Cargando…

Costs and outcomes of Lynch syndrome screening in the Australian colorectal cancer population

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Individuals with Lynch syndrome (LS) are at increased risk of LS‐related cancers including colorectal cancer (CRC). CRC tumor screening for mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency is recommended in Australia to identify LS, although its cost‐effectiveness has not been assessed. We aim t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cenin, Dayna R, Naber, Steffie K, Lansdorp‐Vogelaar, Iris, Jenkins, Mark A, Buchanan, Daniel D, Preen, David B, Ee, Hooi C, O'Leary, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6403824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29645364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgh.14154
_version_ 1783400713314893824
author Cenin, Dayna R
Naber, Steffie K
Lansdorp‐Vogelaar, Iris
Jenkins, Mark A
Buchanan, Daniel D
Preen, David B
Ee, Hooi C
O'Leary, Peter
author_facet Cenin, Dayna R
Naber, Steffie K
Lansdorp‐Vogelaar, Iris
Jenkins, Mark A
Buchanan, Daniel D
Preen, David B
Ee, Hooi C
O'Leary, Peter
author_sort Cenin, Dayna R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: Individuals with Lynch syndrome (LS) are at increased risk of LS‐related cancers including colorectal cancer (CRC). CRC tumor screening for mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency is recommended in Australia to identify LS, although its cost‐effectiveness has not been assessed. We aim to determine the cost‐effectiveness of screening individuals with CRC for LS at different age‐at‐diagnosis thresholds. METHODS: We developed a decision analysis model to estimate yield and costs of LS screening. Age‐specific probabilities of LS diagnosis were based on Australian data. Two CRC tumor screening pathways were assessed (MMR immunohistochemistry followed by MLH1 methylation (MLH1‐Pathway) or BRAF V600E testing (BRAF‐Pathway) if MLH1 expression was lost) for four age‐at‐diagnosis thresholds—screening < 50, screening < 60, screening < 70, and universal screening. RESULTS: Per 1000 CRC cases, screening < 50 identified 5.2 LS cases and cost $A7041 per case detected in the MLH1‐Pathway. Screening < 60 increased detection by 1.5 cases for an incremental cost of $A25 177 per additional case detected. Screening < 70 detected 1.6 additional cases at an incremental cost of $A40 278 per additional case detected. Compared with screening < 70, universal screening detected no additional LS cases but cost $A158 724 extra. The BRAF‐Pathway identified the same number of LS cases for higher costs. CONCLUSIONS: The MLH1‐Pathway is more cost‐effective than BRAF‐Pathway for all age‐at‐diagnosis thresholds. MMR immunohistochemistry tumor screening in individuals diagnosed with CRC aged < 70 years resulted in higher LS case detection at a reasonable cost. Further research into the yield of LS screening in CRC patients ≥ 70 years is needed to determine if universal screening is justified.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6403824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64038242019-03-19 Costs and outcomes of Lynch syndrome screening in the Australian colorectal cancer population Cenin, Dayna R Naber, Steffie K Lansdorp‐Vogelaar, Iris Jenkins, Mark A Buchanan, Daniel D Preen, David B Ee, Hooi C O'Leary, Peter J Gastroenterol Hepatol Clinical Gastroenterology BACKGROUND AND AIM: Individuals with Lynch syndrome (LS) are at increased risk of LS‐related cancers including colorectal cancer (CRC). CRC tumor screening for mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency is recommended in Australia to identify LS, although its cost‐effectiveness has not been assessed. We aim to determine the cost‐effectiveness of screening individuals with CRC for LS at different age‐at‐diagnosis thresholds. METHODS: We developed a decision analysis model to estimate yield and costs of LS screening. Age‐specific probabilities of LS diagnosis were based on Australian data. Two CRC tumor screening pathways were assessed (MMR immunohistochemistry followed by MLH1 methylation (MLH1‐Pathway) or BRAF V600E testing (BRAF‐Pathway) if MLH1 expression was lost) for four age‐at‐diagnosis thresholds—screening < 50, screening < 60, screening < 70, and universal screening. RESULTS: Per 1000 CRC cases, screening < 50 identified 5.2 LS cases and cost $A7041 per case detected in the MLH1‐Pathway. Screening < 60 increased detection by 1.5 cases for an incremental cost of $A25 177 per additional case detected. Screening < 70 detected 1.6 additional cases at an incremental cost of $A40 278 per additional case detected. Compared with screening < 70, universal screening detected no additional LS cases but cost $A158 724 extra. The BRAF‐Pathway identified the same number of LS cases for higher costs. CONCLUSIONS: The MLH1‐Pathway is more cost‐effective than BRAF‐Pathway for all age‐at‐diagnosis thresholds. MMR immunohistochemistry tumor screening in individuals diagnosed with CRC aged < 70 years resulted in higher LS case detection at a reasonable cost. Further research into the yield of LS screening in CRC patients ≥ 70 years is needed to determine if universal screening is justified. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-05-17 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6403824/ /pubmed/29645364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgh.14154 Text en © 2018 The Authors Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Clinical Gastroenterology
Cenin, Dayna R
Naber, Steffie K
Lansdorp‐Vogelaar, Iris
Jenkins, Mark A
Buchanan, Daniel D
Preen, David B
Ee, Hooi C
O'Leary, Peter
Costs and outcomes of Lynch syndrome screening in the Australian colorectal cancer population
title Costs and outcomes of Lynch syndrome screening in the Australian colorectal cancer population
title_full Costs and outcomes of Lynch syndrome screening in the Australian colorectal cancer population
title_fullStr Costs and outcomes of Lynch syndrome screening in the Australian colorectal cancer population
title_full_unstemmed Costs and outcomes of Lynch syndrome screening in the Australian colorectal cancer population
title_short Costs and outcomes of Lynch syndrome screening in the Australian colorectal cancer population
title_sort costs and outcomes of lynch syndrome screening in the australian colorectal cancer population
topic Clinical Gastroenterology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6403824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29645364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgh.14154
work_keys_str_mv AT cenindaynar costsandoutcomesoflynchsyndromescreeningintheaustraliancolorectalcancerpopulation
AT nabersteffiek costsandoutcomesoflynchsyndromescreeningintheaustraliancolorectalcancerpopulation
AT lansdorpvogelaariris costsandoutcomesoflynchsyndromescreeningintheaustraliancolorectalcancerpopulation
AT jenkinsmarka costsandoutcomesoflynchsyndromescreeningintheaustraliancolorectalcancerpopulation
AT buchanandanield costsandoutcomesoflynchsyndromescreeningintheaustraliancolorectalcancerpopulation
AT preendavidb costsandoutcomesoflynchsyndromescreeningintheaustraliancolorectalcancerpopulation
AT eehooic costsandoutcomesoflynchsyndromescreeningintheaustraliancolorectalcancerpopulation
AT olearypeter costsandoutcomesoflynchsyndromescreeningintheaustraliancolorectalcancerpopulation