Cargando…
Improving outcome reporting in clinical trial reports and protocols: study protocol for the Instrument for reporting Planned Endpoints in Clinical Trials (InsPECT)
BACKGROUND: Inadequate and poor quality outcome reporting in clinical trials is a well-documented problem that impedes the ability of researchers to evaluate, replicate, synthesize, and build upon study findings and impacts evidence-based decision-making by patients, clinicians, and policy-makers. T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30841935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3248-0 |
_version_ | 1783400861760749568 |
---|---|
author | Butcher, Nancy J. Monsour, Andrea Mew, Emma J. Szatmari, Peter Pierro, Agostino Kelly, Lauren E. Farid-Kapadia, Mufiza Chee-a-tow, Alyssandra Saeed, Leena Monga, Suneeta Ungar, Wendy Terwee, Caroline B. Vohra, Sunita Fergusson, Dean Askie, Lisa M. Williamson, Paula R. Chan, An-Wen Moher, David Offringa, Martin |
author_facet | Butcher, Nancy J. Monsour, Andrea Mew, Emma J. Szatmari, Peter Pierro, Agostino Kelly, Lauren E. Farid-Kapadia, Mufiza Chee-a-tow, Alyssandra Saeed, Leena Monga, Suneeta Ungar, Wendy Terwee, Caroline B. Vohra, Sunita Fergusson, Dean Askie, Lisa M. Williamson, Paula R. Chan, An-Wen Moher, David Offringa, Martin |
author_sort | Butcher, Nancy J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Inadequate and poor quality outcome reporting in clinical trials is a well-documented problem that impedes the ability of researchers to evaluate, replicate, synthesize, and build upon study findings and impacts evidence-based decision-making by patients, clinicians, and policy-makers. To facilitate harmonized and transparent reporting of outcomes in trial protocols and published reports, the Instrument for reporting Planned Endpoints in Clinical Trials (InsPECT) is being developed. The final product will provide unique InsPECT extensions to the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) and CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) reporting guidelines. METHODS: The InsPECT SPIRIT and CONSORT extensions will be developed in accordance with the methodological framework created by the EQUATOR (Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research Quality) Network for reporting guideline development. Development will consist of (1) the creation of an initial list of candidate outcome reporting items synthesized from expert consultations and a scoping review of existing guidance for reporting outcomes in trial protocols and reports; (2) a three-round international Delphi study to identify additional candidate items and assess candidate item importance on a 9-point Likert scale, completed by stakeholders such as trial report and protocol authors, systematic review authors, biostatisticians and epidemiologists, reporting guideline developers, clinicians, journal editors, and research ethics board representatives; and (3) an in-person expert consensus meeting to finalize the set of essential outcome reporting items for trial protocols and reports, respectively. The consensus meeting discussions will be independently facilitated and informed by the empirical evidence identified in the primary literature and through the opinions (aggregate rankings and comments) collected via the Delphi study. An integrated knowledge translation approach will be used throughout InsPECT development to facilitate implementation and dissemination, in addition to standard post-development activities. DISCUSSION: InsPECT will provide evidence-informed and consensus-based standards focused on outcome reporting in clinical trials that can be applied across diverse disease areas, study populations, and outcomes. InsPECT will support the standardization of trial outcome reporting, which will maximize trial usability, reduce bias, foster trial replication, improve trial design and execution, and ultimately reduce research waste and help improve patient outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3248-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6404348 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64043482019-03-18 Improving outcome reporting in clinical trial reports and protocols: study protocol for the Instrument for reporting Planned Endpoints in Clinical Trials (InsPECT) Butcher, Nancy J. Monsour, Andrea Mew, Emma J. Szatmari, Peter Pierro, Agostino Kelly, Lauren E. Farid-Kapadia, Mufiza Chee-a-tow, Alyssandra Saeed, Leena Monga, Suneeta Ungar, Wendy Terwee, Caroline B. Vohra, Sunita Fergusson, Dean Askie, Lisa M. Williamson, Paula R. Chan, An-Wen Moher, David Offringa, Martin Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Inadequate and poor quality outcome reporting in clinical trials is a well-documented problem that impedes the ability of researchers to evaluate, replicate, synthesize, and build upon study findings and impacts evidence-based decision-making by patients, clinicians, and policy-makers. To facilitate harmonized and transparent reporting of outcomes in trial protocols and published reports, the Instrument for reporting Planned Endpoints in Clinical Trials (InsPECT) is being developed. The final product will provide unique InsPECT extensions to the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) and CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) reporting guidelines. METHODS: The InsPECT SPIRIT and CONSORT extensions will be developed in accordance with the methodological framework created by the EQUATOR (Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research Quality) Network for reporting guideline development. Development will consist of (1) the creation of an initial list of candidate outcome reporting items synthesized from expert consultations and a scoping review of existing guidance for reporting outcomes in trial protocols and reports; (2) a three-round international Delphi study to identify additional candidate items and assess candidate item importance on a 9-point Likert scale, completed by stakeholders such as trial report and protocol authors, systematic review authors, biostatisticians