Cargando…

The genetic vulnerability to cisplatin ototoxicity: a systematic review

Ototoxicity is one of the major side-effects of platinum-based chemotherapy, in particular cisplatin (cis-diammine dichloroplatinum II). To our knowledge, no systematic review has previously provided a quantitative summary estimate of the impact of genetics upon the risk of developing hearing loss....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tserga, Evangelia, Nandwani, Tara, Edvall, Niklas K., Bulla, Jan, Patel, Poulam, Canlon, Barbara, Cederroth, Christopher R., Baguley, David M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6401165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30837596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40138-z
_version_ 1783400110302953472
author Tserga, Evangelia
Nandwani, Tara
Edvall, Niklas K.
Bulla, Jan
Patel, Poulam
Canlon, Barbara
Cederroth, Christopher R.
Baguley, David M.
author_facet Tserga, Evangelia
Nandwani, Tara
Edvall, Niklas K.
Bulla, Jan
Patel, Poulam
Canlon, Barbara
Cederroth, Christopher R.
Baguley, David M.
author_sort Tserga, Evangelia
collection PubMed
description Ototoxicity is one of the major side-effects of platinum-based chemotherapy, in particular cisplatin (cis-diammine dichloroplatinum II). To our knowledge, no systematic review has previously provided a quantitative summary estimate of the impact of genetics upon the risk of developing hearing loss. We searched Embase, Medline, ASSIA, Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science, for studies documenting the genetic risk of ototoxicity in patients with cancer treated with cisplatin. Titles/abstracts and full texts were reviewed for inclusion. Meta-analytic estimates of risk (Odds Ratio) from the pooled data were calculated for studies that have been repeated twice or more. The search identified 3891 papers, of which 30 were included. The majority were retrospective (44%), ranging from n = 39 to n = 317, some including only patients younger than 25 years of age (33%), and some on both genders (80%). The most common cancers involved were osteosarcoma (53%), neuroblastoma (37%), prostate (17%) and reproductive (10%). Most studies performed genotyping, though only 5 studies performed genome-wide association studies. Nineteen single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 15 genes were repeated more than twice. Meta-analysis of group data indicated that rs1872328 on ACYP2, which plays a role in calcium homeostasis, increases the risk of ototoxicity by 4.61 (95% CI: 3.04–7.02; N = 696, p < 0.0001) as well as LRP2 rs4668123 shows a cumulated Odds Ratio of 3.53 (95% CI: 1.48–8.45; N = 118, p = 0.0059), which could not be evidenced in individual studies. Despite the evidence of heterogeneity across studies, these meta-analytic results from 30 studies are consistent with a view of a genetic predisposition to platinum-based chemotherapy mediated ototoxicity. These new findings are informative and encourage the genetic screening of cancer patients in order to identify patients with greater vulnerability of developing hearing loss, a condition having a potentially large impact on quality of life. More studies are needed, with larger sample size, in order to identify additional markers of ototoxic risk associated with platinum-based chemotherapy and investigate polygenic risks, where multiple markers may exacerbate the side-effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6401165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64011652019-03-07 The genetic vulnerability to cisplatin ototoxicity: a systematic review Tserga, Evangelia Nandwani, Tara Edvall, Niklas K. Bulla, Jan Patel, Poulam Canlon, Barbara Cederroth, Christopher R. Baguley, David M. Sci Rep Article Ototoxicity is one of the major side-effects of platinum-based chemotherapy, in particular cisplatin (cis-diammine dichloroplatinum II). To our knowledge, no systematic review has previously provided a quantitative summary estimate of the impact of genetics upon the risk of developing hearing loss. We searched Embase, Medline, ASSIA, Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science, for studies documenting the genetic risk of ototoxicity in patients with cancer treated with cisplatin. Titles/abstracts and full texts were reviewed for inclusion. Meta-analytic estimates of risk (Odds Ratio) from the pooled data were calculated for studies that have been repeated twice or more. The search identified 3891 papers, of which 30 were included. The majority were retrospective (44%), ranging from n = 39 to n = 317, some including only patients younger than 25 years of age (33%), and some on both genders (80%). The most common cancers involved were osteosarcoma (53%), neuroblastoma (37%), prostate (17%) and reproductive (10%). Most studies performed genotyping, though only 5 studies performed genome-wide association studies. Nineteen single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 15 genes were repeated more than twice. Meta-analysis of group data indicated that rs1872328 on ACYP2, which plays a role in calcium homeostasis, increases the risk of ototoxicity by 4.61 (95% CI: 3.04–7.02; N = 696, p < 0.0001) as well as LRP2 rs4668123 shows a cumulated Odds Ratio of 3.53 (95% CI: 1.48–8.45; N = 118, p = 0.0059), which could not be evidenced in individual studies. Despite the evidence of heterogeneity across studies, these meta-analytic results from 30 studies are consistent with a view of a genetic predisposition to platinum-based chemotherapy mediated ototoxicity. These new findings are informative and encourage the genetic screening of cancer patients in order to identify patients with greater vulnerability of developing hearing loss, a condition having a potentially large impact on quality of life. More studies are needed, with larger sample size, in order to identify additional markers of ototoxic risk associated with platinum-based chemotherapy and investigate polygenic risks, where multiple markers may exacerbate the side-effects. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6401165/ /pubmed/30837596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40138-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Tserga, Evangelia
Nandwani, Tara
Edvall, Niklas K.
Bulla, Jan
Patel, Poulam
Canlon, Barbara
Cederroth, Christopher R.
Baguley, David M.
The genetic vulnerability to cisplatin ototoxicity: a systematic review
title The genetic vulnerability to cisplatin ototoxicity: a systematic review
title_full The genetic vulnerability to cisplatin ototoxicity: a systematic review
title_fullStr The genetic vulnerability to cisplatin ototoxicity: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The genetic vulnerability to cisplatin ototoxicity: a systematic review
title_short The genetic vulnerability to cisplatin ototoxicity: a systematic review
title_sort genetic vulnerability to cisplatin ototoxicity: a systematic review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6401165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30837596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40138-z
work_keys_str_mv AT tsergaevangelia thegeneticvulnerabilitytocisplatinototoxicityasystematicreview
AT nandwanitara thegeneticvulnerabilitytocisplatinototoxicityasystematicreview
AT edvallniklask thegeneticvulnerabilitytocisplatinototoxicityasystematicreview
AT bullajan thegeneticvulnerabilitytocisplatinototoxicityasystematicreview
AT patelpoulam thegeneticvulnerabilitytocisplatinototoxicityasystematicreview
AT canlonbarbara thegeneticvulnerabilitytocisplatinototoxicityasystematicreview
AT cederrothchristopherr thegeneticvulnerabilitytocisplatinototoxicityasystematicreview
AT baguleydavidm thegeneticvulnerabilitytocisplatinototoxicityasystematicreview
AT tsergaevangelia geneticvulnerabilitytocisplatinototoxicityasystematicreview
AT nandwanitara geneticvulnerabilitytocisplatinototoxicityasystematicreview
AT edvallniklask geneticvulnerabilitytocisplatinototoxicityasystematicreview
AT bullajan geneticvulnerabilitytocisplatinototoxicityasystematicreview
AT patelpoulam geneticvulnerabilitytocisplatinototoxicityasystematicreview
AT canlonbarbara geneticvulnerabilitytocisplatinototoxicityasystematicreview
AT cederrothchristopherr geneticvulnerabilitytocisplatinototoxicityasystematicreview
AT baguleydavidm geneticvulnerabilitytocisplatinototoxicityasystematicreview