Cargando…

How to Improve Performance in Bayesian Inference Tasks: A Comparison of Five Visualizations

Bayes’ formula is a fundamental statistical method for inference judgments in uncertain situations used by both laymen and professionals. However, since people often fail in situations where Bayes’ formula can be applied, how to improve their performance in Bayesian situations is a crucial question....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Böcherer-Linder, Katharina, Eichler, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6401595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30873061
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00267
_version_ 1783400174472658944
author Böcherer-Linder, Katharina
Eichler, Andreas
author_facet Böcherer-Linder, Katharina
Eichler, Andreas
author_sort Böcherer-Linder, Katharina
collection PubMed
description Bayes’ formula is a fundamental statistical method for inference judgments in uncertain situations used by both laymen and professionals. However, since people often fail in situations where Bayes’ formula can be applied, how to improve their performance in Bayesian situations is a crucial question. We based our research on a widely accepted beneficial strategy in Bayesian situations, representing the statistical information in the form of natural frequencies. In addition to this numerical format, we used five visualizations: a 2 × 2-table, a unit square, an icon array, a tree diagram, and a double-tree diagram. In an experiment with 688 undergraduate students, we empirically investigated the effectiveness of three graphical properties of visualizations: area-proportionality, use of discrete and countable statistical entities, and graphical transparency of the nested-sets structure. We found no additional beneficial effect of area proportionality. In contrast, the representation of discrete objects seems to be beneficial. Furthermore, our results show a strong facilitating effect of making the nested-sets structure of a Bayesian situation graphically transparent. Our results contribute to answering the questions of how and why a visualization could facilitate judgment and decision making in situations of uncertainty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6401595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64015952019-03-14 How to Improve Performance in Bayesian Inference Tasks: A Comparison of Five Visualizations Böcherer-Linder, Katharina Eichler, Andreas Front Psychol Psychology Bayes’ formula is a fundamental statistical method for inference judgments in uncertain situations used by both laymen and professionals. However, since people often fail in situations where Bayes’ formula can be applied, how to improve their performance in Bayesian situations is a crucial question. We based our research on a widely accepted beneficial strategy in Bayesian situations, representing the statistical information in the form of natural frequencies. In addition to this numerical format, we used five visualizations: a 2 × 2-table, a unit square, an icon array, a tree diagram, and a double-tree diagram. In an experiment with 688 undergraduate students, we empirically investigated the effectiveness of three graphical properties of visualizations: area-proportionality, use of discrete and countable statistical entities, and graphical transparency of the nested-sets structure. We found no additional beneficial effect of area proportionality. In contrast, the representation of discrete objects seems to be beneficial. Furthermore, our results show a strong facilitating effect of making the nested-sets structure of a Bayesian situation graphically transparent. Our results contribute to answering the questions of how and why a visualization could facilitate judgment and decision making in situations of uncertainty. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6401595/ /pubmed/30873061 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00267 Text en Copyright © 2019 Böcherer-Linder and Eichler. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Böcherer-Linder, Katharina
Eichler, Andreas
How to Improve Performance in Bayesian Inference Tasks: A Comparison of Five Visualizations
title How to Improve Performance in Bayesian Inference Tasks: A Comparison of Five Visualizations
title_full How to Improve Performance in Bayesian Inference Tasks: A Comparison of Five Visualizations
title_fullStr How to Improve Performance in Bayesian Inference Tasks: A Comparison of Five Visualizations
title_full_unstemmed How to Improve Performance in Bayesian Inference Tasks: A Comparison of Five Visualizations
title_short How to Improve Performance in Bayesian Inference Tasks: A Comparison of Five Visualizations
title_sort how to improve performance in bayesian inference tasks: a comparison of five visualizations
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6401595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30873061
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00267
work_keys_str_mv AT bochererlinderkatharina howtoimproveperformanceinbayesianinferencetasksacomparisonoffivevisualizations
AT eichlerandreas howtoimproveperformanceinbayesianinferencetasksacomparisonoffivevisualizations