Cargando…
The ability of different peer review procedures to flag problematic publications
There is a mounting worry about erroneous and outright fraudulent research that gets published in the scientific literature. Although peer review’s ability to filter out such publications is contentious, several peer review innovations attempt to do just that. However, there is very little systemati...
Autores principales: | Horbach, S. P. J. M., Halffman, W. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30930504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2969-2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The changing forms and expectations of peer review
por: Horbach, S. P. J. M. ( Serge), et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Correction to: The changing forms and expectations of peer review
por: Horbach, S. P. J. M. (Serge), et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
What are innovations in peer review and editorial assessment for?
por: Halffman, Willem, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Promoting Virtue or Punishing Fraud: Mapping Contrasts in the Language of ‘Scientific Integrity’
por: Horbach, S. P. J. M., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
The ghosts of HeLa: How cell line misidentification contaminates the scientific literature
por: Horbach, Serge P. J. M., et al.
Publicado: (2017)