Cargando…

Screening for Dementia Caused by Modifiable Lifestyle Choices Using Hybrid PET/MRI

Significant advances in positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain imaging in the early detection of dementia indicate that hybrid PET/MRI would be an effective tool to screen for dementia in the population living with lifestyle risk factors. Here we investigate th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prato, Frank S., Pavlosky, William F., Foster, Steven C., Thiessen, Jonathan D., Beaujot, Roderic P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6400112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30842996
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ADR-180098
_version_ 1783399890826559488
author Prato, Frank S.
Pavlosky, William F.
Foster, Steven C.
Thiessen, Jonathan D.
Beaujot, Roderic P.
author_facet Prato, Frank S.
Pavlosky, William F.
Foster, Steven C.
Thiessen, Jonathan D.
Beaujot, Roderic P.
author_sort Prato, Frank S.
collection PubMed
description Significant advances in positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain imaging in the early detection of dementia indicate that hybrid PET/MRI would be an effective tool to screen for dementia in the population living with lifestyle risk factors. Here we investigate the associated costs and benefits along with the needed imaging infrastructure. A demographic analysis determined the prevalence of dementia and its incidence. The expected value of the screening program was calculated assuming a sensitivity and specificity of 0.9, a prevalence of 0.1, a QALY factor of 0.348, a willingness to pay $114,000 CAD and the cost per PET/MRI scan of $2,000 CAD. It was assumed that each head PET/MRI could screen 3,000 individuals per year. The prevalence of dementia is increasing by almost two-fold every 20 years due to the increased population at ages where dementia is more prevalent. It has been shown that a five-year delay in the incidence of dementia would decrease the prevalence by some 45%. In Canada, a five-year delay corresponds to a health care savings of $27,000 CAD per subject per year. The expected value for screening was estimated at $23,745 CAD. The number of subjects to be screened per year in Canada, USA, and China between 60 and 79 was 11,405,000. The corresponding number of head-only hybrid PET/MRI systems needed is 3,800. A brain PET/MRI screening program is financially justifiable with respect to health care costs and justifies the continuing development of MRI compatible brain PET technology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6400112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64001122019-03-06 Screening for Dementia Caused by Modifiable Lifestyle Choices Using Hybrid PET/MRI Prato, Frank S. Pavlosky, William F. Foster, Steven C. Thiessen, Jonathan D. Beaujot, Roderic P. J Alzheimers Dis Rep Review Significant advances in positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain imaging in the early detection of dementia indicate that hybrid PET/MRI would be an effective tool to screen for dementia in the population living with lifestyle risk factors. Here we investigate the associated costs and benefits along with the needed imaging infrastructure. A demographic analysis determined the prevalence of dementia and its incidence. The expected value of the screening program was calculated assuming a sensitivity and specificity of 0.9, a prevalence of 0.1, a QALY factor of 0.348, a willingness to pay $114,000 CAD and the cost per PET/MRI scan of $2,000 CAD. It was assumed that each head PET/MRI could screen 3,000 individuals per year. The prevalence of dementia is increasing by almost two-fold every 20 years due to the increased population at ages where dementia is more prevalent. It has been shown that a five-year delay in the incidence of dementia would decrease the prevalence by some 45%. In Canada, a five-year delay corresponds to a health care savings of $27,000 CAD per subject per year. The expected value for screening was estimated at $23,745 CAD. The number of subjects to be screened per year in Canada, USA, and China between 60 and 79 was 11,405,000. The corresponding number of head-only hybrid PET/MRI systems needed is 3,800. A brain PET/MRI screening program is financially justifiable with respect to health care costs and justifies the continuing development of MRI compatible brain PET technology. IOS Press 2019-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6400112/ /pubmed/30842996 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ADR-180098 Text en © 2019 – IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Prato, Frank S.
Pavlosky, William F.
Foster, Steven C.
Thiessen, Jonathan D.
Beaujot, Roderic P.
Screening for Dementia Caused by Modifiable Lifestyle Choices Using Hybrid PET/MRI
title Screening for Dementia Caused by Modifiable Lifestyle Choices Using Hybrid PET/MRI
title_full Screening for Dementia Caused by Modifiable Lifestyle Choices Using Hybrid PET/MRI
title_fullStr Screening for Dementia Caused by Modifiable Lifestyle Choices Using Hybrid PET/MRI
title_full_unstemmed Screening for Dementia Caused by Modifiable Lifestyle Choices Using Hybrid PET/MRI
title_short Screening for Dementia Caused by Modifiable Lifestyle Choices Using Hybrid PET/MRI
title_sort screening for dementia caused by modifiable lifestyle choices using hybrid pet/mri
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6400112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30842996
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ADR-180098
work_keys_str_mv AT pratofranks screeningfordementiacausedbymodifiablelifestylechoicesusinghybridpetmri
AT pavloskywilliamf screeningfordementiacausedbymodifiablelifestylechoicesusinghybridpetmri
AT fosterstevenc screeningfordementiacausedbymodifiablelifestylechoicesusinghybridpetmri
AT thiessenjonathand screeningfordementiacausedbymodifiablelifestylechoicesusinghybridpetmri
AT beaujotrodericp screeningfordementiacausedbymodifiablelifestylechoicesusinghybridpetmri