Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of a cluster-randomized, culturally tailored, community health worker home-visiting diabetes intervention versus standard care in American Samoa

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is highly prevalent in American Samoa. Community health worker (CHW) interventions may improve T2DM care and be cost-effective. Current cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) of CHW interventions have either overlooked important cost considerations or not been...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Shuo J., Galárraga, Omar, Smith, Kelley A., Fuimaono, Saipale, McGarvey, Stephen T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6402127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30836964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0356-6
_version_ 1783400326278152192
author Huang, Shuo J.
Galárraga, Omar
Smith, Kelley A.
Fuimaono, Saipale
McGarvey, Stephen T.
author_facet Huang, Shuo J.
Galárraga, Omar
Smith, Kelley A.
Fuimaono, Saipale
McGarvey, Stephen T.
author_sort Huang, Shuo J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is highly prevalent in American Samoa. Community health worker (CHW) interventions may improve T2DM care and be cost-effective. Current cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) of CHW interventions have either overlooked important cost considerations or not been based on randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The Diabetes Care in American Samoa (DCAS) intervention which occurred in 2009–2010 was a cluster-randomized, culturally tailored, home-visiting CHW intervention and improved HbA1c levels. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the cost-effectiveness of the DCAS intervention against standard care using a RCT in a low-resource setting. METHODS: We collected clinical, utilization, and cost data over 2 years and modeled quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained based on the RCT glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) improvements. We calculated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) from the societal perspective over a 2-year time horizon and reported all costs in 2012 USD ($). RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-eight American Samoans diagnosed with T2DM were cluster randomized into the CHW (n = 104) or standard care control (n = 164) arms. The CHW arm had a mean reduction of 0.53% in HbA1c, an increase of $594 in cost, and an increase of 0.05 QALYs. The ICER for the CHW arm compared to the control arm was $1121 per percentage point HbA1c reduced and $13 191 per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to a variety of willingness-to-pay thresholds from $39 000 to $154 353 per QALY gained, this ICER shows that the CHW intervention is highly cost-effective. Future studies of the cost-effectiveness of CHW T2DM interventions in similar settings should model lifetime costs and QALYs gained to better assess long-term cost-effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID NCT00850824. Registered 9 February 2009, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00850824. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12960-019-0356-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6402127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64021272019-03-14 Cost-effectiveness analysis of a cluster-randomized, culturally tailored, community health worker home-visiting diabetes intervention versus standard care in American Samoa Huang, Shuo J. Galárraga, Omar Smith, Kelley A. Fuimaono, Saipale McGarvey, Stephen T. Hum Resour Health Research BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is highly prevalent in American Samoa. Community health worker (CHW) interventions may improve T2DM care and be cost-effective. Current cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) of CHW interventions have either overlooked important cost considerations or not been based on randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The Diabetes Care in American Samoa (DCAS) intervention which occurred in 2009–2010 was a cluster-randomized, culturally tailored, home-visiting CHW intervention and improved HbA1c levels. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the cost-effectiveness of the DCAS intervention against standard care using a RCT in a low-resource setting. METHODS: We collected clinical, utilization, and cost data over 2 years and modeled quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained based on the RCT glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) improvements. We calculated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) from the societal perspective over a 2-year time horizon and reported all costs in 2012 USD ($). RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-eight American Samoans diagnosed with T2DM were cluster randomized into the CHW (n = 104) or standard care control (n = 164) arms. The CHW arm had a mean reduction of 0.53% in HbA1c, an increase of $594 in cost, and an increase of 0.05 QALYs. The ICER for the CHW arm compared to the control arm was $1121 per percentage point HbA1c reduced and $13 191 per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to a variety of willingness-to-pay thresholds from $39 000 to $154 353 per QALY gained, this ICER shows that the CHW intervention is highly cost-effective. Future studies of the cost-effectiveness of CHW T2DM interventions in similar settings should model lifetime costs and QALYs gained to better assess long-term cost-effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID NCT00850824. Registered 9 February 2009, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00850824. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12960-019-0356-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6402127/ /pubmed/30836964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0356-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Huang, Shuo J.
Galárraga, Omar
Smith, Kelley A.
Fuimaono, Saipale
McGarvey, Stephen T.
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a cluster-randomized, culturally tailored, community health worker home-visiting diabetes intervention versus standard care in American Samoa
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of a cluster-randomized, culturally tailored, community health worker home-visiting diabetes intervention versus standard care in American Samoa
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of a cluster-randomized, culturally tailored, community health worker home-visiting diabetes intervention versus standard care in American Samoa
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of a cluster-randomized, culturally tailored, community health worker home-visiting diabetes intervention versus standard care in American Samoa
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of a cluster-randomized, culturally tailored, community health worker home-visiting diabetes intervention versus standard care in American Samoa
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of a cluster-randomized, culturally tailored, community health worker home-visiting diabetes intervention versus standard care in American Samoa
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of a cluster-randomized, culturally tailored, community health worker home-visiting diabetes intervention versus standard care in american samoa
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6402127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30836964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0356-6
work_keys_str_mv AT huangshuoj costeffectivenessanalysisofaclusterrandomizedculturallytailoredcommunityhealthworkerhomevisitingdiabetesinterventionversusstandardcareinamericansamoa
AT galarragaomar costeffectivenessanalysisofaclusterrandomizedculturallytailoredcommunityhealthworkerhomevisitingdiabetesinterventionversusstandardcareinamericansamoa
AT smithkelleya costeffectivenessanalysisofaclusterrandomizedculturallytailoredcommunityhealthworkerhomevisitingdiabetesinterventionversusstandardcareinamericansamoa
AT fuimaonosaipale costeffectivenessanalysisofaclusterrandomizedculturallytailoredcommunityhealthworkerhomevisitingdiabetesinterventionversusstandardcareinamericansamoa
AT mcgarveystephent costeffectivenessanalysisofaclusterrandomizedculturallytailoredcommunityhealthworkerhomevisitingdiabetesinterventionversusstandardcareinamericansamoa