Cargando…
Increased cancer risk after myocardial infarction: fact or fiction? A systemic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: Accumulating evidences showed some positive relations between myocardial infarction (MI) and new onset cancer. We aim to investigate whether MI is associated with an increased risk of incident cancer. METHODS: A comprehensive literature list was identified from MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6402436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881121 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S193658 |
_version_ | 1783400398069956608 |
---|---|
author | Li, Na Huang, Zhigang Zhang, Yanda Sun, Haitao Wang, Jiamei Zhao, Jian |
author_facet | Li, Na Huang, Zhigang Zhang, Yanda Sun, Haitao Wang, Jiamei Zhao, Jian |
author_sort | Li, Na |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Accumulating evidences showed some positive relations between myocardial infarction (MI) and new onset cancer. We aim to investigate whether MI is associated with an increased risk of incident cancer. METHODS: A comprehensive literature list was identified from MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception until October 2018. The main inclusion criteria included observational studies investigating the association between MI and new onset cancer. Stata 12.0 software was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of 862 potentially relevant studies, five cohort studies met all inclusion criteria. The pooled cancer incidence rate was 9.5% (95% CI=8.3–10.7%). Pooled analysis of OR showed that the increased overall cancer risk in MI patients in comparison with controls had no statistical significance (OR=1.08; 95% CI=0.97–1.19, P=0.153). Subgroup analysis by gender demonstrated that the overall cancer risk was only significantly increased in female (OR=1.10; 95% CI=1.01–1.20, P=0.025), but not in male patients (OR=1.04; 95% CI=0.99–1.10, P=0.124). In terms of cancer type, the increased cancer risk was only significant for lung cancer (male OR=1.12; 95% CI=1.05–1.19, P<0.01; and female OR=1.51; 95% CI=1.15–1.99, P<0.01), but not for prostate (OR=0.96; 95% CI=0.85–1.09, P=0.546) or breast cancer (OR=0.94; 95% CI=0.86–1.04, P=0.222). In addition, the increased cancer risk was only significant in the first 6 months (OR=1.93; 95% CI=1.42–2.63, P<0.01) but not in 6 months–1-year (OR=1.03; 95% CI=0.92–1.15, P=0.627) or >1-year (OR=0.98; 95% CI=0.93–1.04, P=0.585) follow-up after MI. CONCLUSION: From available evidence, the increased overall cancer risk after MI was only significant in female but not in male patients. Besides, the increased cancer risk could be driven by increased short-term cancer incidence after MI and certain cancer types such as lung cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6402436 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64024362019-03-16 Increased cancer risk after myocardial infarction: fact or fiction? A systemic review and meta-analysis Li, Na Huang, Zhigang Zhang, Yanda Sun, Haitao Wang, Jiamei Zhao, Jian Cancer Manag Res Original Research OBJECTIVE: Accumulating evidences showed some positive relations between myocardial infarction (MI) and new onset cancer. We aim to investigate whether MI is associated with an increased risk of incident cancer. METHODS: A comprehensive literature list was identified from MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception until October 2018. The main inclusion criteria included observational studies investigating the association between MI and new onset cancer. Stata 12.0 software was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of 862 potentially relevant studies, five cohort studies met all inclusion criteria. The pooled cancer incidence rate was 9.5% (95% CI=8.3–10.7%). Pooled analysis of OR showed that the increased overall cancer risk in MI patients in comparison with controls had no statistical significance (OR=1.08; 95% CI=0.97–1.19, P=0.153). Subgroup analysis by gender demonstrated that the overall cancer risk was only significantly increased in female (OR=1.10; 95% CI=1.01–1.20, P=0.025), but not in male patients (OR=1.04; 95% CI=0.99–1.10, P=0.124). In terms of cancer type, the increased cancer risk was only significant for lung cancer (male OR=1.12; 95% CI=1.05–1.19, P<0.01; and female OR=1.51; 95% CI=1.15–1.99, P<0.01), but not for prostate (OR=0.96; 95% CI=0.85–1.09, P=0.546) or breast cancer (OR=0.94; 95% CI=0.86–1.04, P=0.222). In addition, the increased cancer risk was only significant in the first 6 months (OR=1.93; 95% CI=1.42–2.63, P<0.01) but not in 6 months–1-year (OR=1.03; 95% CI=0.92–1.15, P=0.627) or >1-year (OR=0.98; 95% CI=0.93–1.04, P=0.585) follow-up after MI. CONCLUSION: From available evidence, the increased overall cancer risk after MI was only significant in female but not in male patients. Besides, the increased cancer risk could be driven by increased short-term cancer incidence after MI and certain cancer types such as lung cancer. Dove Medical Press 2019-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6402436/ /pubmed/30881121 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S193658 Text en © 2019 Li et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Li, Na Huang, Zhigang Zhang, Yanda Sun, Haitao Wang, Jiamei Zhao, Jian Increased cancer risk after myocardial infarction: fact or fiction? A systemic review and meta-analysis |
title | Increased cancer risk after myocardial infarction: fact or fiction? A systemic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Increased cancer risk after myocardial infarction: fact or fiction? A systemic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Increased cancer risk after myocardial infarction: fact or fiction? A systemic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Increased cancer risk after myocardial infarction: fact or fiction? A systemic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Increased cancer risk after myocardial infarction: fact or fiction? A systemic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | increased cancer risk after myocardial infarction: fact or fiction? a systemic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6402436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881121 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S193658 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lina increasedcancerriskaftermyocardialinfarctionfactorfictionasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT huangzhigang increasedcancerriskaftermyocardialinfarctionfactorfictionasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangyanda increasedcancerriskaftermyocardialinfarctionfactorfictionasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sunhaitao increasedcancerriskaftermyocardialinfarctionfactorfictionasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangjiamei increasedcancerriskaftermyocardialinfarctionfactorfictionasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhaojian increasedcancerriskaftermyocardialinfarctionfactorfictionasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis |