Cargando…
Does Fractional Anisotropy Predict Motor Imagery Neurofeedback Performance in Healthy Older Adults?
Motor imagery neurofeedback training has been proposed as a potential add-on therapy for motor impairment after stroke, but not everyone benefits from it. Previous work has used white matter integrity to predict motor imagery neurofeedback aptitude in healthy young adults. We set out to test this ap...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6403184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30873015 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00069 |
_version_ | 1783400533443215360 |
---|---|
author | Meekes, Joost Debener, Stefan Zich, Catharina Bleichner, Martin G. Kranczioch, Cornelia |
author_facet | Meekes, Joost Debener, Stefan Zich, Catharina Bleichner, Martin G. Kranczioch, Cornelia |
author_sort | Meekes, Joost |
collection | PubMed |
description | Motor imagery neurofeedback training has been proposed as a potential add-on therapy for motor impairment after stroke, but not everyone benefits from it. Previous work has used white matter integrity to predict motor imagery neurofeedback aptitude in healthy young adults. We set out to test this approach with motor imagery neurofeedback that is closer to that used for stroke rehabilitation and in a sample whose age is closer to that of typical stroke patients. Using shrinkage linear discriminant analysis with fractional anisotropy values in 48 white matter regions as predictors, we predicted whether each participant in a sample of 21 healthy older adults (48–77 years old) was a good or a bad performer with 84.8% accuracy. However, the regions used for prediction in our sample differed from those identified previously, and previously suggested regions did not yield significant prediction in our sample. Including demographic and cognitive variables which may correlate with motor imagery neurofeedback performance and white matter structure as candidate predictors revealed an association with age but also led to loss of statistical significance and somewhat poorer prediction accuracy (69.6%). Our results suggest cast doubt on the feasibility of predicting the benefit of motor imagery neurofeedback from fractional anisotropy. At the very least, such predictions should be based on data collected using the same paradigm and with subjects whose characteristics match those of the target case as closely as possible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6403184 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64031842019-03-14 Does Fractional Anisotropy Predict Motor Imagery Neurofeedback Performance in Healthy Older Adults? Meekes, Joost Debener, Stefan Zich, Catharina Bleichner, Martin G. Kranczioch, Cornelia Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Motor imagery neurofeedback training has been proposed as a potential add-on therapy for motor impairment after stroke, but not everyone benefits from it. Previous work has used white matter integrity to predict motor imagery neurofeedback aptitude in healthy young adults. We set out to test this approach with motor imagery neurofeedback that is closer to that used for stroke rehabilitation and in a sample whose age is closer to that of typical stroke patients. Using shrinkage linear discriminant analysis with fractional anisotropy values in 48 white matter regions as predictors, we predicted whether each participant in a sample of 21 healthy older adults (48–77 years old) was a good or a bad performer with 84.8% accuracy. However, the regions used for prediction in our sample differed from those identified previously, and previously suggested regions did not yield significant prediction in our sample. Including demographic and cognitive variables which may correlate with motor imagery neurofeedback performance and white matter structure as candidate predictors revealed an association with age but also led to loss of statistical significance and somewhat poorer prediction accuracy (69.6%). Our results suggest cast doubt on the feasibility of predicting the benefit of motor imagery neurofeedback from fractional anisotropy. At the very least, such predictions should be based on data collected using the same paradigm and with subjects whose characteristics match those of the target case as closely as possible. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6403184/ /pubmed/30873015 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00069 Text en Copyright © 2019 Meekes, Debener, Zich, Bleichner and Kranczioch. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Meekes, Joost Debener, Stefan Zich, Catharina Bleichner, Martin G. Kranczioch, Cornelia Does Fractional Anisotropy Predict Motor Imagery Neurofeedback Performance in Healthy Older Adults? |
title | Does Fractional Anisotropy Predict Motor Imagery Neurofeedback Performance in Healthy Older Adults? |
title_full | Does Fractional Anisotropy Predict Motor Imagery Neurofeedback Performance in Healthy Older Adults? |
title_fullStr | Does Fractional Anisotropy Predict Motor Imagery Neurofeedback Performance in Healthy Older Adults? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Fractional Anisotropy Predict Motor Imagery Neurofeedback Performance in Healthy Older Adults? |
title_short | Does Fractional Anisotropy Predict Motor Imagery Neurofeedback Performance in Healthy Older Adults? |
title_sort | does fractional anisotropy predict motor imagery neurofeedback performance in healthy older adults? |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6403184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30873015 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00069 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meekesjoost doesfractionalanisotropypredictmotorimageryneurofeedbackperformanceinhealthyolderadults AT debenerstefan doesfractionalanisotropypredictmotorimageryneurofeedbackperformanceinhealthyolderadults AT zichcatharina doesfractionalanisotropypredictmotorimageryneurofeedbackperformanceinhealthyolderadults AT bleichnermarting doesfractionalanisotropypredictmotorimageryneurofeedbackperformanceinhealthyolderadults AT krancziochcornelia doesfractionalanisotropypredictmotorimageryneurofeedbackperformanceinhealthyolderadults |