Cargando…

Increased cancer risk after myocardial infarction: fact or fiction? A systemic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: Accumulating evidences showed some positive relations between myocardial infarction (MI) and new onset cancer. We aim to investigate whether MI is associated with an increased risk of incident cancer. METHODS: A comprehensive literature list was identified from MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Na, Huang, Zhigang, Zhang, Yanda, Sun, Haitao, Wang, Jiamei, Zhao, Jian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6402436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881121
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S193658
_version_ 1783400398069956608
author Li, Na
Huang, Zhigang
Zhang, Yanda
Sun, Haitao
Wang, Jiamei
Zhao, Jian
author_facet Li, Na
Huang, Zhigang
Zhang, Yanda
Sun, Haitao
Wang, Jiamei
Zhao, Jian
author_sort Li, Na
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Accumulating evidences showed some positive relations between myocardial infarction (MI) and new onset cancer. We aim to investigate whether MI is associated with an increased risk of incident cancer. METHODS: A comprehensive literature list was identified from MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception until October 2018. The main inclusion criteria included observational studies investigating the association between MI and new onset cancer. Stata 12.0 software was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of 862 potentially relevant studies, five cohort studies met all inclusion criteria. The pooled cancer incidence rate was 9.5% (95% CI=8.3–10.7%). Pooled analysis of OR showed that the increased overall cancer risk in MI patients in comparison with controls had no statistical significance (OR=1.08; 95% CI=0.97–1.19, P=0.153). Subgroup analysis by gender demonstrated that the overall cancer risk was only significantly increased in female (OR=1.10; 95% CI=1.01–1.20, P=0.025), but not in male patients (OR=1.04; 95% CI=0.99–1.10, P=0.124). In terms of cancer type, the increased cancer risk was only significant for lung cancer (male OR=1.12; 95% CI=1.05–1.19, P<0.01; and female OR=1.51; 95% CI=1.15–1.99, P<0.01), but not for prostate (OR=0.96; 95% CI=0.85–1.09, P=0.546) or breast cancer (OR=0.94; 95% CI=0.86–1.04, P=0.222). In addition, the increased cancer risk was only significant in the first 6 months (OR=1.93; 95% CI=1.42–2.63, P<0.01) but not in 6 months–1-year (OR=1.03; 95% CI=0.92–1.15, P=0.627) or >1-year (OR=0.98; 95% CI=0.93–1.04, P=0.585) follow-up after MI. CONCLUSION: From available evidence, the increased overall cancer risk after MI was only significant in female but not in male patients. Besides, the increased cancer risk could be driven by increased short-term cancer incidence after MI and certain cancer types such as lung cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6402436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64024362019-03-16 Increased cancer risk after myocardial infarction: fact or fiction? A systemic review and meta-analysis Li, Na Huang, Zhigang Zhang, Yanda Sun, Haitao Wang, Jiamei Zhao, Jian Cancer Manag Res Original Research OBJECTIVE: Accumulating evidences showed some positive relations between myocardial infarction (MI) and new onset cancer. We aim to investigate whether MI is associated with an increased risk of incident cancer. METHODS: A comprehensive literature list was identified from MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception until October 2018. The main inclusion criteria included observational studies investigating the association between MI and new onset cancer. Stata 12.0 software was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of 862 potentially relevant studies, five cohort studies met all inclusion criteria. The pooled cancer incidence rate was 9.5% (95% CI=8.3–10.7%). Pooled analysis of OR showed that the increased overall cancer risk in MI patients in comparison with controls had no statistical significance (OR=1.08; 95% CI=0.97–1.19, P=0.153). Subgroup analysis by gender demonstrated that the overall cancer risk was only significantly increased in female (OR=1.10; 95% CI=1.01–1.20, P=0.025), but not in male patients (OR=1.04; 95% CI=0.99–1.10, P=0.124). In terms of cancer type, the increased cancer risk was only significant for lung cancer (male OR=1.12; 95% CI=1.05–1.19, P<0.01; and female OR=1.51; 95% CI=1.15–1.99, P<0.01), but not for prostate (OR=0.96; 95% CI=0.85–1.09, P=0.546) or breast cancer (OR=0.94; 95% CI=0.86–1.04, P=0.222). In addition, the increased cancer risk was only significant in the first 6 months (OR=1.93; 95% CI=1.42–2.63, P<0.01) but not in 6 months–1-year (OR=1.03; 95% CI=0.92–1.15, P=0.627) or >1-year (OR=0.98; 95% CI=0.93–1.04, P=0.585) follow-up after MI. CONCLUSION: From available evidence, the increased overall cancer risk after MI was only significant in female but not in male patients. Besides, the increased cancer risk could be driven by increased short-term cancer incidence after MI and certain cancer types such as lung cancer. Dove Medical Press 2019-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6402436/ /pubmed/30881121 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S193658 Text en © 2019 Li et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Li, Na
Huang, Zhigang
Zhang, Yanda
Sun, Haitao
Wang, Jiamei
Zhao, Jian
Increased cancer risk after myocardial infarction: fact or fiction? A systemic review and meta-analysis
title Increased cancer risk after myocardial infarction: fact or fiction? A systemic review and meta-analysis
title_full Increased cancer risk after myocardial infarction: fact or fiction? A systemic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Increased cancer risk after myocardial infarction: fact or fiction? A systemic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Increased cancer risk after myocardial infarction: fact or fiction? A systemic review and meta-analysis
title_short Increased cancer risk after myocardial infarction: fact or fiction? A systemic review and meta-analysis
title_sort increased cancer risk after myocardial infarction: fact or fiction? a systemic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6402436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881121
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S193658
work_keys_str_mv AT lina increasedcancerriskaftermyocardialinfarctionfactorfictionasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huangzhigang increasedcancerriskaftermyocardialinfarctionfactorfictionasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangyanda increasedcancerriskaftermyocardialinfarctionfactorfictionasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sunhaitao increasedcancerriskaftermyocardialinfarctionfactorfictionasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangjiamei increasedcancerriskaftermyocardialinfarctionfactorfictionasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaojian increasedcancerriskaftermyocardialinfarctionfactorfictionasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis