Cargando…

Difference in Macroscopic Morphologies of Amylosic Supramolecular Networks Depending on Guest Polymers in Vine-Twining Polymerization

Amylose, a natural polysaccharide, acts as a host molecule to form supramolecular inclusion complexes in its enzymatically formation process, that is, phosphorylase-catalyzed enzymatic polymerization using the α-d-glucose 1-phosphate monomer and the maltooligosaccharide primer, in the presence of ap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orio, Saya, Shoji, Takuya, Yamamoto, Kazuya, Kadokawa, Jun-ichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6401710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30961202
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym10111277
_version_ 1783400209028481024
author Orio, Saya
Shoji, Takuya
Yamamoto, Kazuya
Kadokawa, Jun-ichi
author_facet Orio, Saya
Shoji, Takuya
Yamamoto, Kazuya
Kadokawa, Jun-ichi
author_sort Orio, Saya
collection PubMed
description Amylose, a natural polysaccharide, acts as a host molecule to form supramolecular inclusion complexes in its enzymatically formation process, that is, phosphorylase-catalyzed enzymatic polymerization using the α-d-glucose 1-phosphate monomer and the maltooligosaccharide primer, in the presence of appropriate guest polymers (vine-twining polymerization). Furthermore, in the vine-twining polymerization using maltooligosaccharide primer-grafted polymers, such as maltoheptaose (G(7))-grafted poly(γ-glutamic acid) (PGA), in the presence of poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL), the enzymatically elongated amylose graft chains have formed inclusion complexes with PCL among the PGA main-chains to construct supramolecular networks. Either hydrogelation or aggregation as a macroscopic morphology from the products was observed in accordance with PCL/primer feed ratios. In this study, we evaluated macroscopic morphologies from such amylosic supramolecular networks with different guest polymers in the vine-twining polymerization using G(7)-grafted PGA in the presence of polytetrahydrofuran (PTHF), PCL, and poly(l-lactide) (PLLA). Consequently, we found that the reaction mixture using PTHF totally turned into a hydrogel form, whereas the products using PCL and PLLA were aggregated in the reaction mixtures. The produced networks were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopic measurements. The difference in the macroscopic morphologies was reasonably explained by stabilities of the complexes depending on the guest polymers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6401710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64017102019-04-02 Difference in Macroscopic Morphologies of Amylosic Supramolecular Networks Depending on Guest Polymers in Vine-Twining Polymerization Orio, Saya Shoji, Takuya Yamamoto, Kazuya Kadokawa, Jun-ichi Polymers (Basel) Article Amylose, a natural polysaccharide, acts as a host molecule to form supramolecular inclusion complexes in its enzymatically formation process, that is, phosphorylase-catalyzed enzymatic polymerization using the α-d-glucose 1-phosphate monomer and the maltooligosaccharide primer, in the presence of appropriate guest polymers (vine-twining polymerization). Furthermore, in the vine-twining polymerization using maltooligosaccharide primer-grafted polymers, such as maltoheptaose (G(7))-grafted poly(γ-glutamic acid) (PGA), in the presence of poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL), the enzymatically elongated amylose graft chains have formed inclusion complexes with PCL among the PGA main-chains to construct supramolecular networks. Either hydrogelation or aggregation as a macroscopic morphology from the products was observed in accordance with PCL/primer feed ratios. In this study, we evaluated macroscopic morphologies from such amylosic supramolecular networks with different guest polymers in the vine-twining polymerization using G(7)-grafted PGA in the presence of polytetrahydrofuran (PTHF), PCL, and poly(l-lactide) (PLLA). Consequently, we found that the reaction mixture using PTHF totally turned into a hydrogel form, whereas the products using PCL and PLLA were aggregated in the reaction mixtures. The produced networks were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopic measurements. The difference in the macroscopic morphologies was reasonably explained by stabilities of the complexes depending on the guest polymers. MDPI 2018-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6401710/ /pubmed/30961202 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym10111277 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Orio, Saya
Shoji, Takuya
Yamamoto, Kazuya
Kadokawa, Jun-ichi
Difference in Macroscopic Morphologies of Amylosic Supramolecular Networks Depending on Guest Polymers in Vine-Twining Polymerization
title Difference in Macroscopic Morphologies of Amylosic Supramolecular Networks Depending on Guest Polymers in Vine-Twining Polymerization
title_full Difference in Macroscopic Morphologies of Amylosic Supramolecular Networks Depending on Guest Polymers in Vine-Twining Polymerization
title_fullStr Difference in Macroscopic Morphologies of Amylosic Supramolecular Networks Depending on Guest Polymers in Vine-Twining Polymerization
title_full_unstemmed Difference in Macroscopic Morphologies of Amylosic Supramolecular Networks Depending on Guest Polymers in Vine-Twining Polymerization
title_short Difference in Macroscopic Morphologies of Amylosic Supramolecular Networks Depending on Guest Polymers in Vine-Twining Polymerization
title_sort difference in macroscopic morphologies of amylosic supramolecular networks depending on guest polymers in vine-twining polymerization
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6401710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30961202
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym10111277
work_keys_str_mv AT oriosaya differenceinmacroscopicmorphologiesofamylosicsupramolecularnetworksdependingonguestpolymersinvinetwiningpolymerization
AT shojitakuya differenceinmacroscopicmorphologiesofamylosicsupramolecularnetworksdependingonguestpolymersinvinetwiningpolymerization
AT yamamotokazuya differenceinmacroscopicmorphologiesofamylosicsupramolecularnetworksdependingonguestpolymersinvinetwiningpolymerization
AT kadokawajunichi differenceinmacroscopicmorphologiesofamylosicsupramolecularnetworksdependingonguestpolymersinvinetwiningpolymerization