Cargando…

How is women’s demand for caesarean section measured? A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND: Caesarean section rates are increasing worldwide, and since the 2000s, several researchers have investigated women’s demand for caesarean sections. QUESTION: The aim of this article was to review and summarise published studies investigating caesarean section demand and to describe the m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schantz, Clémence, de Loenzien, Myriam, Goyet, Sophie, Ravit, Marion, Dancoisne, Aurélien, Dumont, Alexandre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6402700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30840678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213352
_version_ 1783400452002414592
author Schantz, Clémence
de Loenzien, Myriam
Goyet, Sophie
Ravit, Marion
Dancoisne, Aurélien
Dumont, Alexandre
author_facet Schantz, Clémence
de Loenzien, Myriam
Goyet, Sophie
Ravit, Marion
Dancoisne, Aurélien
Dumont, Alexandre
author_sort Schantz, Clémence
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Caesarean section rates are increasing worldwide, and since the 2000s, several researchers have investigated women’s demand for caesarean sections. QUESTION: The aim of this article was to review and summarise published studies investigating caesarean section demand and to describe the methodologies, outcomes, country characteristics and country income levels in these studies. METHODS: This is a systematic review of studies published between 2000 and 2017 in French and English that quantitatively measured women’s demand for caesarean sections. We carried out a systematic search using the Medline database in PubMed. FINDINGS: The search strategy identified 390 studies, 41 of which met the final inclusion criteria, representing a total sample of 3 774 458 women. We identified two different study designs, i.e., cross-sectional studies and prospective cohort studies, that are commonly used to measure social demand for caesarean sections. Two different types of outcomes were reported, i.e., the preferences of pregnant or non-pregnant women regarding the method of childbirth in the future and caesarean delivery following maternal request. No study measured demand for caesarean section during the childbirth process. All included studies were conducted in middle- (n = 24) and high-income countries (n = 17), and no study performed in a low-income country was found. DISCUSSION: Measuring caesarean section demand is challenging, and the structural violence leading to demand for caesarean section during childbirth while in the labour ward remains invisible. In addition, the caesarean section demand in low-income countries remains unclear due to the lack of studies conducted in these countries. CONCLUSION: We recommend conducting prospective cohort studies to describe the social construction of caesarean section demand. We also recommend conducting studies in low-income countries because demand for caesarean sections in these countries is rarely investigated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6402700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64027002019-03-17 How is women’s demand for caesarean section measured? A systematic literature review Schantz, Clémence de Loenzien, Myriam Goyet, Sophie Ravit, Marion Dancoisne, Aurélien Dumont, Alexandre PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Caesarean section rates are increasing worldwide, and since the 2000s, several researchers have investigated women’s demand for caesarean sections. QUESTION: The aim of this article was to review and summarise published studies investigating caesarean section demand and to describe the methodologies, outcomes, country characteristics and country income levels in these studies. METHODS: This is a systematic review of studies published between 2000 and 2017 in French and English that quantitatively measured women’s demand for caesarean sections. We carried out a systematic search using the Medline database in PubMed. FINDINGS: The search strategy identified 390 studies, 41 of which met the final inclusion criteria, representing a total sample of 3 774 458 women. We identified two different study designs, i.e., cross-sectional studies and prospective cohort studies, that are commonly used to measure social demand for caesarean sections. Two different types of outcomes were reported, i.e., the preferences of pregnant or non-pregnant women regarding the method of childbirth in the future and caesarean delivery following maternal request. No study measured demand for caesarean section during the childbirth process. All included studies were conducted in middle- (n = 24) and high-income countries (n = 17), and no study performed in a low-income country was found. DISCUSSION: Measuring caesarean section demand is challenging, and the structural violence leading to demand for caesarean section during childbirth while in the labour ward remains invisible. In addition, the caesarean section demand in low-income countries remains unclear due to the lack of studies conducted in these countries. CONCLUSION: We recommend conducting prospective cohort studies to describe the social construction of caesarean section demand. We also recommend conducting studies in low-income countries because demand for caesarean sections in these countries is rarely investigated. Public Library of Science 2019-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6402700/ /pubmed/30840678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213352 Text en © 2019 Schantz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schantz, Clémence
de Loenzien, Myriam
Goyet, Sophie
Ravit, Marion
Dancoisne, Aurélien
Dumont, Alexandre
How is women’s demand for caesarean section measured? A systematic literature review
title How is women’s demand for caesarean section measured? A systematic literature review
title_full How is women’s demand for caesarean section measured? A systematic literature review
title_fullStr How is women’s demand for caesarean section measured? A systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed How is women’s demand for caesarean section measured? A systematic literature review
title_short How is women’s demand for caesarean section measured? A systematic literature review
title_sort how is women’s demand for caesarean section measured? a systematic literature review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6402700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30840678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213352
work_keys_str_mv AT schantzclemence howiswomensdemandforcaesareansectionmeasuredasystematicliteraturereview
AT deloenzienmyriam howiswomensdemandforcaesareansectionmeasuredasystematicliteraturereview
AT goyetsophie howiswomensdemandforcaesareansectionmeasuredasystematicliteraturereview
AT ravitmarion howiswomensdemandforcaesareansectionmeasuredasystematicliteraturereview
AT dancoisneaurelien howiswomensdemandforcaesareansectionmeasuredasystematicliteraturereview
AT dumontalexandre howiswomensdemandforcaesareansectionmeasuredasystematicliteraturereview