Cargando…

An experimental examination of cognitive processes and response inhibition in patients seeking treatment for buying-shopping disorder

There is an ongoing debate about whether buying-shopping disorder (BSD) should be acknowledged as a behavioral addiction. The current study investigated if mechanisms that play a prominent role in disorders due to substance use or addictive behaviors are relevant in BSD, particularly cue reactivity,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vogel, Birte, Trotzke, Patrick, Steins-Loeber, Sabine, Schäfer, Giulia, Stenger, Jana, de Zwaan, Martina, Brand, Matthias, Müller, Astrid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6402626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30840643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212415
_version_ 1783400429901578240
author Vogel, Birte
Trotzke, Patrick
Steins-Loeber, Sabine
Schäfer, Giulia
Stenger, Jana
de Zwaan, Martina
Brand, Matthias
Müller, Astrid
author_facet Vogel, Birte
Trotzke, Patrick
Steins-Loeber, Sabine
Schäfer, Giulia
Stenger, Jana
de Zwaan, Martina
Brand, Matthias
Müller, Astrid
author_sort Vogel, Birte
collection PubMed
description There is an ongoing debate about whether buying-shopping disorder (BSD) should be acknowledged as a behavioral addiction. The current study investigated if mechanisms that play a prominent role in disorders due to substance use or addictive behaviors are relevant in BSD, particularly cue reactivity, craving, cognitive bias and reduced inhibitory control regarding addiction-relevant cues. The study included 39 treatment-seeking patients with BSD and 39 healthy control (HC) participants (29 women and 10 men in each group). Subjective responses toward buying/shopping-relevant visual cues were compared in patients vs. control participants. Experimental paradigms with neutral and semi-individualized buying/shopping-related pictures were administered to assess attentional bias, implicit associations and response inhibition with respect to different visual cues: Dot-probe paradigm (DPP), Implicit Association Task (IAT), Go/nogo-task (GNG). The severity of BSD, craving for buying/shopping, and symptoms of comorbid mental disorders (anxiety, depressive and hoarding disorders) were measured using standardized questionnaires. The BSD-group showed more general craving for buying/shopping, stronger subjective craving reactions towards buying/shopping-related visual cues, and more symptoms of anxiety, depression and hoarding disorder than control participants. Task performance in the DPP, IAT and GNG paradigm did not differ between the two groups. The present findings confirm previous research concerning the crucial role of craving in BSD. The assumption that attentional bias, implicit associations and deficient inhibitory control with respect to buying/shopping-related cues are relevant in BSD could not be proven. Future research should address methodological shortcomings and investigate the impact of acute psychosocial stress and present mood on craving responses, cognitive processing, and response inhibition in patients with BSD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6402626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64026262019-03-17 An experimental examination of cognitive processes and response inhibition in patients seeking treatment for buying-shopping disorder Vogel, Birte Trotzke, Patrick Steins-Loeber, Sabine Schäfer, Giulia Stenger, Jana de Zwaan, Martina Brand, Matthias Müller, Astrid PLoS One Research Article There is an ongoing debate about whether buying-shopping disorder (BSD) should be acknowledged as a behavioral addiction. The current study investigated if mechanisms that play a prominent role in disorders due to substance use or addictive behaviors are relevant in BSD, particularly cue reactivity, craving, cognitive bias and reduced inhibitory control regarding addiction-relevant cues. The study included 39 treatment-seeking patients with BSD and 39 healthy control (HC) participants (29 women and 10 men in each group). Subjective responses toward buying/shopping-relevant visual cues were compared in patients vs. control participants. Experimental paradigms with neutral and semi-individualized buying/shopping-related pictures were administered to assess attentional bias, implicit associations and response inhibition with respect to different visual cues: Dot-probe paradigm (DPP), Implicit Association Task (IAT), Go/nogo-task (GNG). The severity of BSD, craving for buying/shopping, and symptoms of comorbid mental disorders (anxiety, depressive and