Cargando…
Comparison of Tigecycline or Cefoperazone/Sulbactam therapy for bloodstream infection due to Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
BACKGROUND: We retrospectively analyzed the effect of tigecycline and cefoperazone/sulbactam therapies on the prognosis of patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection (CRAB-BSI). METHODS: CRAB-BSI patients receiving tigecycline therapy or cefoperazone/sulbactam t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30886705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0502-x |
_version_ | 1783400860134408192 |
---|---|
author | Niu, Tianshui Luo, Qixia Li, Yaqing Zhou, Yanzi Yu, Wei Xiao, Yonghong |
author_facet | Niu, Tianshui Luo, Qixia Li, Yaqing Zhou, Yanzi Yu, Wei Xiao, Yonghong |
author_sort | Niu, Tianshui |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We retrospectively analyzed the effect of tigecycline and cefoperazone/sulbactam therapies on the prognosis of patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection (CRAB-BSI). METHODS: CRAB-BSI patients receiving tigecycline therapy or cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy between January 2012 and December 2017 was enrolled, and strict exclusion criteria were followed. The 28-day mortality of patients was analyzed. The impact of cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy on prognosis was evaluated using Cox multivariate regression analysis. The 28-day mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam monotherapy and cefoperazone/sulbactam-based combination therapy was also compared. RESULTS: Three hundred forty eight patients with CRAB-BSI were enrolled in the study. Two hundred ten patients were included after applying the exclusion criteria. Of these, 135 patients received tigecycline therapy and 75 patients received cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy. The 28-day mortality of patients in the latter group was, significantly lower than that of the tigecycline group [29.3% vs. 51.9%; P = 0.001]. Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy exerted a protective effect on the prognosis of patients [hazard ratio 0.566, 95% confidence interval (0.342–0.940); P = 0.028]. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis indicated that the 28-day mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy was lower than that of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam monotherapy, but the difference was not significant (22.2% vs. 40%; P = 0.074). However, the mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam with imipenem/cilastatin was significantly lower than that of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam monotherapy (P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy had a better clinical outcome. The mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam with imipenem/cilastatin seems to be the lowest. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13756-019-0502-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6404342 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64043422019-03-18 Comparison of Tigecycline or Cefoperazone/Sulbactam therapy for bloodstream infection due to Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Niu, Tianshui Luo, Qixia Li, Yaqing Zhou, Yanzi Yu, Wei Xiao, Yonghong Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: We retrospectively analyzed the effect of tigecycline and cefoperazone/sulbactam therapies on the prognosis of patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection (CRAB-BSI). METHODS: CRAB-BSI patients receiving tigecycline therapy or cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy between January 2012 and December 2017 was enrolled, and strict exclusion criteria were followed. The 28-day mortality of patients was analyzed. The impact of cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy on prognosis was evaluated using Cox multivariate regression analysis. The 28-day mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam monotherapy and cefoperazone/sulbactam-based combination therapy was also compared. RESULTS: Three hundred forty eight patients with CRAB-BSI were enrolled in the study. Two hundred ten patients were included after applying the exclusion criteria. Of these, 135 patients received tigecycline therapy and 75 patients received cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy. The 28-day mortality of patients in the latter group was, significantly lower than that of the tigecycline group [29.3% vs. 51.9%; P = 0.001]. Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy exerted a protective effect on the prognosis of patients [hazard ratio 0.566, 95% confidence interval (0.342–0.940); P = 0.028]. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis indicated that the 28-day mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy was lower than that of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam monotherapy, but the difference was not significant (22.2% vs. 40%; P = 0.074). However, the mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam with imipenem/cilastatin was significantly lower than that of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam monotherapy (P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy had a better clinical outcome. The mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam with imipenem/cilastatin seems to be the lowest. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13756-019-0502-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6404342/ /pubmed/30886705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0502-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Niu, Tianshui Luo, Qixia Li, Yaqing Zhou, Yanzi Yu, Wei Xiao, Yonghong Comparison of Tigecycline or Cefoperazone/Sulbactam therapy for bloodstream infection due to Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii |
title | Comparison of Tigecycline or Cefoperazone/Sulbactam therapy for bloodstream infection due to Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii |
title_full | Comparison of Tigecycline or Cefoperazone/Sulbactam therapy for bloodstream infection due to Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Tigecycline or Cefoperazone/Sulbactam therapy for bloodstream infection due to Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Tigecycline or Cefoperazone/Sulbactam therapy for bloodstream infection due to Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii |
title_short | Comparison of Tigecycline or Cefoperazone/Sulbactam therapy for bloodstream infection due to Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii |
title_sort | comparison of tigecycline or cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy for bloodstream infection due to carbapenem-resistant acinetobacter baumannii |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30886705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0502-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT niutianshui comparisonoftigecyclineorcefoperazonesulbactamtherapyforbloodstreaminfectionduetocarbapenemresistantacinetobacterbaumannii AT luoqixia comparisonoftigecyclineorcefoperazonesulbactamtherapyforbloodstreaminfectionduetocarbapenemresistantacinetobacterbaumannii AT liyaqing comparisonoftigecyclineorcefoperazonesulbactamtherapyforbloodstreaminfectionduetocarbapenemresistantacinetobacterbaumannii AT zhouyanzi comparisonoftigecyclineorcefoperazonesulbactamtherapyforbloodstreaminfectionduetocarbapenemresistantacinetobacterbaumannii AT yuwei comparisonoftigecyclineorcefoperazonesulbactamtherapyforbloodstreaminfectionduetocarbapenemresistantacinetobacterbaumannii AT xiaoyonghong comparisonoftigecyclineorcefoperazonesulbactamtherapyforbloodstreaminfectionduetocarbapenemresistantacinetobacterbaumannii |