Cargando…
High‐Intensity Interval Training for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease—Is It Safe? A Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for patients with cardiovascular disease has traditionally involved low‐ to moderate‐intensity continuous aerobic exercise training (MICT). There is growing and robust evidence that high‐intensity interval training (HIIT) shows similar or greater efficacy comp...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30376749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009305 |
_version_ | 1783400820178419712 |
---|---|
author | Wewege, Michael A. Ahn, Dohee Yu, Jennifer Liou, Kevin Keech, Andrew |
author_facet | Wewege, Michael A. Ahn, Dohee Yu, Jennifer Liou, Kevin Keech, Andrew |
author_sort | Wewege, Michael A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for patients with cardiovascular disease has traditionally involved low‐ to moderate‐intensity continuous aerobic exercise training (MICT). There is growing and robust evidence that high‐intensity interval training (HIIT) shows similar or greater efficacy compared with MICT across a range of cardiovascular and metabolic measures, in both healthy populations and populations with a chronic illness. However, there is understandable concern about the safety aspects of applying HIIT in CR settings. This systematic review analyzed safety data drawn from recent proof‐of‐concept studies of HIIT during CR among patients with cardiovascular disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included trials comparing HIIT with either MICT or usual care in patients with coronary artery disease or heart failure participating in tertiary care services, such as phase 2 (outpatient) CR. Adverse events occurring during or up to 4 hours after an exercise training session were collated. There were 23 studies included, which analyzed 1117 participants (HIIT=547; MICT=570). One major cardiovascular adverse event occurred in relation to an HIIT session, equating to 1 major cardiovascular event per 17 083 training sessions (11 333 training hours). One minor cardiovascular adverse events and 3 noncardiovascular adverse events (primarily musculoskeletal complaints) were also reported for HIIT. Two noncardiovascular events were reported in relation to MICT. CONCLUSIONS: HIIT has shown a relatively low rate of major adverse cardiovascular events for patients with coronary artery disease or heart failure when applied within CR settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6404189 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64041892019-03-18 High‐Intensity Interval Training for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease—Is It Safe? A Systematic Review Wewege, Michael A. Ahn, Dohee Yu, Jennifer Liou, Kevin Keech, Andrew J Am Heart Assoc Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for patients with cardiovascular disease has traditionally involved low‐ to moderate‐intensity continuous aerobic exercise training (MICT). There is growing and robust evidence that high‐intensity interval training (HIIT) shows similar or greater efficacy compared with MICT across a range of cardiovascular and metabolic measures, in both healthy populations and populations with a chronic illness. However, there is understandable concern about the safety aspects of applying HIIT in CR settings. This systematic review analyzed safety data drawn from recent proof‐of‐concept studies of HIIT during CR among patients with cardiovascular disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included trials comparing HIIT with either MICT or usual care in patients with coronary artery disease or heart failure participating in tertiary care services, such as phase 2 (outpatient) CR. Adverse events occurring during or up to 4 hours after an exercise training session were collated. There were 23 studies included, which analyzed 1117 participants (HIIT=547; MICT=570). One major cardiovascular adverse event occurred in relation to an HIIT session, equating to 1 major cardiovascular event per 17 083 training sessions (11 333 training hours). One minor cardiovascular adverse events and 3 noncardiovascular adverse events (primarily musculoskeletal complaints) were also reported for HIIT. Two noncardiovascular events were reported in relation to MICT. CONCLUSIONS: HIIT has shown a relatively low rate of major adverse cardiovascular events for patients with coronary artery disease or heart failure when applied within CR settings. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6404189/ /pubmed/30376749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009305 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis Wewege, Michael A. Ahn, Dohee Yu, Jennifer Liou, Kevin Keech, Andrew High‐Intensity Interval Training for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease—Is It Safe? A Systematic Review |
title | High‐Intensity Interval Training for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease—Is It Safe? A Systematic Review |
title_full | High‐Intensity Interval Training for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease—Is It Safe? A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | High‐Intensity Interval Training for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease—Is It Safe? A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | High‐Intensity Interval Training for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease—Is It Safe? A Systematic Review |
title_short | High‐Intensity Interval Training for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease—Is It Safe? A Systematic Review |
title_sort | high‐intensity interval training for patients with cardiovascular disease—is it safe? a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30376749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009305 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wewegemichaela highintensityintervaltrainingforpatientswithcardiovasculardiseaseisitsafeasystematicreview AT ahndohee highintensityintervaltrainingforpatientswithcardiovasculardiseaseisitsafeasystematicreview AT yujennifer highintensityintervaltrainingforpatientswithcardiovasculardiseaseisitsafeasystematicreview AT lioukevin highintensityintervaltrainingforpatientswithcardiovasculardiseaseisitsafeasystematicreview AT keechandrew highintensityintervaltrainingforpatientswithcardiovasculardiseaseisitsafeasystematicreview |