Cargando…

Comparison of Tigecycline or Cefoperazone/Sulbactam therapy for bloodstream infection due to Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

BACKGROUND: We retrospectively analyzed the effect of tigecycline and cefoperazone/sulbactam therapies on the prognosis of patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection (CRAB-BSI). METHODS: CRAB-BSI patients receiving tigecycline therapy or cefoperazone/sulbactam t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niu, Tianshui, Luo, Qixia, Li, Yaqing, Zhou, Yanzi, Yu, Wei, Xiao, Yonghong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30886705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0502-x
_version_ 1783400860134408192
author Niu, Tianshui
Luo, Qixia
Li, Yaqing
Zhou, Yanzi
Yu, Wei
Xiao, Yonghong
author_facet Niu, Tianshui
Luo, Qixia
Li, Yaqing
Zhou, Yanzi
Yu, Wei
Xiao, Yonghong
author_sort Niu, Tianshui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We retrospectively analyzed the effect of tigecycline and cefoperazone/sulbactam therapies on the prognosis of patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection (CRAB-BSI). METHODS: CRAB-BSI patients receiving tigecycline therapy or cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy between January 2012 and December 2017 was enrolled, and strict exclusion criteria were followed. The 28-day mortality of patients was analyzed. The impact of cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy on prognosis was evaluated using Cox multivariate regression analysis. The 28-day mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam monotherapy and cefoperazone/sulbactam-based combination therapy was also compared. RESULTS: Three hundred forty eight patients with CRAB-BSI were enrolled in the study. Two hundred ten patients were included after applying the exclusion criteria. Of these, 135 patients received tigecycline therapy and 75 patients received cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy. The 28-day mortality of patients in the latter group was, significantly lower than that of the tigecycline group [29.3% vs. 51.9%; P = 0.001]. Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy exerted a protective effect on the prognosis of patients [hazard ratio 0.566, 95% confidence interval (0.342–0.940); P = 0.028]. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis indicated that the 28-day mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy was lower than that of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam monotherapy, but the difference was not significant (22.2% vs. 40%; P = 0.074). However, the mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam with imipenem/cilastatin was significantly lower than that of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam monotherapy (P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy had a better clinical outcome. The mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam with imipenem/cilastatin seems to be the lowest. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13756-019-0502-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6404342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64043422019-03-18 Comparison of Tigecycline or Cefoperazone/Sulbactam therapy for bloodstream infection due to Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Niu, Tianshui Luo, Qixia Li, Yaqing Zhou, Yanzi Yu, Wei Xiao, Yonghong Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: We retrospectively analyzed the effect of tigecycline and cefoperazone/sulbactam therapies on the prognosis of patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection (CRAB-BSI). METHODS: CRAB-BSI patients receiving tigecycline therapy or cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy between January 2012 and December 2017 was enrolled, and strict exclusion criteria were followed. The 28-day mortality of patients was analyzed. The impact of cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy on prognosis was evaluated using Cox multivariate regression analysis. The 28-day mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam monotherapy and cefoperazone/sulbactam-based combination therapy was also compared. RESULTS: Three hundred forty eight patients with CRAB-BSI were enrolled in the study. Two hundred ten patients were included after applying the exclusion criteria. Of these, 135 patients received tigecycline therapy and 75 patients received cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy. The 28-day mortality of patients in the latter group was, significantly lower than that of the tigecycline group [29.3% vs. 51.9%; P = 0.001]. Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy exerted a protective effect on the prognosis of patients [hazard ratio 0.566, 95% confidence interval (0.342–0.940); P = 0.028]. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis indicated that the 28-day mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy was lower than that of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam monotherapy, but the difference was not significant (22.2% vs. 40%; P = 0.074). However, the mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam with imipenem/cilastatin was significantly lower than that of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam monotherapy (P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy had a better clinical outcome. The mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam with imipenem/cilastatin seems to be the lowest. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13756-019-0502-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6404342/ /pubmed/30886705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0502-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Niu, Tianshui
Luo, Qixia
Li, Yaqing
Zhou, Yanzi
Yu, Wei
Xiao, Yonghong
Comparison of Tigecycline or Cefoperazone/Sulbactam therapy for bloodstream infection due to Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
title Comparison of Tigecycline or Cefoperazone/Sulbactam therapy for bloodstream infection due to Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
title_full Comparison of Tigecycline or Cefoperazone/Sulbactam therapy for bloodstream infection due to Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
title_fullStr Comparison of Tigecycline or Cefoperazone/Sulbactam therapy for bloodstream infection due to Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Tigecycline or Cefoperazone/Sulbactam therapy for bloodstream infection due to Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
title_short Comparison of Tigecycline or Cefoperazone/Sulbactam therapy for bloodstream infection due to Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
title_sort comparison of tigecycline or cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy for bloodstream infection due to carbapenem-resistant acinetobacter baumannii
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30886705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0502-x
work_keys_str_mv AT niutianshui comparisonoftigecyclineorcefoperazonesulbactamtherapyforbloodstreaminfectionduetocarbapenemresistantacinetobacterbaumannii
AT luoqixia comparisonoftigecyclineorcefoperazonesulbactamtherapyforbloodstreaminfectionduetocarbapenemresistantacinetobacterbaumannii
AT liyaqing comparisonoftigecyclineorcefoperazonesulbactamtherapyforbloodstreaminfectionduetocarbapenemresistantacinetobacterbaumannii
AT zhouyanzi comparisonoftigecyclineorcefoperazonesulbactamtherapyforbloodstreaminfectionduetocarbapenemresistantacinetobacterbaumannii
AT yuwei comparisonoftigecyclineorcefoperazonesulbactamtherapyforbloodstreaminfectionduetocarbapenemresistantacinetobacterbaumannii
AT xiaoyonghong comparisonoftigecyclineorcefoperazonesulbactamtherapyforbloodstreaminfectionduetocarbapenemresistantacinetobacterbaumannii