provide a higher first attempt intubation success rate within 30 and 60 s in intubation with CP; the intubation time for the CVS-V was nonsignificantly shorter than that for the other two intubation methods. Almost all the patients can be successfully intubated with any of the three intubation methods within 60 s. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03841890, registered on February 15, 2019 (retrospectively registered). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6399974 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63999742019-03-14 The Clarus Video System (Trachway) and direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation with cricoid pressure in simulated rapid sequence induction intubation: a prospective randomized controlled trial Lin, Yen-Chu Cho, An-Hsun Lin, Jr-Rung Chung, Yung-Tai BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: During an emergency endotracheal intubation, rapid sequence induction intubation (RSII) with cricoid pressure (CP) is frequently implemented to prevent aspiration pneumonia. We evaluated the CVS in endotracheal intubation in RSII with CP, in comparison with a direct laryngoscope (DL). METHODS: One hundred fifty patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the CVS as a video stylet (CVS-V) group, the CVS as a lightwand (CVS-L) group and DL group. Primary outcomes were to assess the power of the CVS, compared with DL, regarding the first attempt success rate and intubation time in simulated RSII with CP. Secondary outcomes were to examine hemodynamic stress response and the incidence of complications. RESULTS: The first attempt success rates within 30 s and within 60 s were higher in CVS-V and DL group than those in CVS-L group (p = 0.006 and 0.037, respectively). The intergroup difference for intubation success rate within 30 s was nonsignificant and almost all the patients were successfully intubated within 60 s (98% for CVS-L and DL group, 96% for CVS-L group). Kaplan-Meier estimator demonstrated the median intubation time was 10.6 s [95% CI, 7.5 to 13.7] in CVS-V group, 14.6 s [95% CI, 11.1 to 18.0] in CVS-L group and 16.5 s [95% CI, 15.7 to 17.3] in DL group (p = 0.023 by the log-rank test). However, the difference was nonsignificant after Sidak’s adjustment. The intergroup differences for hemodynamic stress response, sore throat and mucosa injury incidence were also nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: The CVS-D and DL provide a higher first attempt intubation success rate within 30 and 60 s in intubation with CP; the intubation time for the CVS-V was nonsignificantly shorter than that for the other two intubation methods. Almost all the patients can be successfully intubated with any of the three intubation methods within 60 s. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03841890, registered on February 15, 2019 (retrospectively registered). BioMed Central 2019-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6399974/ /pubmed/30832590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0703-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lin, Yen-Chu Cho, An-Hsun Lin, Jr-Rung Chung, Yung-Tai The Clarus Video System (Trachway) and direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation with cricoid pressure in simulated rapid sequence induction intubation: a prospective randomized controlled trial |
title | The Clarus Video System (Trachway) and direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation with cricoid pressure in simulated rapid sequence induction intubation: a prospective randomized controlled trial |
title_full | The Clarus Video System (Trachway) and direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation with cricoid pressure in simulated rapid sequence induction intubation: a prospective randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The Clarus Video System (Trachway) and direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation with cricoid pressure in simulated rapid sequence induction intubation: a prospective randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The Clarus Video System (Trachway) and direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation with cricoid pressure in simulated rapid sequence induction intubation: a prospective randomized controlled trial |
title_short | The Clarus Video System (Trachway) and direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation with cricoid pressure in simulated rapid sequence induction intubation: a prospective randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | clarus video system (trachway) and direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation with cricoid pressure in simulated rapid sequence induction intubation: a prospective randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30832590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0703-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linyenchu theclarusvideosystemtrachwayanddirectlaryngoscopeforendotrachealintubationwithcricoidpressureinsimulatedrapidsequenceinductionintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT choanhsun theclarusvideosystemtrachwayanddirectlaryngoscopeforendotrachealintubationwithcricoidpressureinsimulatedrapidsequenceinductionintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT linjrrung theclarusvideosystemtrachwayanddirectlaryngoscopeforendotrachealintubationwithcricoidpressureinsimulatedrapidsequenceinductionintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chungyungtai theclarusvideosystemtrachwayanddirectlaryngoscopeforendotrachealintubationwithcricoidpressureinsimulatedrapidsequenceinductionintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT linyenchu clarusvideosystemtrachwayanddirectlaryngoscopeforendotrachealintubationwithcricoidpressureinsimulatedrapidsequenceinductionintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT choanhsun clarusvideosystemtrachwayanddirectlaryngoscopeforendotrachealintubationwithcricoidpressureinsimulatedrapidsequenceinductionintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT linjrrung clarusvideosystemtrachwayanddirectlaryngoscopeforendotrachealintubationwithcricoidpressureinsimulatedrapidsequenceinductionintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chungyungtai clarusvideosystemtrachwayanddirectlaryngoscopeforendotrachealintubationwithcricoidpressureinsimulatedrapidsequenceinductionintubationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial |