Cargando…

Sex comparisons of agonist and antagonist muscle electromyographic parameters during two different submaximal isometric fatiguing tasks

To examine the task failure time of the force‐ and position‐based submaximal elbow flexion fatiguing tasks for both sexes, twelve men and eight women visited the laboratory for two separate experimental occasions. During the experiment, they pulled against a rigid restraint for the force task and ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeon, Sunggun, Ye, Xin, Miller, William M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6401663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30839175
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14022
_version_ 1783400194331639808
author Jeon, Sunggun
Ye, Xin
Miller, William M.
author_facet Jeon, Sunggun
Ye, Xin
Miller, William M.
author_sort Jeon, Sunggun
collection PubMed
description To examine the task failure time of the force‐ and position‐based submaximal elbow flexion fatiguing tasks for both sexes, twelve men and eight women visited the laboratory for two separate experimental occasions. During the experiment, they pulled against a rigid restraint for the force task and maintained a constant elbow joint angle to support an equivalent inertial load for the position task. For both fatiguing tasks (50% of the isometric strength at the elbow joint angle of 135 degree), the task failure time, along with the surface electromyographic (EMG) amplitude and mean frequency (MNF) were measured. The average failure time was longer for the force task than that for the position task (sexes combined: 39.6 ± 16.6 sec vs. 33.9 ± 14.9 sec, P = 0.033). In addition, men were overall less fatigable than women (tasks combined: 42.0 ± 14.7 sec vs. 28.7 ± 10.3 sec, P = 0.020). The multiple regression analyses showed that the task failure time in women was solely predicted by the rate of change of the triceps EMG MNF. Thus, more fatigability of women in this study was likely due to the quicker fatiguing rate of the antagonist triceps brachii muscle. Different from most previous studies that have used 90‐degree elbow joint angle, the current 135‐degree joint angle setup might have created a situation where greater muscle activity from the related muscles (e.g., the antagonist) were required for women than for men to stabilize the joint, thereby resulting in a shorter task failure time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6401663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64016632019-03-18 Sex comparisons of agonist and antagonist muscle electromyographic parameters during two different submaximal isometric fatiguing tasks Jeon, Sunggun Ye, Xin Miller, William M. Physiol Rep Original Research To examine the task failure time of the force‐ and position‐based submaximal elbow flexion fatiguing tasks for both sexes, twelve men and eight women visited the laboratory for two separate experimental occasions. During the experiment, they pulled against a rigid restraint for the force task and maintained a constant elbow joint angle to support an equivalent inertial load for the position task. For both fatiguing tasks (50% of the isometric strength at the elbow joint angle of 135 degree), the task failure time, along with the surface electromyographic (EMG) amplitude and mean frequency (MNF) were measured. The average failure time was longer for the force task than that for the position task (sexes combined: 39.6 ± 16.6 sec vs. 33.9 ± 14.9 sec, P = 0.033). In addition, men were overall less fatigable than women (tasks combined: 42.0 ± 14.7 sec vs. 28.7 ± 10.3 sec, P = 0.020). The multiple regression analyses showed that the task failure time in women was solely predicted by the rate of change of the triceps EMG MNF. Thus, more fatigability of women in this study was likely due to the quicker fatiguing rate of the antagonist triceps brachii muscle. Different from most previous studies that have used 90‐degree elbow joint angle, the current 135‐degree joint angle setup might have created a situation where greater muscle activity from the related muscles (e.g., the antagonist) were required for women than for men to stabilize the joint, thereby resulting in a shorter task failure time. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6401663/ /pubmed/30839175 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14022 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Jeon, Sunggun
Ye, Xin
Miller, William M.
Sex comparisons of agonist and antagonist muscle electromyographic parameters during two different submaximal isometric fatiguing tasks
title Sex comparisons of agonist and antagonist muscle electromyographic parameters during two different submaximal isometric fatiguing tasks
title_full Sex comparisons of agonist and antagonist muscle electromyographic parameters during two different submaximal isometric fatiguing tasks
title_fullStr Sex comparisons of agonist and antagonist muscle electromyographic parameters during two different submaximal isometric fatiguing tasks
title_full_unstemmed Sex comparisons of agonist and antagonist muscle electromyographic parameters during two different submaximal isometric fatiguing tasks
title_short Sex comparisons of agonist and antagonist muscle electromyographic parameters during two different submaximal isometric fatiguing tasks
title_sort sex comparisons of agonist and antagonist muscle electromyographic parameters during two different submaximal isometric fatiguing tasks
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6401663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30839175
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14022
work_keys_str_mv AT jeonsunggun sexcomparisonsofagonistandantagonistmuscleelectromyographicparametersduringtwodifferentsubmaximalisometricfatiguingtasks
AT yexin sexcomparisonsofagonistandantagonistmuscleelectromyographicparametersduringtwodifferentsubmaximalisometricfatiguingtasks
AT millerwilliamm sexcomparisonsofagonistandantagonistmuscleelectromyographicparametersduringtwodifferentsubmaximalisometricfatiguingtasks