Cargando…
Sex comparisons of agonist and antagonist muscle electromyographic parameters during two different submaximal isometric fatiguing tasks
To examine the task failure time of the force‐ and position‐based submaximal elbow flexion fatiguing tasks for both sexes, twelve men and eight women visited the laboratory for two separate experimental occasions. During the experiment, they pulled against a rigid restraint for the force task and ma...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6401663/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30839175 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14022 |
_version_ | 1783400194331639808 |
---|---|
author | Jeon, Sunggun Ye, Xin Miller, William M. |
author_facet | Jeon, Sunggun Ye, Xin Miller, William M. |
author_sort | Jeon, Sunggun |
collection | PubMed |
description | To examine the task failure time of the force‐ and position‐based submaximal elbow flexion fatiguing tasks for both sexes, twelve men and eight women visited the laboratory for two separate experimental occasions. During the experiment, they pulled against a rigid restraint for the force task and maintained a constant elbow joint angle to support an equivalent inertial load for the position task. For both fatiguing tasks (50% of the isometric strength at the elbow joint angle of 135 degree), the task failure time, along with the surface electromyographic (EMG) amplitude and mean frequency (MNF) were measured. The average failure time was longer for the force task than that for the position task (sexes combined: 39.6 ± 16.6 sec vs. 33.9 ± 14.9 sec, P = 0.033). In addition, men were overall less fatigable than women (tasks combined: 42.0 ± 14.7 sec vs. 28.7 ± 10.3 sec, P = 0.020). The multiple regression analyses showed that the task failure time in women was solely predicted by the rate of change of the triceps EMG MNF. Thus, more fatigability of women in this study was likely due to the quicker fatiguing rate of the antagonist triceps brachii muscle. Different from most previous studies that have used 90‐degree elbow joint angle, the current 135‐degree joint angle setup might have created a situation where greater muscle activity from the related muscles (e.g., the antagonist) were required for women than for men to stabilize the joint, thereby resulting in a shorter task failure time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6401663 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64016632019-03-18 Sex comparisons of agonist and antagonist muscle electromyographic parameters during two different submaximal isometric fatiguing tasks Jeon, Sunggun Ye, Xin Miller, William M. Physiol Rep Original Research To examine the task failure time of the force‐ and position‐based submaximal elbow flexion fatiguing tasks for both sexes, twelve men and eight women visited the laboratory for two separate experimental occasions. During the experiment, they pulled against a rigid restraint for the force task and maintained a constant elbow joint angle to support an equivalent inertial load for the position task. For both fatiguing tasks (50% of the isometric strength at the elbow joint angle of 135 degree), the task failure time, along with the surface electromyographic (EMG) amplitude and mean frequency (MNF) were measured. The average failure time was longer for the force task than that for the position task (sexes combined: 39.6 ± 16.6 sec vs. 33.9 ± 14.9 sec, P = 0.033). In addition, men were overall less fatigable than women (tasks combined: 42.0 ± 14.7 sec vs. 28.7 ± 10.3 sec, P = 0.020). The multiple regression analyses showed that the task failure time in women was solely predicted by the rate of change of the triceps EMG MNF. Thus, more fatigability of women in this study was likely due to the quicker fatiguing rate of the antagonist triceps brachii muscle. Different from most previous studies that have used 90‐degree elbow joint angle, the current 135‐degree joint angle setup might have created a situation where greater muscle activity from the related muscles (e.g., the antagonist) were required for women than for men to stabilize the joint, thereby resulting in a shorter task failure time. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6401663/ /pubmed/30839175 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14022 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Jeon, Sunggun Ye, Xin Miller, William M. Sex comparisons of agonist and antagonist muscle electromyographic parameters during two different submaximal isometric fatiguing tasks |
title | Sex comparisons of agonist and antagonist muscle electromyographic parameters during two different submaximal isometric fatiguing tasks |
title_full | Sex comparisons of agonist and antagonist muscle electromyographic parameters during two different submaximal isometric fatiguing tasks |
title_fullStr | Sex comparisons of agonist and antagonist muscle electromyographic parameters during two different submaximal isometric fatiguing tasks |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex comparisons of agonist and antagonist muscle electromyographic parameters during two different submaximal isometric fatiguing tasks |
title_short | Sex comparisons of agonist and antagonist muscle electromyographic parameters during two different submaximal isometric fatiguing tasks |
title_sort | sex comparisons of agonist and antagonist muscle electromyographic parameters during two different submaximal isometric fatiguing tasks |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6401663/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30839175 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jeonsunggun sexcomparisonsofagonistandantagonistmuscleelectromyographicparametersduringtwodifferentsubmaximalisometricfatiguingtasks AT yexin sexcomparisonsofagonistandantagonistmuscleelectromyographicparametersduringtwodifferentsubmaximalisometricfatiguingtasks AT millerwilliamm sexcomparisonsofagonistandantagonistmuscleelectromyographicparametersduringtwodifferentsubmaximalisometricfatiguingtasks |