Cargando…

Facility type and surgical specialty are associated with suboptimal surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis practice patterns: a multi-center, retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend discontinuation of antimicrobial prophylaxis within 24 h after incision closure in uninfected patients. However, how facility and surgical specialty factors affect the implementation of these evidence-based surgical prophylaxis guidelines in outpatient surgery is unk...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Branch-Elliman, Westyn, Pizer, Steven D., Dasinger, Elise A., Gold, Howard S., Abdulkerim, Hassen, Rosen, Amy K., Charns, Martin P., Hawn, Mary T., Itani, Kamal M. F., Mull, Hillary J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30886702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0503-9
_version_ 1783400839002456064
author Branch-Elliman, Westyn
Pizer, Steven D.
Dasinger, Elise A.
Gold, Howard S.
Abdulkerim, Hassen
Rosen, Amy K.
Charns, Martin P.
Hawn, Mary T.
Itani, Kamal M. F.
Mull, Hillary J.
author_facet Branch-Elliman, Westyn
Pizer, Steven D.
Dasinger, Elise A.
Gold, Howard S.
Abdulkerim, Hassen
Rosen, Amy K.
Charns, Martin P.
Hawn, Mary T.
Itani, Kamal M. F.
Mull, Hillary J.
author_sort Branch-Elliman, Westyn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend discontinuation of antimicrobial prophylaxis within 24 h after incision closure in uninfected patients. However, how facility and surgical specialty factors affect the implementation of these evidence-based surgical prophylaxis guidelines in outpatient surgery is unknown. Thus, we sought to measure how facility complexity, including ambulatory surgical center (ASC) status and availability of ancillary services, impact adherence to guidelines for timely discontinuation of antimicrobial prophylaxis after outpatient surgery. A secondary aim was to measure the association between surgical specialty and guideline compliance. METHODS: A multi-center, national Veterans Health Administration retrospective cohort from 10/1/2015–9/30/2017 including any Veteran undergoing an outpatient surgical procedure in any of five specialties (general surgery, urology, ophthalmology, ENT, orthopedics) was created. The primary outcome was the association between facility complexity and proportion of surgeries not compliant with discontinuation of antimicrobials within 24 h of incision closure. Data were analyzed using logistic regression with adjustments for patient and procedural factors. RESULTS: Among 153,097 outpatient surgeries, 7712 (5.0%) received antimicrobial prophylaxis lasting > 24 h after surgery; rates ranged from 0.4% (eye surgeries) to 13.7% (genitourinary surgeries). Cystoscopies and cystoureteroscopy with lithotripsy procedures had the highest rates (16 and 20%), while hernia repair, cataract surgeries, and laparoscopic cholecystectomies had the lowest (0.2–0.3%). In an adjusted logistic regression model, lower complexity ASC and hospital outpatient departments had higher odds of prolonged antimicrobial prophylaxis compared to complex hospitals (OR ASC, 1.3, 95% CI: 1.2–1.5). Patient factors associated with higher odds of noncompliance with antimicrobial discontinuation included younger age, female sex, and white race. Genitourinary and ear/nose/throat surgeries were associated with the highest odds of prolonged antimicrobial prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Facility complexity appears to play a role in adherence to surgical infection prevention guidelines. Lower complexity facilities with limited infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship resources may be important targets for quality improvement. Such interventions may be especially useful for genitourinary and ear/nose/throat surgical subspecialties. Increasing pharmacy, antimicrobial stewardship and/or infection prevention resources to promote more evidence-based care may support surgical providers in lower complexity ambulatory surgery centers and hospital outpatient departments in their efforts to improve this facet of patient safety. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13756-019-0503-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6404270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64042702019-03-18 Facility type and surgical specialty are associated with suboptimal surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis practice patterns: a multi-center, retrospective cohort study Branch-Elliman, Westyn Pizer, Steven D. Dasinger, Elise A. Gold, Howard S. Abdulkerim, Hassen Rosen, Amy K. Charns, Martin P. Hawn, Mary T. Itani, Kamal M. F. Mull, Hillary J. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend discontinuation of antimicrobial prophylaxis within 24 h after incision closure in uninfected patients. However, how facility and surgical specialty factors affect the implementation of these evidence-based surgical prophylaxis guidelines in outpatient surgery is unknown. Thus, we sought to measure how facility complexity, including ambulatory surgical center (ASC) status and availability of ancillary services, impact adherence to guidelines for timely discontinuation of antimicrobial prophylaxis after outpatient surgery. A secondary aim was to measure the association between surgical specialty and guideline compliance. METHODS: A multi-center, national Veterans Health Administration retrospective cohort from 10/1/2015–9/30/2017 including any Veteran undergoing an outpatient surgical procedure in any of five specialties (general surgery, urology, ophthalmology, ENT, orthopedics) was created. The primary outcome was the association between facility complexity and proportion of surgeries not compliant with