hoarding disorders) were measured using standardized questionnaires. The BSD-group showed more general craving for buying/shopping, stronger subjective craving reactions towards buying/shopping-related visual cues, and more symptoms of anxiety, depression and hoarding disorder than control participants. Task performance in the DPP, IAT and GNG paradigm did not differ between the two groups. The present findings confirm previous research concerning the crucial role of craving in BSD. The assumption that attentional bias, implicit associations and deficient inhibitory control with respect to buying/shopping-related cues are relevant in BSD could not be proven. Future research should address methodological shortcomings and investigate the impact of acute psychosocial stress and present mood on craving responses, cognitive processing, and response inhibition in patients with BSD. Public Library of Science 2019-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6402626/ /pubmed/30840643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212415 Text en © 2019 Vogel et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vogel, Birte
Trotzke, Patrick
Steins-Loeber, Sabine
Schäfer, Giulia
Stenger, Jana
de Zwaan, Martina
Brand, Matthias
Müller, Astrid
An experimental examination of cognitive processes and response inhibition in patients seeking treatment for buying-shopping disorder
title An experimental examination of cognitive processes and response inhibition in patients seeking treatment for buying-shopping disorder
title_full An experimental examination of cognitive processes and response inhibition in patients seeking treatment for buying-shopping disorder
title_fullStr An experimental examination of cognitive processes and response inhibition in patients seeking treatment for buying-shopping disorder
title_full_unstemmed An experimental examination of cognitive processes and response inhibition in patients seeking treatment for buying-shopping disorder
title_short An experimental examination of cognitive processes and response inhibition in patients seeking treatment for buying-shopping disorder
title_sort experimental examination of cognitive processes and response inhibition in patients seeking treatment for buying-shopping disorder
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6402626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30840643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212415
work_keys_str_mv AT vogelbirte anexperimentalexaminationofcognitiveprocessesandresponseinhibitioninpatientsseekingtreatmentforbuyingshoppingdisorder
AT trotzkepatrick anexperimentalexaminationofcognitiveprocessesandresponseinhibitioninpatientsseekingtreatmentforbuyingshoppingdisorder
AT steinsloebersabine anexperimentalexaminationofcognitiveprocessesandresponseinhibitioninpatientsseekingtreatmentforbuyingshoppingdisorder
AT schafergiulia anexperimentalexaminationofcognitiveprocessesandresponseinhibitioninpatientsseekingtreatmentforbuyingshoppingdisorder
AT stengerjana anexperimentalexaminationofcognitiveprocessesandresponseinhibitioninpatientsseekingtreatmentforbuyingshoppingdisorder
AT dezwaanmartina anexperimentalexaminationofcognitiveprocessesandresponseinhibitioninpatientsseekingtreatmentforbuyingshoppingdisorder
AT brandmatthias anexperimentalexaminationofcognitiveprocessesandresponseinhibitioninpatientsseekingtreatmentforbuyingshoppingdisorder
AT mullerastrid anexperimentalexaminationofcognitiveprocessesandresponseinhibitioninpatientsseekingtreatmentforbuyingshoppingdisorder
AT vogelbirte experimentalexaminationofcognitiveprocessesandresponseinhibitioninpatientsseekingtreatmentforbuyingshoppingdisorder
AT trotzkepatrick experimentalexaminationofcognitiveprocessesandresponseinhibitioninpatientsseekingtreatmentforbuyingshoppingdisorder
AT steinsloebersabine experimentalexaminationofcognitiveprocessesandresponseinhibitioninpatientsseekingtreatmentforbuyingshoppingdisorder
AT schafergiulia experimentalexaminationofcognitiveprocessesandresponseinhibitioninpatientsseekingtreatmentforbuyingshoppingdisorder
AT stengerjana experimentalexaminationofcognitiveprocessesandresponseinhibitioninpatientsseekingtreatmentforbuyingshoppingdisorder
AT dezwaanmartina experimentalexaminationofcognitiveprocessesandresponseinhibitioninpatientsseekingtreatmentforbuyingshoppingdisorder
AT brandmatthias experimentalexaminationofcognitiveprocessesandresponseinhibitioninpatientsseekingtreatmentforbuyingshoppingdisorder
AT mullerastrid experimentalexaminationofcognitiveprocessesandresponseinhibitioninpatientsseekingtreatmentforbuyingshoppingdisorder