Cargando…

Two-body wear behavior of human enamel versus monolithic zirconia, lithium disilicate, ceramometal and composite resin

PURPOSE: To investigate and compare the surface roughness (SR), weight and height of monolithic zirconia (MZ), ceramometal (CM), lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LD), composite resin (CR), and their antagonistic human teeth enamel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 32 disc shaped specimens for the four test m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Habib, Syed Rashid, Alotaibi, Abdulaziz, Al Hazza, Nawaf, Allam, Yasser, AlGhazi, Mohammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6400707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30847046
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.1.23
_version_ 1783400009920675840
author Habib, Syed Rashid
Alotaibi, Abdulaziz
Al Hazza, Nawaf
Allam, Yasser
AlGhazi, Mohammad
author_facet Habib, Syed Rashid
Alotaibi, Abdulaziz
Al Hazza, Nawaf
Allam, Yasser
AlGhazi, Mohammad
author_sort Habib, Syed Rashid
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate and compare the surface roughness (SR), weight and height of monolithic zirconia (MZ), ceramometal (CM), lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LD), composite resin (CR), and their antagonistic human teeth enamel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 32 disc shaped specimens for the four test materials (n=8) and 32 premolars were prepared and randomly divided. SR, weight and height of the materials and the antagonist enamel were recorded before and after subjecting the specimens to 240,000 wear-cycles (49 N/0.8 Hz/5℃/50℃). SR, height, weight, and digital microscopic qualitative evaluation were measured. RESULTS: CM (0.23 + 0.08 µm) and LD (0.68 + 0.16 µm) exhibited the least and highest mean difference in the SR, respectively. ANOVA revealed significance (P=.001) between the materials for the SR. Paired T-Test showed significance (P<.05) for the pre- and post-SR for all the materials. For the antagonistic enamel, no significance (P=.987) was found between the groups. However, the pre- and post-SR values of all the enamel groups were significant (P<.05). Wear cycles had significant effect on enamel weight loss against all the materials (P<.05). CR and MZ showed the lowest and highest height loss of 0.14 mm and 0.46 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: MZ and CM are more resistant to SR against the enamel than LD and CR. Enamel worn against test materials showed similar SR. Significant variations in SR values for the tested materials (MZ, LD, CM, and CR) against the enamel were found. Wear simulation significantly affected the enamel weight loss against all the materials, and enamel antagonist against MZ and CM showed more height loss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6400707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64007072019-03-07 Two-body wear behavior of human enamel versus monolithic zirconia, lithium disilicate, ceramometal and composite resin Habib, Syed Rashid Alotaibi, Abdulaziz Al Hazza, Nawaf Allam, Yasser AlGhazi, Mohammad J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: To investigate and compare the surface roughness (SR), weight and height of monolithic zirconia (MZ), ceramometal (CM), lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LD), composite resin (CR), and their antagonistic human teeth enamel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 32 disc shaped specimens for the four test materials (n=8) and 32 premolars were prepared and randomly divided. SR, weight and height of the materials and the antagonist enamel were recorded before and after subjecting the specimens to 240,000 wear-cycles (49 N/0.8 Hz/5℃/50℃). SR, height, weight, and digital microscopic qualitative evaluation were measured. RESULTS: CM (0.23 + 0.08 µm) and LD (0.68 + 0.16 µm) exhibited the least and highest mean difference in the SR, respectively. ANOVA revealed significance (P=.001) between the materials for the SR. Paired T-Test showed significance (P<.05) for the pre- and post-SR for all the materials. For the antagonistic enamel, no significance (P=.987) was found between the groups. However, the pre- and post-SR values of all the enamel groups were significant (P<.05). Wear cycles had significant effect on enamel weight loss against all the materials (P<.05). CR and MZ showed the lowest and highest height loss of 0.14 mm and 0.46 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: MZ and CM are more resistant to SR against the enamel than LD and CR. Enamel worn against test materials showed similar SR. Significant variations in SR values for the tested materials (MZ, LD, CM, and CR) against the enamel were found. Wear simulation significantly affected the enamel weight loss against all the materials, and enamel antagonist against MZ and CM showed more height loss. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2019-02 2019-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6400707/ /pubmed/30847046 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.1.23 Text en © 2019 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Habib, Syed Rashid
Alotaibi, Abdulaziz
Al Hazza, Nawaf
Allam, Yasser
AlGhazi, Mohammad
Two-body wear behavior of human enamel versus monolithic zirconia, lithium disilicate, ceramometal and composite resin
title Two-body wear behavior of human enamel versus monolithic zirconia, lithium disilicate, ceramometal and composite resin
title_full Two-body wear behavior of human enamel versus monolithic zirconia, lithium disilicate, ceramometal and composite resin
title_fullStr Two-body wear behavior of human enamel versus monolithic zirconia, lithium disilicate, ceramometal and composite resin
title_full_unstemmed Two-body wear behavior of human enamel versus monolithic zirconia, lithium disilicate, ceramometal and composite resin
title_short Two-body wear behavior of human enamel versus monolithic zirconia, lithium disilicate, ceramometal and composite resin
title_sort two-body wear behavior of human enamel versus monolithic zirconia, lithium disilicate, ceramometal and composite resin
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6400707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30847046
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.1.23
work_keys_str_mv AT habibsyedrashid twobodywearbehaviorofhumanenamelversusmonolithiczirconialithiumdisilicateceramometalandcompositeresin
AT alotaibiabdulaziz twobodywearbehaviorofhumanenamelversusmonolithiczirconialithiumdisilicateceramometalandcompositeresin
AT alhazzanawaf twobodywearbehaviorofhumanenamelversusmonolithiczirconialithiumdisilicateceramometalandcompositeresin
AT allamyasser twobodywearbehaviorofhumanenamelversusmonolithiczirconialithiumdisilicateceramometalandcompositeresin
AT alghazimohammad twobodywearbehaviorofhumanenamelversusmonolithiczirconialithiumdisilicateceramometalandcompositeresin