Cargando…

Combined oral contraceptive pill-exposure alone does not reduce the risk of bacterial vaginosis recurrence in a pilot randomised controlled trial

We conducted a pilot open-label randomised controlled trial of combined (oestrogen-progesterone) oral contraceptive pill (COCP)-exposure aimed to examine its effect on BV-recurrence following first-line antibiotics compared to antibiotics alone. Ninety-five women with symptomatic BV were prescribed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vodstrcil, Lenka A., Plummer, Ms Erica, Fairley, Christopher K., Tachedjian, Gilda, Law, Matthew G., Hocking, Jane S., Worthington, Ms Karen, Grant, Ms Mieken, Okoko, Nita, Bradshaw, Catriona S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6401172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30837554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39879-8
_version_ 1783400112386473984
author Vodstrcil, Lenka A.
Plummer, Ms Erica
Fairley, Christopher K.
Tachedjian, Gilda
Law, Matthew G.
Hocking, Jane S.
Worthington, Ms Karen
Grant, Ms Mieken
Okoko, Nita
Bradshaw, Catriona S.
author_facet Vodstrcil, Lenka A.
Plummer, Ms Erica
Fairley, Christopher K.
Tachedjian, Gilda
Law, Matthew G.
Hocking, Jane S.
Worthington, Ms Karen
Grant, Ms Mieken
Okoko, Nita
Bradshaw, Catriona S.
author_sort Vodstrcil, Lenka A.
collection PubMed
description We conducted a pilot open-label randomised controlled trial of combined (oestrogen-progesterone) oral contraceptive pill (COCP)-exposure aimed to examine its effect on BV-recurrence following first-line antibiotics compared to antibiotics alone. Ninety-five women with symptomatic BV were prescribed antibiotic therapy, randomised to COCP-exposure (intervention) or current non-hormonal contraceptive practices (control) and followed monthly for six-months or until BV-recurrence. Modified intention-to-treat methods requiring either ≥1 clinical (primary/Amsel-outcome) or ≥1 microbiological (secondary/Nugent-outcome) BV-recurrence assessment were applied to determine cumulative recurrence rates. Secondary Cox regression analyses assessed factors associated with recurrence in all women. 92/95 women randomised provided baseline requirements. BV-recurrence rates were similar in women randomised to the COCP (primary/Amsel-outcome: 10/100PY, 95%CI: 6,19/100PY) compared to controls (14/100PY, 95%CI: 9, 21/100PY, p = 0.471). In secondary analyses sex with the same pre-treatment regular sexual partner (RSP; Amsel: Adjusted Hazard Ratio [AHR] = 3.13, 95%CI: 1.41, 6.94, p = 0.005; Nugent: AHR = 2.97, 95%CI: 1.49, 5.83, p = 0.002) and BV-history (Amsel: AHR = 3.03, 95%CI: 1.14, 6.28; Nugent: AHR = 2.78, 95%CI: 1.22, 6.33) were associated with increased BV-recurrence. This pilot RCT of COCP-exposure did not improve BV cure but found sex with an RSP and BV-history were associated with recurrence, although impacted by sample size and attrition. These data indicate reinfection from an untreated RSP and persistence of BV-associated bacteria are integral to the pathogenesis of recurrence and may overwhelm potential beneficial effects of hormonal contraception on the vaginal microbiota.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6401172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64011722019-03-07 Combined oral contraceptive pill-exposure alone does not reduce the risk of bacterial vaginosis recurrence in a pilot randomised controlled trial Vodstrcil, Lenka A. Plummer, Ms Erica Fairley, Christopher K. Tachedjian, Gilda Law, Matthew G. Hocking, Jane S. Worthington, Ms Karen Grant, Ms Mieken Okoko, Nita Bradshaw, Catriona S. Sci Rep Article We conducted a pilot open-label randomised controlled trial of combined (oestrogen-progesterone) oral contraceptive pill (COCP)-exposure aimed to examine its effect on BV-recurrence following first-line antibiotics compared to antibiotics alone. Ninety-five women with symptomatic BV were prescribed antibiotic therapy, randomised to COCP-exposure (intervention) or current non-hormonal contraceptive practices (control) and followed monthly for six-months or until BV-recurrence. Modified intention-to-treat methods requiring either ≥1 clinical (primary/Amsel-outcome) or ≥1 microbiological (secondary/Nugent-outcome) BV-recurrence assessment were applied to determine cumulative recurrence rates. Secondary Cox regression analyses assessed factors associated with recurrence in all women. 