discontinuation of antimicrobials within 24 h of incision closure. Data were analyzed using logistic regression with adjustments for patient and procedural factors. RESULTS: Among 153,097 outpatient surgeries, 7712 (5.0%) received antimicrobial prophylaxis lasting > 24 h after surgery; rates ranged from 0.4% (eye surgeries) to 13.7% (genitourinary surgeries). Cystoscopies and cystoureteroscopy with lithotripsy procedures had the highest rates (16 and 20%), while hernia repair, cataract surgeries, and laparoscopic cholecystectomies had the lowest (0.2–0.3%). In an adjusted logistic regression model, lower complexity ASC and hospital outpatient departments had higher odds of prolonged antimicrobial prophylaxis compared to complex hospitals (OR ASC, 1.3, 95% CI: 1.2–1.5). Patient factors associated with higher odds of noncompliance with antimicrobial discontinuation included younger age, female sex, and white race. Genitourinary and ear/nose/throat surgeries were associated with the highest odds of prolonged antimicrobial prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Facility complexity appears to play a role in adherence to surgical infection prevention guidelines. Lower complexity facilities with limited infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship resources may be important targets for quality improvement. Such interventions may be especially useful for genitourinary and ear/nose/throat surgical subspecialties. Increasing pharmacy, antimicrobial stewardship and/or infection prevention resources to promote more evidence-based care may support surgical providers in lower complexity ambulatory surgery centers and hospital outpatient departments in their efforts to improve this facet of patient safety. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13756-019-0503-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6404270/ /pubmed/30886702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0503-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Branch-Elliman, Westyn
Pizer, Steven D.
Dasinger, Elise A.
Gold, Howard S.
Abdulkerim, Hassen
Rosen, Amy K.
Charns, Martin P.
Hawn, Mary T.
Itani, Kamal M. F.
Mull, Hillary J.
Facility type and surgical specialty are associated with suboptimal surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis practice patterns: a multi-center, retrospective cohort study
title Facility type and surgical specialty are associated with suboptimal surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis practice patterns: a multi-center, retrospective cohort study
title_full Facility type and surgical specialty are associated with suboptimal surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis practice patterns: a multi-center, retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Facility type and surgical specialty are associated with suboptimal surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis practice patterns: a multi-center, retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Facility type and surgical specialty are associated with suboptimal surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis practice patterns: a multi-center, retrospective cohort study
title_short Facility type and surgical specialty are associated with suboptimal surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis practice patterns: a multi-center, retrospective cohort study
title_sort facility type and surgical specialty are associated with suboptimal surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis practice patterns: a multi-center, retrospective cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30886702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0503-9
work_keys_str_mv AT branchellimanwestyn facilitytypeandsurgicalspecialtyareassociatedwithsuboptimalsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxispracticepatternsamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT pizerstevend facilitytypeandsurgicalspecialtyareassociatedwithsuboptimalsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxispracticepatternsamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT dasingerelisea facilitytypeandsurgicalspecialtyareassociatedwithsuboptimalsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxispracticepatternsamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT goldhowards facilitytypeandsurgicalspecialtyareassociatedwithsuboptimalsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxispracticepatternsamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT abdulkerimhassen facilitytypeandsurgicalspecialtyareassociatedwithsuboptimalsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxispracticepatternsamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT rosenamyk facilitytypeandsurgicalspecialtyareassociatedwithsuboptimalsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxispracticepatternsamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT charnsmartinp facilitytypeandsurgicalspecialtyareassociatedwithsuboptimalsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxispracticepatternsamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT hawnmaryt facilitytypeandsurgicalspecialtyareassociatedwithsuboptimalsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxispracticepatternsamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT itanikamalmf facilitytypeandsurgicalspecialtyareassociatedwithsuboptimalsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxispracticepatternsamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT mullhillaryj facilitytypeandsurgicalspecialtyareassociatedwithsuboptimalsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxispracticepatternsamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy