Cargando…

High‐Intensity Interval Training for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease—Is It Safe? A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for patients with cardiovascular disease has traditionally involved low‐ to moderate‐intensity continuous aerobic exercise training (MICT). There is growing and robust evidence that high‐intensity interval training (HIIT) shows similar or greater efficacy comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wewege, Michael A., Ahn, Dohee, Yu, Jennifer, Liou, Kevin, Keech, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30376749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009305
_version_ 1783400820178419712
author Wewege, Michael A.
Ahn, Dohee
Yu, Jennifer
Liou, Kevin
Keech, Andrew
author_facet Wewege, Michael A.
Ahn, Dohee
Yu, Jennifer
Liou, Kevin
Keech, Andrew
author_sort Wewege, Michael A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for patients with cardiovascular disease has traditionally involved low‐ to moderate‐intensity continuous aerobic exercise training (MICT). There is growing and robust evidence that high‐intensity interval training (HIIT) shows similar or greater efficacy compared with MICT across a range of cardiovascular and metabolic measures, in both healthy populations and populations with a chronic illness. However, there is understandable concern about the safety aspects of applying HIIT in CR settings. This systematic review analyzed safety data drawn from recent proof‐of‐concept studies of HIIT during CR among patients with cardiovascular disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included trials comparing HIIT with either MICT or usual care in patients with coronary artery disease or heart failure participating in tertiary care services, such as phase 2 (outpatient) CR. Adverse events occurring during or up to 4 hours after an exercise training session were collated. There were 23 studies included, which analyzed 1117 participants (HIIT=547; MICT=570). One major cardiovascular adverse event occurred in relation to an HIIT session, equating to 1 major cardiovascular event per 17 083 training sessions (11 333 training hours). One minor cardiovascular adverse events and 3 noncardiovascular adverse events (primarily musculoskeletal complaints) were also reported for HIIT. Two noncardiovascular events were reported in relation to MICT. CONCLUSIONS: HIIT has shown a relatively low rate of major adverse cardiovascular events for patients with coronary artery disease or heart failure when applied within CR settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6404189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64041892019-03-18 High‐Intensity Interval Training for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease—Is It Safe? A Systematic Review Wewege, Michael A. Ahn, Dohee Yu, Jennifer Liou, Kevin Keech, Andrew J Am Heart Assoc Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for patients with cardiovascular disease has traditionally involved low‐ to moderate‐intensity continuous aerobic exercise training (MICT). There is growing and robust evidence that high‐intensity interval training (HIIT) shows similar or greater efficacy compared with MICT across a range of cardiovascular and metabolic measures, in both healthy populations and populations with a chronic illness. However, there is understandable concern about the safety aspects of applying HIIT in CR settings. This systematic review analyzed safety data drawn from recent proof‐of‐concept studies of HIIT during CR among patients with cardiovascular disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included trials comparing HIIT with either MICT or usual care in patients with coronary artery disease or heart failure participating in tertiary care services, such as phase 2 (outpatient) CR. Adverse events occurring during or up to 4 hours after an exercise training session were collated. There were 23 studies included, which analyzed 1117 participants (HIIT=547; MICT=570). One major cardiovascular adverse event occurred in relation to an HIIT session, equating to 1 major cardiovascular event per 17 083 training sessions (11 333 training hours). One minor cardiovascular adverse events and 3 noncardiovascular adverse events (primarily musculoskeletal complaints) were also reported for HIIT. Two noncardiovascular events were reported in relation to MICT. CONCLUSIONS: HIIT has shown a relatively low rate of major adverse cardiovascular events for patients with coronary artery disease or heart failure when applied within CR settings. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6404189/ /pubmed/30376749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009305 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
Wewege, Michael A.
Ahn, Dohee
Yu, Jennifer
Liou, Kevin
Keech, Andrew
High‐Intensity Interval Training for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease—Is It Safe? A Systematic Review
title High‐Intensity Interval Training for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease—Is It Safe? A Systematic Review
title_full High‐Intensity Interval Training for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease—Is It Safe? A Systematic Review
title_fullStr High‐Intensity Interval Training for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease—Is It Safe? A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed High‐Intensity Interval Training for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease—Is It Safe? A Systematic Review
title_short High‐Intensity Interval Training for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease—Is It Safe? A Systematic Review
title_sort high‐intensity interval training for patients with cardiovascular disease—is it safe? a systematic review
topic Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30376749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009305
work_keys_str_mv AT wewegemichaela highintensityintervaltrainingforpatientswithcardiovasculardiseaseisitsafeasystematicreview
AT ahndohee highintensityintervaltrainingforpatientswithcardiovasculardiseaseisitsafeasystematicreview
AT yujennifer highintensityintervaltrainingforpatientswithcardiovasculardiseaseisitsafeasystematicreview
AT lioukevin highintensityintervaltrainingforpatientswithcardiovasculardiseaseisitsafeasystematicreview
AT keechandrew highintensityintervaltrainingforpatientswithcardiovasculardiseaseisitsafeasystematicreview