Cargando…

Validity of an observational assessment tool for multifaceted evaluation of faecal condition

Faecal volume, form, colour, and odour are associated with various diseases, dietary habits, and the gut microbiome. Multifaceted assessment of faecal condition will be needed for future research and practice. Faecal observation has advantages, as it is non-invasive, frequent, and easy. We have deve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ohno, Harumi, Murakami, Haruka, Tanisawa, Kumpei, Konishi, Kana, Miyachi, Motohiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6403287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30842504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40178-5
_version_ 1783400562043125760
author Ohno, Harumi
Murakami, Haruka
Tanisawa, Kumpei
Konishi, Kana
Miyachi, Motohiko
author_facet Ohno, Harumi
Murakami, Haruka
Tanisawa, Kumpei
Konishi, Kana
Miyachi, Motohiko
author_sort Ohno, Harumi
collection PubMed
description Faecal volume, form, colour, and odour are associated with various diseases, dietary habits, and the gut microbiome. Multifaceted assessment of faecal condition will be needed for future research and practice. Faecal observation has advantages, as it is non-invasive, frequent, and easy. We have developed and validated an illustrative card tool for comprehensively faecal assessment. In 38 healthy adults, observations of volume, form, colour, and odour of faeces using the tool were compared to the objective characteristics of the actual faeces determined using a weighing scale, moisture meter, hardness meter, colourimeter, and odour measuring device. A significant positive correlation (ρ = 0.778) was observed between the number of faecal model (2 cm × 10 cm) units and the actual weight. The Bristol Stool Form Scale showed a significant positive correlation with the moisture content (ρ = 0.717) and negative correlations with faecal hardness (ρ = −0.843) and adhesiveness (ρ = −0.761). The L*a*b* colour space values of the stool differed significantly among observational judgments using the colour card tool. No significant correlation was observed between the observation of odour and the measured odour index. In conclusion, the faecal volume, form, and colour can be estimated by observation using the multifaceted assessment card tool.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6403287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64032872019-03-08 Validity of an observational assessment tool for multifaceted evaluation of faecal condition Ohno, Harumi Murakami, Haruka Tanisawa, Kumpei Konishi, Kana Miyachi, Motohiko Sci Rep Article Faecal volume, form, colour, and odour are associated with various diseases, dietary habits, and the gut microbiome. Multifaceted assessment of faecal condition will be needed for future research and practice. Faecal observation has advantages, as it is non-invasive, frequent, and easy. We have developed and validated an illustrative card tool for comprehensively faecal assessment. In 38 healthy adults, observations of volume, form, colour, and odour of faeces using the tool were compared to the objective characteristics of the actual faeces determined using a weighing scale, moisture meter, hardness meter, colourimeter, and odour measuring device. A significant positive correlation (ρ = 0.778) was observed between the number of faecal model (2 cm × 10 cm) units and the actual weight. The Bristol Stool Form Scale showed a significant positive correlation with the moisture content (ρ = 0.717) and negative correlations with faecal hardness (ρ = −0.843) and adhesiveness (ρ = −0.761). The L*a*b* colour space values of the stool differed significantly among observational judgments using the colour card tool. No significant correlation was observed between the observation of odour and the measured odour index. In conclusion, the faecal volume, form, and colour can be estimated by observation using the multifaceted assessment card tool. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6403287/ /pubmed/30842504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40178-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Ohno, Harumi
Murakami, Haruka
Tanisawa, Kumpei
Konishi, Kana
Miyachi, Motohiko
Validity of an observational assessment tool for multifaceted evaluation of faecal condition
title Validity of an observational assessment tool for multifaceted evaluation of faecal condition
title_full Validity of an observational assessment tool for multifaceted evaluation of faecal condition
title_fullStr Validity of an observational assessment tool for multifaceted evaluation of faecal condition
title_full_unstemmed Validity of an observational assessment tool for multifaceted evaluation of faecal condition
title_short Validity of an observational assessment tool for multifaceted evaluation of faecal condition
title_sort validity of an observational assessment tool for multifaceted evaluation of faecal condition
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6403287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30842504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40178-5
work_keys_str_mv AT ohnoharumi validityofanobservationalassessmenttoolformultifacetedevaluationoffaecalcondition
AT murakamiharuka validityofanobservationalassessmenttoolformultifacetedevaluationoffaecalcondition
AT tanisawakumpei validityofanobservationalassessmenttoolformultifacetedevaluationoffaecalcondition
AT konishikana validityofanobservationalassessmenttoolformultifacetedevaluationoffaecalcondition
AT miyachimotohiko validityofanobservationalassessmenttoolformultifacetedevaluationoffaecalcondition