Cargando…

Electrically Conductive Polyetheretherketone Nanocomposite Filaments: From Production to Fused Deposition Modeling

The present work reports the production and characterization of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) nanocomposite filaments incorporating carbon nanotubes (CNT) and graphite nanoplates (GnP), electrically conductive and suitable for fused deposition modeling (FDM) processing. The nanocomposites were manufac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gonçalves, Jordana, Lima, Patrícia, Krause, Beate, Pötschke, Petra, Lafont, Ugo, Gomes, José R., Abreu, Cristiano S., Paiva, Maria C., Covas, José A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6403709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30960850
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym10080925
_version_ 1783400681390997504
author Gonçalves, Jordana
Lima, Patrícia
Krause, Beate
Pötschke, Petra
Lafont, Ugo
Gomes, José R.
Abreu, Cristiano S.
Paiva, Maria C.
Covas, José A.
author_facet Gonçalves, Jordana
Lima, Patrícia
Krause, Beate
Pötschke, Petra
Lafont, Ugo
Gomes, José R.
Abreu, Cristiano S.
Paiva, Maria C.
Covas, José A.
author_sort Gonçalves, Jordana
collection PubMed
description The present work reports the production and characterization of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) nanocomposite filaments incorporating carbon nanotubes (CNT) and graphite nanoplates (GnP), electrically conductive and suitable for fused deposition modeling (FDM) processing. The nanocomposites were manufactured by melt mixing and those presenting electrical conductivity near 10 S/m were selected for the production of filaments for FDM. The extruded filaments were characterized for mechanical and thermal conductivity, polymer crystallinity, thermal relaxation, nanoparticle dispersion, thermoelectric effect, and coefficient of friction. They presented electrical conductivity in the range of 1.5 to 13.1 S/m, as well as good mechanical performance and higher thermal conductivity compared to PEEK. The addition of GnP improved the composites’ melt processability, maintained the electrical conductivity at target level, and reduced the coefficient of friction by up to 60%. Finally, three-dimensional (3D) printed test specimens were produced, showing a Young’s modulus and ultimate tensile strength comparable to those of the filaments, but a lower strain at break and electrical conductivity. This was attributed to the presence of large voids in the part, revealing the need for 3D printing parameter optimization. Finally, filament production was up-scaled to kilogram scale maintaining the properties of the research-scale filaments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6403709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64037092019-04-02 Electrically Conductive Polyetheretherketone Nanocomposite Filaments: From Production to Fused Deposition Modeling Gonçalves, Jordana Lima, Patrícia Krause, Beate Pötschke, Petra Lafont, Ugo Gomes, José R. Abreu, Cristiano S. Paiva, Maria C. Covas, José A. Polymers (Basel) Article The present work reports the production and characterization of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) nanocomposite filaments incorporating carbon nanotubes (CNT) and graphite nanoplates (GnP), electrically conductive and suitable for fused deposition modeling (FDM) processing. The nanocomposites were manufactured by melt mixing and those presenting electrical conductivity near 10 S/m were selected for the production of filaments for FDM. The extruded filaments were characterized for mechanical and thermal conductivity, polymer crystallinity, thermal relaxation, nanoparticle dispersion, thermoelectric effect, and coefficient of friction. They presented electrical conductivity in the range of 1.5 to 13.1 S/m, as well as good mechanical performance and higher thermal conductivity compared to PEEK. The addition of GnP improved the composites’ melt processability, maintained the electrical conductivity at target level, and reduced the coefficient of friction by up to 60%. Finally, three-dimensional (3D) printed test specimens were produced, showing a Young’s modulus and ultimate tensile strength comparable to those of the filaments, but a lower strain at break and electrical conductivity. This was attributed to the presence of large voids in the part, revealing the need for 3D printing parameter optimization. Finally, filament production was up-scaled to kilogram scale maintaining the properties of the research-scale filaments. MDPI 2018-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6403709/ /pubmed/30960850 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym10080925 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gonçalves, Jordana
Lima, Patrícia
Krause, Beate
Pötschke, Petra
Lafont, Ugo
Gomes, José R.
Abreu, Cristiano S.
Paiva, Maria C.
Covas, José A.
Electrically Conductive Polyetheretherketone Nanocomposite Filaments: From Production to Fused Deposition Modeling
title Electrically Conductive Polyetheretherketone Nanocomposite Filaments: From Production to Fused Deposition Modeling
title_full Electrically Conductive Polyetheretherketone Nanocomposite Filaments: From Production to Fused Deposition Modeling
title_fullStr Electrically Conductive Polyetheretherketone Nanocomposite Filaments: From Production to Fused Deposition Modeling
title_full_unstemmed Electrically Conductive Polyetheretherketone Nanocomposite Filaments: From Production to Fused Deposition Modeling
title_short Electrically Conductive Polyetheretherketone Nanocomposite Filaments: From Production to Fused Deposition Modeling
title_sort electrically conductive polyetheretherketone nanocomposite filaments: from production to fused deposition modeling
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6403709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30960850
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym10080925
work_keys_str_mv AT goncalvesjordana electricallyconductivepolyetheretherketonenanocompositefilamentsfromproductiontofuseddepositionmodeling
AT limapatricia electricallyconductivepolyetheretherketonenanocompositefilamentsfromproductiontofuseddepositionmodeling
AT krausebeate electricallyconductivepolyetheretherketonenanocompositefilamentsfromproductiontofuseddepositionmodeling
AT potschkepetra electricallyconductivepolyetheretherketonenanocompositefilamentsfromproductiontofuseddepositionmodeling
AT lafontugo electricallyconductivepolyetheretherketonenanocompositefilamentsfromproductiontofuseddepositionmodeling
AT gomesjoser electricallyconductivepolyetheretherketonenanocompositefilamentsfromproductiontofuseddepositionmodeling
AT abreucristianos electricallyconductivepolyetheretherketonenanocompositefilamentsfromproductiontofuseddepositionmodeling
AT paivamariac electricallyconductivepolyetheretherketonenanocompositefilamentsfromproductiontofuseddepositionmodeling
AT covasjosea electricallyconductivepolyetheretherketonenanocompositefilamentsfromproductiontofuseddepositionmodeling