and epidemiologists, reporting guideline developers, clinicians, journal editors, and research ethics board representatives; and (3) an in-person expert consensus meeting to finalize the set of essential outcome reporting items for trial protocols and reports, respectively. The consensus meeting discussions will be independently facilitated and informed by the empirical evidence identified in the primary literature and through the opinions (aggregate rankings and comments) collected via the Delphi study. An integrated knowledge translation approach will be used throughout InsPECT development to facilitate implementation and dissemination, in addition to standard post-development activities. DISCUSSION: InsPECT will provide evidence-informed and consensus-based standards focused on outcome reporting in clinical trials that can be applied across diverse disease areas, study populations, and outcomes. InsPECT will support the standardization of trial outcome reporting, which will maximize trial usability, reduce bias, foster trial replication, improve trial design and execution, and ultimately reduce research waste and help improve patient outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3248-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6404348/ /pubmed/30841935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3248-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Butcher, Nancy J. Monsour, Andrea Mew, Emma J. Szatmari, Peter Pierro, Agostino Kelly, Lauren E. Farid-Kapadia, Mufiza Chee-a-tow, Alyssandra Saeed, Leena Monga, Suneeta Ungar, Wendy Terwee, Caroline B. Vohra, Sunita Fergusson, Dean Askie, Lisa M. Williamson, Paula R. Chan, An-Wen Moher, David Offringa, Martin Improving outcome reporting in clinical trial reports and protocols: study protocol for the Instrument for reporting Planned Endpoints in Clinical Trials (InsPECT) |
title | Improving outcome reporting in clinical trial reports and protocols: study protocol for the Instrument for reporting Planned Endpoints in Clinical Trials (InsPECT) |
title_full | Improving outcome reporting in clinical trial reports and protocols: study protocol for the Instrument for reporting Planned Endpoints in Clinical Trials (InsPECT) |
title_fullStr | Improving outcome reporting in clinical trial reports and protocols: study protocol for the Instrument for reporting Planned Endpoints in Clinical Trials (InsPECT) |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving outcome reporting in clinical trial reports and protocols: study protocol for the Instrument for reporting Planned Endpoints in Clinical Trials (InsPECT) |
title_short | Improving outcome reporting in clinical trial reports and protocols: study protocol for the Instrument for reporting Planned Endpoints in Clinical Trials (InsPECT) |
title_sort | improving outcome reporting in clinical trial reports and protocols: study protocol for the instrument for reporting planned endpoints in clinical trials (inspect) |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30841935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3248-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT butchernancyj improvingoutcomereportinginclinicaltrialreportsandprotocolsstudyprotocolfortheinstrumentforreportingplannedendpointsinclinicaltrialsinspect AT monsourandrea improvingoutcomereportinginclinicaltrialreportsandprotocolsstudyprotocolfortheinstrumentforreportingplannedendpointsinclinicaltrialsinspect AT mewemmaj improvingoutcomereportinginclinicaltrialreportsandprotocolsstudyprotocolfortheinstrumentforreportingplannedendpointsinclinicaltrialsinspect AT szatmaripeter improvingoutcomereportinginclinicaltrialreportsandprotocolsstudyprotocolfortheinstrumentforreportingplannedendpointsinclinicaltrialsinspect AT pierroagostino improvingoutcomereportinginclinicaltrialreportsandprotocolsstudyprotocolfortheinstrumentforreportingplannedendpointsinclinicaltrialsinspect AT kellylaurene improvingoutcomereportinginclinicaltrialreportsandprotocolsstudyprotocolfortheinstrumentforreportingplannedendpointsinclinicaltrialsinspect AT faridkapadiamufiza improvingoutcomereportinginclinicaltrialreportsandprotocolsstudyprotocolfortheinstrumentforreportingplannedendpointsinclinicaltrialsinspect AT cheeatowalyssandra improvingoutcomereportinginclinicaltrialreportsandprotocolsstudyprotocolfortheinstrumentforreportingplannedendpointsinclinicaltrialsinspect AT saeedleena improvingoutcomereportinginclinicaltrialreportsandprotocolsstudyprotocolfortheinstrumentforreportingplannedendpointsinclinicaltrialsinspect AT mongasuneeta improvingoutcomereportinginclinicaltrialreportsandprotocolsstudyprotocolfortheinstrumentforreportingplannedendpointsinclinicaltrialsinspect AT ungarwendy improvingoutcomereportinginclinicaltrialreportsandprotocolsstudyprotocolfortheinstrumentforreportingplannedendpointsinclinicaltrialsinspect AT terweecarolineb improvingoutcomereportinginclinicaltrialreportsandprotocolsstudyprotocolfortheinstrumentforreportingplannedendpointsinclinicaltrialsinspect AT vohrasunita improvingoutcomereportinginclinicaltrialreportsandprotocolsstudyprotocolfortheinstrumentforreportingplannedendpointsinclinicaltrialsinspect AT fergussondean improvingoutcomereportinginclinicaltrialreportsandprotocolsstudyprotocolfortheinstrumentforreportingplannedendpointsinclinicaltrialsinspect AT askielisam improvingoutcomereportinginclinicaltrialreportsandprotocolsstudyprotocolfortheinstrumentforreportingplannedendpointsinclinicaltrialsinspect AT williamsonpaular improvingoutcomereportinginclinicaltrialreportsandprotocolsstudyprotocolfortheinstrumentforreportingplannedendpointsinclinicaltrialsinspect AT chananwen improvingoutcomereportinginclinicaltrialreportsandprotocolsstudyprotocolfortheinstrumentforreportingplannedendpointsinclinicaltrialsinspect AT moherdavid improvingoutcomereportinginclinicaltrialreportsandprotocolsstudyprotocolfortheinstrumentforreportingplannedendpointsinclinicaltrialsinspect AT offringamartin improvingoutcomereportinginclinicaltrialreportsandprotocolsstudyprotocolfortheinstrumentforreportingplannedendpointsinclinicaltrialsinspect |