92/95 women randomised provided baseline requirements. BV-recurrence rates were similar in women randomised to the COCP (primary/Amsel-outcome: 10/100PY, 95%CI: 6,19/100PY) compared to controls (14/100PY, 95%CI: 9, 21/100PY, p = 0.471). In secondary analyses sex with the same pre-treatment regular sexual partner (RSP; Amsel: Adjusted Hazard Ratio [AHR] = 3.13, 95%CI: 1.41, 6.94, p = 0.005; Nugent: AHR = 2.97, 95%CI: 1.49, 5.83, p = 0.002) and BV-history (Amsel: AHR = 3.03, 95%CI: 1.14, 6.28; Nugent: AHR = 2.78, 95%CI: 1.22, 6.33) were associated with increased BV-recurrence. This pilot RCT of COCP-exposure did not improve BV cure but found sex with an RSP and BV-history were associated with recurrence, although impacted by sample size and attrition. These data indicate reinfection from an untreated RSP and persistence of BV-associated bacteria are integral to the pathogenesis of recurrence and may overwhelm potential beneficial effects of hormonal contraception on the vaginal microbiota. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6401172/ /pubmed/30837554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39879-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Vodstrcil, Lenka A.
Plummer, Ms Erica
Fairley, Christopher K.
Tachedjian, Gilda
Law, Matthew G.
Hocking, Jane S.
Worthington, Ms Karen
Grant, Ms Mieken
Okoko, Nita
Bradshaw, Catriona S.
Combined oral contraceptive pill-exposure alone does not reduce the risk of bacterial vaginosis recurrence in a pilot randomised controlled trial
title Combined oral contraceptive pill-exposure alone does not reduce the risk of bacterial vaginosis recurrence in a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_full Combined oral contraceptive pill-exposure alone does not reduce the risk of bacterial vaginosis recurrence in a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Combined oral contraceptive pill-exposure alone does not reduce the risk of bacterial vaginosis recurrence in a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Combined oral contraceptive pill-exposure alone does not reduce the risk of bacterial vaginosis recurrence in a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_short Combined oral contraceptive pill-exposure alone does not reduce the risk of bacterial vaginosis recurrence in a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_sort combined oral contraceptive pill-exposure alone does not reduce the risk of bacterial vaginosis recurrence in a pilot randomised controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6401172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30837554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39879-8
work_keys_str_mv AT vodstrcillenkaa combinedoralcontraceptivepillexposurealonedoesnotreducetheriskofbacterialvaginosisrecurrenceinapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT plummermserica combinedoralcontraceptivepillexposurealonedoesnotreducetheriskofbacterialvaginosisrecurrenceinapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fairleychristopherk combinedoralcontraceptivepillexposurealonedoesnotreducetheriskofbacterialvaginosisrecurrenceinapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tachedjiangilda combinedoralcontraceptivepillexposurealonedoesnotreducetheriskofbacterialvaginosisrecurrenceinapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lawmatthewg combinedoralcontraceptivepillexposurealonedoesnotreducetheriskofbacterialvaginosisrecurrenceinapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hockingjanes combinedoralcontraceptivepillexposurealonedoesnotreducetheriskofbacterialvaginosisrecurrenceinapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT worthingtonmskaren combinedoralcontraceptivepillexposurealonedoesnotreducetheriskofbacterialvaginosisrecurrenceinapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT grantmsmieken combinedoralcontraceptivepillexposurealonedoesnotreducetheriskofbacterialvaginosisrecurrenceinapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT okokonita combinedoralcontraceptivepillexposurealonedoesnotreducetheriskofbacterialvaginosisrecurrenceinapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bradshawcatrionas combinedoralcontraceptivepillexposurealonedoesnotreducetheriskofbacterialvaginosisrecurrenceinapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial