Cargando…

Comparing 3 Different Techniques of Patella Fracture Fixation and Their Complications

INTRODUCTION: Patella fractures managed by fixation with metal implants often cause local soft tissue irritation and necessitate implant removal. An alternative is to utilize suture-based fixation methods. We have adopted suture and hybrid fixation in the routine management of patella fractures. Her...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shea, Graham Ka-Hon, Hoi-Ting So, Karen, Tam, Kin-Wai, Yee, Dennis King-Hang, Fang, Christian, Leung, Frankie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6402069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30858993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151459319827143
_version_ 1783400309421244416
author Shea, Graham Ka-Hon
Hoi-Ting So, Karen
Tam, Kin-Wai
Yee, Dennis King-Hang
Fang, Christian
Leung, Frankie
author_facet Shea, Graham Ka-Hon
Hoi-Ting So, Karen
Tam, Kin-Wai
Yee, Dennis King-Hang
Fang, Christian
Leung, Frankie
author_sort Shea, Graham Ka-Hon
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Patella fractures managed by fixation with metal implants often cause local soft tissue irritation and necessitate implant removal. An alternative is to utilize suture-based fixation methods. We have adopted suture and hybrid fixation in the routine management of patella fractures. Here, we compare the results of 3 fixation techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-seven eligible patients underwent patella fracture fixation over a 3-year period. As determined by fracture configuration, patients received (1) suture fixation (transosseous sutures and figure-of-eight tension banding with FiberWire), (2) hybrid fixation (transosseous FiberWire sutures and metal tension banding), or (3) metal fixation. Primary outcome measures included reoperation rate and soft tissue irritation. Secondary outcomes included surgical complications, radiological, and functional parameters. RESULTS: Reoperation rate was highest for metal fixation (25/57, 43.9%) and lowest for suture fixation (2/13, 15.4%). Soft tissue irritation necessitating implant removal was the predominant reason for reoperation and was significantly less prevalent following suture fixation (1/13, 7.7%, P < .01). Hybrid fixation resulted in similar rates of soft tissue irritation (6/17, 35.3%) and implant removal (7/17, 41.2%) as compared to metal fixation. There was a significant increase in patella baja (13/17, 76.5%) and reduction in Insall-Salvati ratio (0.742; 95% confidence interval: 0.682-0.802) following hybrid fixation as compared to the other 2 fixation methods (P < .05). DISCUSSION: Suture fixation results in the least amount of soft tissue irritation and lowest reoperation rate, but these advantages are negated with the addition of a metal tension band wire. Hybrid fixation also unbalances the extensor mechanism. CONCLUSION: Patients should be counseled as to the expected sequelae of their fixation method. Suture fixation is the favored means to fix distal pole fractures of the patella. An additional metal tension band loop may confer additional stability but should be applied with caution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6402069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64020692019-03-11 Comparing 3 Different Techniques of Patella Fracture Fixation and Their Complications Shea, Graham Ka-Hon Hoi-Ting So, Karen Tam, Kin-Wai Yee, Dennis King-Hang Fang, Christian Leung, Frankie Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil Article INTRODUCTION: Patella fractures managed by fixation with metal implants often cause local soft tissue irritation and necessitate implant removal. An alternative is to utilize suture-based fixation methods. We have adopted suture and hybrid fixation in the routine management of patella fractures. Here, we compare the results of 3 fixation techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-seven eligible patients underwent patella fracture fixation over a 3-year period. As determined by fracture configuration, patients received (1) suture fixation (transosseous sutures and figure-of-eight tension banding with FiberWire), (2) hybrid fixation (transosseous FiberWire sutures and metal tension banding), or (3) metal fixation. Primary outcome measures included reoperation rate and soft tissue irritation. Secondary outcomes included surgical complications, radiological, and functional parameters. RESULTS: Reoperation rate was highest for metal fixation (25/57, 43.9%) and lowest for suture fixation (2/13, 15.4%). Soft tissue irritation necessitating implant removal was the predominant reason for reoperation and was significantly less prevalent following suture fixation (1/13, 7.7%, P < .01). Hybrid fixation resulted in similar rates of soft tissue irritation (6/17, 35.3%) and implant removal (7/17, 41.2%) as compared to metal fixation. There was a significant increase in patella baja (13/17, 76.5%) and reduction in Insall-Salvati ratio (0.742; 95% confidence interval: 0.682-0.802) following hybrid fixation as compared to the other 2 fixation methods (P < .05). DISCUSSION: Suture fixation results in the least amount of soft tissue irritation and lowest reoperation rate, but these advantages are negated with the addition of a metal tension band wire. Hybrid fixation also unbalances the extensor mechanism. CONCLUSION: Patients should be counseled as to the expected sequelae of their fixation method. Suture fixation is the favored means to fix distal pole fractures of the patella. An additional metal tension band loop may confer additional stability but should be applied with caution. SAGE Publications 2019-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6402069/ /pubmed/30858993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151459319827143 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Shea, Graham Ka-Hon
Hoi-Ting So, Karen
Tam, Kin-Wai
Yee, Dennis King-Hang
Fang, Christian
Leung, Frankie
Comparing 3 Different Techniques of Patella Fracture Fixation and Their Complications
title Comparing 3 Different Techniques of Patella Fracture Fixation and Their Complications
title_full Comparing 3 Different Techniques of Patella Fracture Fixation and Their Complications
title_fullStr Comparing 3 Different Techniques of Patella Fracture Fixation and Their Complications
title_full_unstemmed Comparing 3 Different Techniques of Patella Fracture Fixation and Their Complications
title_short Comparing 3 Different Techniques of Patella Fracture Fixation and Their Complications
title_sort comparing 3 different techniques of patella fracture fixation and their complications
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6402069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30858993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151459319827143
work_keys_str_mv AT sheagrahamkahon comparing3differenttechniquesofpatellafracturefixationandtheircomplications
AT hoitingsokaren comparing3differenttechniquesofpatellafracturefixationandtheircomplications
AT tamkinwai comparing3differenttechniquesofpatellafracturefixationandtheircomplications
AT yeedenniskinghang comparing3differenttechniquesofpatellafracturefixationandtheircomplications
AT fangchristian comparing3differenttechniquesofpatellafracturefixationandtheircomplications
AT leungfrankie comparing3differenttechniquesofpatellafracturefixationandtheircomplications