Cargando…
Strategies for sample delivery for femtosecond crystallography
Highly efficient data-collection methods are required for successful macromolecular crystallography (MX) experiments at X-ray free-electron lasers (XFELs). XFEL beamtime is scarce, and the high peak brightness of each XFEL pulse destroys the exposed crystal volume. It is therefore necessary to combi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Union of Crystallography
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6400256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30821705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2059798318017953 |
_version_ | 1783399926840950784 |
---|---|
author | Martiel, Isabelle Müller-Werkmeister, Henrike M. Cohen, Aina E. |
author_facet | Martiel, Isabelle Müller-Werkmeister, Henrike M. Cohen, Aina E. |
author_sort | Martiel, Isabelle |
collection | PubMed |
description | Highly efficient data-collection methods are required for successful macromolecular crystallography (MX) experiments at X-ray free-electron lasers (XFELs). XFEL beamtime is scarce, and the high peak brightness of each XFEL pulse destroys the exposed crystal volume. It is therefore necessary to combine diffraction images from a large number of crystals (hundreds to hundreds of thousands) to obtain a final data set, bringing about sample-refreshment challenges that have previously been unknown to the MX synchrotron community. In view of this experimental complexity, a number of sample delivery methods have emerged, each with specific requirements, drawbacks and advantages. To provide useful selection criteria for future experiments, this review summarizes the currently available sample delivery methods, emphasising the basic principles and the specific sample requirements. Two main approaches to sample delivery are first covered: (i) injector methods with liquid or viscous media and (ii) fixed-target methods using large crystals or using microcrystals inside multi-crystal holders or chips. Additionally, hybrid methods such as acoustic droplet ejection and crystal extraction are covered, which combine the advantages of both fixed-target and injector approaches. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6400256 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | International Union of Crystallography |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64002562019-03-13 Strategies for sample delivery for femtosecond crystallography Martiel, Isabelle Müller-Werkmeister, Henrike M. Cohen, Aina E. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol Research Papers Highly efficient data-collection methods are required for successful macromolecular crystallography (MX) experiments at X-ray free-electron lasers (XFELs). XFEL beamtime is scarce, and the high peak brightness of each XFEL pulse destroys the exposed crystal volume. It is therefore necessary to combine diffraction images from a large number of crystals (hundreds to hundreds of thousands) to obtain a final data set, bringing about sample-refreshment challenges that have previously been unknown to the MX synchrotron community. In view of this experimental complexity, a number of sample delivery methods have emerged, each with specific requirements, drawbacks and advantages. To provide useful selection criteria for future experiments, this review summarizes the currently available sample delivery methods, emphasising the basic principles and the specific sample requirements. Two main approaches to sample delivery are first covered: (i) injector methods with liquid or viscous media and (ii) fixed-target methods using large crystals or using microcrystals inside multi-crystal holders or chips. Additionally, hybrid methods such as acoustic droplet ejection and crystal extraction are covered, which combine the advantages of both fixed-target and injector approaches. International Union of Crystallography 2019-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6400256/ /pubmed/30821705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2059798318017953 Text en © Martiel et al. 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research Papers Martiel, Isabelle Müller-Werkmeister, Henrike M. Cohen, Aina E. Strategies for sample delivery for femtosecond crystallography |
title | Strategies for sample delivery for femtosecond crystallography |
title_full | Strategies for sample delivery for femtosecond crystallography |
title_fullStr | Strategies for sample delivery for femtosecond crystallography |
title_full_unstemmed | Strategies for sample delivery for femtosecond crystallography |
title_short | Strategies for sample delivery for femtosecond crystallography |
title_sort | strategies for sample delivery for femtosecond crystallography |
topic | Research Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6400256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30821705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2059798318017953 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martielisabelle strategiesforsampledeliveryforfemtosecondcrystallography AT mullerwerkmeisterhenrikem strategiesforsampledeliveryforfemtosecondcrystallography AT cohenainae strategiesforsampledeliveryforfemtosecondcrystallography |