Cargando…
Two-body wear behavior of human enamel versus monolithic zirconia, lithium disilicate, ceramometal and composite resin
PURPOSE: To investigate and compare the surface roughness (SR), weight and height of monolithic zirconia (MZ), ceramometal (CM), lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LD), composite resin (CR), and their antagonistic human teeth enamel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 32 disc shaped specimens for the four test m...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6400707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30847046 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.1.23 |
_version_ | 1783400009920675840 |
---|---|
author | Habib, Syed Rashid Alotaibi, Abdulaziz Al Hazza, Nawaf Allam, Yasser AlGhazi, Mohammad |
author_facet | Habib, Syed Rashid Alotaibi, Abdulaziz Al Hazza, Nawaf Allam, Yasser AlGhazi, Mohammad |
author_sort | Habib, Syed Rashid |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To investigate and compare the surface roughness (SR), weight and height of monolithic zirconia (MZ), ceramometal (CM), lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LD), composite resin (CR), and their antagonistic human teeth enamel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 32 disc shaped specimens for the four test materials (n=8) and 32 premolars were prepared and randomly divided. SR, weight and height of the materials and the antagonist enamel were recorded before and after subjecting the specimens to 240,000 wear-cycles (49 N/0.8 Hz/5℃/50℃). SR, height, weight, and digital microscopic qualitative evaluation were measured. RESULTS: CM (0.23 + 0.08 µm) and LD (0.68 + 0.16 µm) exhibited the least and highest mean difference in the SR, respectively. ANOVA revealed significance (P=.001) between the materials for the SR. Paired T-Test showed significance (P<.05) for the pre- and post-SR for all the materials. For the antagonistic enamel, no significance (P=.987) was found between the groups. However, the pre- and post-SR values of all the enamel groups were significant (P<.05). Wear cycles had significant effect on enamel weight loss against all the materials (P<.05). CR and MZ showed the lowest and highest height loss of 0.14 mm and 0.46 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: MZ and CM are more resistant to SR against the enamel than LD and CR. Enamel worn against test materials showed similar SR. Significant variations in SR values for the tested materials (MZ, LD, CM, and CR) against the enamel were found. Wear simulation significantly affected the enamel weight loss against all the materials, and enamel antagonist against MZ and CM showed more height loss. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6400707 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64007072019-03-07 Two-body wear behavior of human enamel versus monolithic zirconia, lithium disilicate, ceramometal and composite resin Habib, Syed Rashid Alotaibi, Abdulaziz Al Hazza, Nawaf Allam, Yasser AlGhazi, Mohammad J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: To investigate and compare the surface roughness (SR), weight and height of monolithic zirconia (MZ), ceramometal (CM), lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LD), composite resin (CR), and their antagonistic human teeth enamel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 32 disc shaped specimens for the four test materials (n=8) and 32 premolars were prepared and randomly divided. SR, weight and height of the materials and the antagonist enamel were recorded before and after subjecting the specimens to 240,000 wear-cycles (49 N/0.8 Hz/5℃/50℃). SR, height, weight, and digital microscopic qualitative evaluation were measured. RESULTS: CM (0.23 + 0.08 µm) and LD (0.68 + 0.16 µm) exhibited the least and highest mean difference in the SR, respectively. ANOVA revealed significance (P=.001) between the materials for the SR. Paired T-Test showed significance (P<.05) for the pre- and post-SR for all the materials. For the antagonistic enamel, no significance (P=.987) was found between the groups. However, the pre- and post-SR values of all the enamel groups were significant (P<.05). Wear cycles had significant effect on enamel weight loss against all the materials (P<.05). CR and MZ showed the lowest and highest height loss of 0.14 mm and 0.46 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: MZ and CM are more resistant to SR against the enamel than LD and CR. Enamel worn against test materials showed similar SR. Significant variations in SR values for the tested materials (MZ, LD, CM, and CR) against the enamel were found. Wear simulation significantly affected the enamel weight loss against all the materials, and enamel antagonist against MZ and CM showed more height loss. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2019-02 2019-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6400707/ /pubmed/30847046 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.1.23 Text en © 2019 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Habib, Syed Rashid Alotaibi, Abdulaziz Al Hazza, Nawaf Allam, Yasser AlGhazi, Mohammad Two-body wear behavior of human enamel versus monolithic zirconia, lithium disilicate, ceramometal and composite resin |
title | Two-body wear behavior of human enamel
versus monolithic zirconia, lithium disilicate,
ceramometal and composite resin |
title_full | Two-body wear behavior of human enamel
versus monolithic zirconia, lithium disilicate,
ceramometal and composite resin |
title_fullStr | Two-body wear behavior of human enamel
versus monolithic zirconia, lithium disilicate,
ceramometal and composite resin |
title_full_unstemmed | Two-body wear behavior of human enamel
versus monolithic zirconia, lithium disilicate,
ceramometal and composite resin |
title_short | Two-body wear behavior of human enamel
versus monolithic zirconia, lithium disilicate,
ceramometal and composite resin |
title_sort | two-body wear behavior of human enamel
versus monolithic zirconia, lithium disilicate,
ceramometal and composite resin |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6400707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30847046 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.1.23 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT habibsyedrashid twobodywearbehaviorofhumanenamelversusmonolithiczirconialithiumdisilicateceramometalandcompositeresin AT alotaibiabdulaziz twobodywearbehaviorofhumanenamelversusmonolithiczirconialithiumdisilicateceramometalandcompositeresin AT alhazzanawaf twobodywearbehaviorofhumanenamelversusmonolithiczirconialithiumdisilicateceramometalandcompositeresin AT allamyasser twobodywearbehaviorofhumanenamelversusmonolithiczirconialithiumdisilicateceramometalandcompositeresin AT alghazimohammad twobodywearbehaviorofhumanenamelversusmonolithiczirconialithiumdisilicateceramometalandcompositeresin |