Cargando…

On the Calculation of Sample Entropy Using Continuous and Discrete Human Gait Data

Sample entropy (SE) has relative consistency using biologically-derived, discrete data >500 data points. For certain populations, collecting this quantity is not feasible and continuous data has been used. The effect of using continuous versus discrete data on SE is unknown, nor are the relative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCamley, John D., Denton, William, Arnold, Andrew, Raffalt, Peter C., Yentes, Jennifer M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6402504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30853788
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e20100764
_version_ 1783400410712637440
author McCamley, John D.
Denton, William
Arnold, Andrew
Raffalt, Peter C.
Yentes, Jennifer M.
author_facet McCamley, John D.
Denton, William
Arnold, Andrew
Raffalt, Peter C.
Yentes, Jennifer M.
author_sort McCamley, John D.
collection PubMed
description Sample entropy (SE) has relative consistency using biologically-derived, discrete data >500 data points. For certain populations, collecting this quantity is not feasible and continuous data has been used. The effect of using continuous versus discrete data on SE is unknown, nor are the relative effects of sampling rate and input parameters m (comparison vector length) and r (tolerance). Eleven subjects walked for 10-minutes and continuous joint angles (480 Hz) were calculated for each lower-extremity joint. Data were downsampled (240, 120, 60 Hz) and discrete range-of-motion was calculated. SE was quantified for angles and range-of-motion at all sampling rates and multiple combinations of parameters. A differential relationship between joints was observed between range-of-motion and joint angles. Range-of-motion SE showed no difference; whereas, joint angle SE significantly decreased from ankle to knee to hip. To confirm findings from biological data, continuous signals with manipulations to frequency, amplitude, and both were generated and underwent similar analysis to the biological data. In general, changes to m, r, and sampling rate had a greater effect on continuous compared to discrete data. Discrete data was robust to sampling rate and m. It is recommended that different data types not be compared and discrete data be used for SE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6402504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64025042019-03-06 On the Calculation of Sample Entropy Using Continuous and Discrete Human Gait Data McCamley, John D. Denton, William Arnold, Andrew Raffalt, Peter C. Yentes, Jennifer M. Entropy (Basel) Article Sample entropy (SE) has relative consistency using biologically-derived, discrete data >500 data points. For certain populations, collecting this quantity is not feasible and continuous data has been used. The effect of using continuous versus discrete data on SE is unknown, nor are the relative effects of sampling rate and input parameters m (comparison vector length) and r (tolerance). Eleven subjects walked for 10-minutes and continuous joint angles (480 Hz) were calculated for each lower-extremity joint. Data were downsampled (240, 120, 60 Hz) and discrete range-of-motion was calculated. SE was quantified for angles and range-of-motion at all sampling rates and multiple combinations of parameters. A differential relationship between joints was observed between range-of-motion and joint angles. Range-of-motion SE showed no difference; whereas, joint angle SE significantly decreased from ankle to knee to hip. To confirm findings from biological data, continuous signals with manipulations to frequency, amplitude, and both were generated and underwent similar analysis to the biological data. In general, changes to m, r, and sampling rate had a greater effect on continuous compared to discrete data. Discrete data was robust to sampling rate and m. It is recommended that different data types not be compared and discrete data be used for SE. MDPI 2018-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6402504/ /pubmed/30853788 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e20100764 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
McCamley, John D.
Denton, William
Arnold, Andrew
Raffalt, Peter C.
Yentes, Jennifer M.
On the Calculation of Sample Entropy Using Continuous and Discrete Human Gait Data
title On the Calculation of Sample Entropy Using Continuous and Discrete Human Gait Data
title_full On the Calculation of Sample Entropy Using Continuous and Discrete Human Gait Data
title_fullStr On the Calculation of Sample Entropy Using Continuous and Discrete Human Gait Data
title_full_unstemmed On the Calculation of Sample Entropy Using Continuous and Discrete Human Gait Data
title_short On the Calculation of Sample Entropy Using Continuous and Discrete Human Gait Data
title_sort on the calculation of sample entropy using continuous and discrete human gait data
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6402504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30853788
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e20100764
work_keys_str_mv AT mccamleyjohnd onthecalculationofsampleentropyusingcontinuousanddiscretehumangaitdata
AT dentonwilliam onthecalculationofsampleentropyusingcontinuousanddiscretehumangaitdata
AT arnoldandrew onthecalculationofsampleentropyusingcontinuousanddiscretehumangaitdata
AT raffaltpeterc onthecalculationofsampleentropyusingcontinuousanddiscretehumangaitdata
AT yentesjenniferm onthecalculationofsampleentropyusingcontinuousanddiscretehumangaitdata