Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of an innovative model of care for chronic wounds patients

Current provision of services for the care of chronic wounds in Australia is disjointed and costly. There is large variability in the way that services are provided, and little evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of a specialist model of care for treatment and management. A decision-analytic m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brain, David, Tulleners, Ruth, Lee, Xing, Cheng, Qinglu, Graves, Nicholas, Pacella, Rosana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6402622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30840658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212366
_version_ 1783400428544720896
author Brain, David
Tulleners, Ruth
Lee, Xing
Cheng, Qinglu
Graves, Nicholas
Pacella, Rosana
author_facet Brain, David
Tulleners, Ruth
Lee, Xing
Cheng, Qinglu
Graves, Nicholas
Pacella, Rosana
author_sort Brain, David
collection PubMed
description Current provision of services for the care of chronic wounds in Australia is disjointed and costly. There is large variability in the way that services are provided, and little evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of a specialist model of care for treatment and management. A decision-analytic model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a specialist wound care clinic as compared to usual care for chronic wounds is presented. We use retrospective and prospective data from a cohort of patients as well as information from administrative databases and published literature. Our results show specialist wound clinics are cost-effective for the management of chronic wounds. On average, specialist clinics were $3,947 cheaper than usual clinics and resulted in a quality adjusted life year gain of 0.04 per patient, per year. Specialist clinics were the best option under multiple scenarios including a different cost perspective and when the cost of a hospital admission was reduced. Current models of care are inefficient and represent low value care, and specialist wound clinics represent a good investment compared to current approaches for the management of chronic wounds in Australia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6402622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64026222019-03-17 Cost-effectiveness analysis of an innovative model of care for chronic wounds patients Brain, David Tulleners, Ruth Lee, Xing Cheng, Qinglu Graves, Nicholas Pacella, Rosana PLoS One Research Article Current provision of services for the care of chronic wounds in Australia is disjointed and costly. There is large variability in the way that services are provided, and little evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of a specialist model of care for treatment and management. A decision-analytic model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a specialist wound care clinic as compared to usual care for chronic wounds is presented. We use retrospective and prospective data from a cohort of patients as well as information from administrative databases and published literature. Our results show specialist wound clinics are cost-effective for the management of chronic wounds. On average, specialist clinics were $3,947 cheaper than usual clinics and resulted in a quality adjusted life year gain of 0.04 per patient, per year. Specialist clinics were the best option under multiple scenarios including a different cost perspective and when the cost of a hospital admission was reduced. Current models of care are inefficient and represent low value care, and specialist wound clinics represent a good investment compared to current approaches for the management of chronic wounds in Australia. Public Library of Science 2019-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6402622/ /pubmed/30840658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212366 Text en © 2019 Brain et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brain, David
Tulleners, Ruth
Lee, Xing
Cheng, Qinglu
Graves, Nicholas
Pacella, Rosana
Cost-effectiveness analysis of an innovative model of care for chronic wounds patients
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of an innovative model of care for chronic wounds patients
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of an innovative model of care for chronic wounds patients
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of an innovative model of care for chronic wounds patients
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of an innovative model of care for chronic wounds patients
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of an innovative model of care for chronic wounds patients
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of an innovative model of care for chronic wounds patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6402622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30840658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212366
work_keys_str_mv AT braindavid costeffectivenessanalysisofaninnovativemodelofcareforchronicwoundspatients
AT tullenersruth costeffectivenessanalysisofaninnovativemodelofcareforchronicwoundspatients
AT leexing costeffectivenessanalysisofaninnovativemodelofcareforchronicwoundspatients
AT chengqinglu costeffectivenessanalysisofaninnovativemodelofcareforchronicwoundspatients
AT gravesnicholas costeffectivenessanalysisofaninnovativemodelofcareforchronicwoundspatients
AT pacellarosana costeffectivenessanalysisofaninnovativemodelofcareforchronicwoundspatients