Cargando…

The Impact of Comorbidity on Rehabilitation Outcome After Ischemic Stroke

SUMMARY – Comorbidity decreases survival but it still remains unknown to what extent functional recovery after ischemic stroke is affected. The aim of this research was to determine the prevalence of the most common comorbidities in patients with ischemic stroke and to examine their predictive value...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simić-Panić, Dušica, Bošković, Ksenija, Milićević, Marija, Žikić, Tamara Rabi, Cvjetković Bošnjak, Mina, Tomašević-Todorović, Snežana, Jovićević, Mirjana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6400340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30256006
http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2018.57.01.01
_version_ 1783399934013210624
author Simić-Panić, Dušica
Bošković, Ksenija
Milićević, Marija
Žikić, Tamara Rabi
Cvjetković Bošnjak, Mina
Tomašević-Todorović, Snežana
Jovićević, Mirjana
author_facet Simić-Panić, Dušica
Bošković, Ksenija
Milićević, Marija
Žikić, Tamara Rabi
Cvjetković Bošnjak, Mina
Tomašević-Todorović, Snežana
Jovićević, Mirjana
author_sort Simić-Panić, Dušica
collection PubMed
description SUMMARY – Comorbidity decreases survival but it still remains unknown to what extent functional recovery after ischemic stroke is affected. The aim of this research was to determine the prevalence of the most common comorbidities in patients with ischemic stroke and to examine their predictive value on the functional status and recovery. In order to obtain relevant information for this research, we conducted a prospective study over a two-year period. It included patients with acute/subacute ischemic stroke who had inhospital rehabilitation treatment in our institution. Functional status of the patients was evaluated by the following three aspects at the beginning and at the end of rehabilitation treatment: Rivermead Mobility Index was used for mobility, Barthel Index for independence in activities of daily living, and modified Rankin Scale for total disability. Modified Charlston Comorbidity Index was used to assess comorbidity. Multivariate analysis was applied to evaluate the impact of recorded comorbidities on the patient functional outcome. Independent predictors of rehabilitation success in our study were the value of modified Charlston Comorbidity Index, atrial fibrillation and myocardial infarction. Our study demonstrated that patients with more comorbidities had worse functional outcome after stroke, so it is important to consider the comorbidity status when planning the rehabilitation treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6400340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64003402019-06-04 The Impact of Comorbidity on Rehabilitation Outcome After Ischemic Stroke Simić-Panić, Dušica Bošković, Ksenija Milićević, Marija Žikić, Tamara Rabi Cvjetković Bošnjak, Mina Tomašević-Todorović, Snežana Jovićević, Mirjana Acta Clin Croat Original Scientific Papers SUMMARY – Comorbidity decreases survival but it still remains unknown to what extent functional recovery after ischemic stroke is affected. The aim of this research was to determine the prevalence of the most common comorbidities in patients with ischemic stroke and to examine their predictive value on the functional status and recovery. In order to obtain relevant information for this research, we conducted a prospective study over a two-year period. It included patients with acute/subacute ischemic stroke who had inhospital rehabilitation treatment in our institution. Functional status of the patients was evaluated by the following three aspects at the beginning and at the end of rehabilitation treatment: Rivermead Mobility Index was used for mobility, Barthel Index for independence in activities of daily living, and modified Rankin Scale for total disability. Modified Charlston Comorbidity Index was used to assess comorbidity. Multivariate analysis was applied to evaluate the impact of recorded comorbidities on the patient functional outcome. Independent predictors of rehabilitation success in our study were the value of modified Charlston Comorbidity Index, atrial fibrillation and myocardial infarction. Our study demonstrated that patients with more comorbidities had worse functional outcome after stroke, so it is important to consider the comorbidity status when planning the rehabilitation treatment. Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6400340/ /pubmed/30256006 http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2018.57.01.01 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Original Scientific Papers
Simić-Panić, Dušica
Bošković, Ksenija
Milićević, Marija
Žikić, Tamara Rabi
Cvjetković Bošnjak, Mina
Tomašević-Todorović, Snežana
Jovićević, Mirjana
The Impact of Comorbidity on Rehabilitation Outcome After Ischemic Stroke
title The Impact of Comorbidity on Rehabilitation Outcome After Ischemic Stroke
title_full The Impact of Comorbidity on Rehabilitation Outcome After Ischemic Stroke
title_fullStr The Impact of Comorbidity on Rehabilitation Outcome After Ischemic Stroke
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Comorbidity on Rehabilitation Outcome After Ischemic Stroke
title_short The Impact of Comorbidity on Rehabilitation Outcome After Ischemic Stroke
title_sort impact of comorbidity on rehabilitation outcome after ischemic stroke
topic Original Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6400340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30256006
http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2018.57.01.01
work_keys_str_mv AT simicpanicdusica theimpactofcomorbidityonrehabilitationoutcomeafterischemicstroke
AT boskovicksenija theimpactofcomorbidityonrehabilitationoutcomeafterischemicstroke
AT milicevicmarija theimpactofcomorbidityonrehabilitationoutcomeafterischemicstroke
AT zikictamararabi theimpactofcomorbidityonrehabilitationoutcomeafterischemicstroke
AT cvjetkovicbosnjakmina theimpactofcomorbidityonrehabilitationoutcomeafterischemicstroke
AT tomasevictodorovicsnezana theimpactofcomorbidityonrehabilitationoutcomeafterischemicstroke
AT jovicevicmirjana theimpactofcomorbidityonrehabilitationoutcomeafterischemicstroke
AT simicpanicdusica impactofcomorbidityonrehabilitationoutcomeafterischemicstroke
AT boskovicksenija impactofcomorbidityonrehabilitationoutcomeafterischemicstroke
AT milicevicmarija impactofcomorbidityonrehabilitationoutcomeafterischemicstroke
AT zikictamararabi impactofcomorbidityonrehabilitationoutcomeafterischemicstroke
AT cvjetkovicbosnjakmina impactofcomorbidityonrehabilitationoutcomeafterischemicstroke
AT tomasevictodorovicsnezana impactofcomorbidityonrehabilitationoutcomeafterischemicstroke
AT jovicevicmirjana impactofcomorbidityonrehabilitationoutcomeafterischemicstroke