Cargando…

Does Fractional Anisotropy Predict Motor Imagery Neurofeedback Performance in Healthy Older Adults?

Motor imagery neurofeedback training has been proposed as a potential add-on therapy for motor impairment after stroke, but not everyone benefits from it. Previous work has used white matter integrity to predict motor imagery neurofeedback aptitude in healthy young adults. We set out to test this ap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meekes, Joost, Debener, Stefan, Zich, Catharina, Bleichner, Martin G., Kranczioch, Cornelia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6403184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30873015
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00069
_version_ 1783400533443215360
author Meekes, Joost
Debener, Stefan
Zich, Catharina
Bleichner, Martin G.
Kranczioch, Cornelia
author_facet Meekes, Joost
Debener, Stefan
Zich, Catharina
Bleichner, Martin G.
Kranczioch, Cornelia
author_sort Meekes, Joost
collection PubMed
description Motor imagery neurofeedback training has been proposed as a potential add-on therapy for motor impairment after stroke, but not everyone benefits from it. Previous work has used white matter integrity to predict motor imagery neurofeedback aptitude in healthy young adults. We set out to test this approach with motor imagery neurofeedback that is closer to that used for stroke rehabilitation and in a sample whose age is closer to that of typical stroke patients. Using shrinkage linear discriminant analysis with fractional anisotropy values in 48 white matter regions as predictors, we predicted whether each participant in a sample of 21 healthy older adults (48–77 years old) was a good or a bad performer with 84.8% accuracy. However, the regions used for prediction in our sample differed from those identified previously, and previously suggested regions did not yield significant prediction in our sample. Including demographic and cognitive variables which may correlate with motor imagery neurofeedback performance and white matter structure as candidate predictors revealed an association with age but also led to loss of statistical significance and somewhat poorer prediction accuracy (69.6%). Our results suggest cast doubt on the feasibility of predicting the benefit of motor imagery neurofeedback from fractional anisotropy. At the very least, such predictions should be based on data collected using the same paradigm and with subjects whose characteristics match those of the target case as closely as possible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6403184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64031842019-03-14 Does Fractional Anisotropy Predict Motor Imagery Neurofeedback Performance in Healthy Older Adults? Meekes, Joost Debener, Stefan Zich, Catharina Bleichner, Martin G. Kranczioch, Cornelia Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Motor imagery neurofeedback training has been proposed as a potential add-on therapy for motor impairment after stroke, but not everyone benefits from it. Previous work has used white matter integrity to predict motor imagery neurofeedback aptitude in healthy young adults. We set out to test this approach with motor imagery neurofeedback that is closer to that used for stroke rehabilitation and in a sample whose age is closer to that of typical stroke patients. Using shrinkage linear discriminant analysis with fractional anisotropy values in 48 white matter regions as predictors, we predicted whether each participant in a sample of 21 healthy older adults (48–77 years old) was a good or a bad performer with 84.8% accuracy. However, the regions used for prediction in our sample differed from those identified previously, and previously suggested regions did not yield significant prediction in our sample. Including demographic and cognitive variables which may correlate with motor imagery neurofeedback performance and white matter structure as candidate predictors revealed an association with age but also led to loss of statistical significance and somewhat poorer prediction accuracy (69.6%). Our results suggest cast doubt on the feasibility of predicting the benefit of motor imagery neurofeedback from fractional anisotropy. At the very least, such predictions should be based on data collected using the same paradigm and with subjects whose characteristics match those of the target case as closely as possible. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6403184/ /pubmed/30873015 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00069 Text en Copyright © 2019 Meekes, Debener, Zich, Bleichner and Kranczioch. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Meekes, Joost
Debener, Stefan
Zich, Catharina
Bleichner, Martin G.
Kranczioch, Cornelia
Does Fractional Anisotropy Predict Motor Imagery Neurofeedback Performance in Healthy Older Adults?
title Does Fractional Anisotropy Predict Motor Imagery Neurofeedback Performance in Healthy Older Adults?
title_full Does Fractional Anisotropy Predict Motor Imagery Neurofeedback Performance in Healthy Older Adults?
title_fullStr Does Fractional Anisotropy Predict Motor Imagery Neurofeedback Performance in Healthy Older Adults?
title_full_unstemmed Does Fractional Anisotropy Predict Motor Imagery Neurofeedback Performance in Healthy Older Adults?
title_short Does Fractional Anisotropy Predict Motor Imagery Neurofeedback Performance in Healthy Older Adults?
title_sort does fractional anisotropy predict motor imagery neurofeedback performance in healthy older adults?
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6403184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30873015
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00069
work_keys_str_mv AT meekesjoost doesfractionalanisotropypredictmotorimageryneurofeedbackperformanceinhealthyolderadults
AT debenerstefan doesfractionalanisotropypredictmotorimageryneurofeedbackperformanceinhealthyolderadults
AT zichcatharina doesfractionalanisotropypredictmotorimageryneurofeedbackperformanceinhealthyolderadults
AT bleichnermarting doesfractionalanisotropypredictmotorimageryneurofeedbackperformanceinhealthyolderadults
AT krancziochcornelia doesfractionalanisotropypredictmotorimageryneurofeedbackperformanceinhealthyolderadults