Cargando…

Relationship Between Electrocardiographic Findings and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Phenotypes in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND: The new designation of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy defines a broader spectrum of disease phenotypes, which include right dominant, biventricular, and left dominant variants. We evaluated the relationship between electrocardiographic findings and contrast‐enhanced cardiac magnetic reson...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Lazzari, Manuel, Zorzi, Alessandro, Cipriani, Alberto, Susana, Angela, Mastella, Giulio, Rizzo, Alessandro, Rigato, Ilaria, Bauce, Barbara, Giorgi, Benedetta, Lacognata, Carmelo, Iliceto, Sabino, Corrado, Domenico, Perazzolo Marra, Martina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30571483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009855
_version_ 1783400887072325632
author De Lazzari, Manuel
Zorzi, Alessandro
Cipriani, Alberto
Susana, Angela
Mastella, Giulio
Rizzo, Alessandro
Rigato, Ilaria
Bauce, Barbara
Giorgi, Benedetta
Lacognata, Carmelo
Iliceto, Sabino
Corrado, Domenico
Perazzolo Marra, Martina
author_facet De Lazzari, Manuel
Zorzi, Alessandro
Cipriani, Alberto
Susana, Angela
Mastella, Giulio
Rizzo, Alessandro
Rigato, Ilaria
Bauce, Barbara
Giorgi, Benedetta
Lacognata, Carmelo
Iliceto, Sabino
Corrado, Domenico
Perazzolo Marra, Martina
author_sort De Lazzari, Manuel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The new designation of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy defines a broader spectrum of disease phenotypes, which include right dominant, biventricular, and left dominant variants. We evaluated the relationship between electrocardiographic findings and contrast‐enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance phenotypes in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied a consecutive cohort of patients with a definite diagnosis of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, according to 2010 International Task Force criteria, who underwent electrocardiography and contrast‐enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance. Both depolarization and repolarization electrocardiographic abnormalities were correlated with the severity of dilatation/dysfunction, either global or regional, of both ventricles and the presence and regional distribution of late gadolinium enhancement. The study population included 79 patients (60% men). There was a statistically significant relationship between the presence and extent of T‐wave inversion across a 12‐lead ECG and increasing values of median right ventricular (RV) end‐diastolic volume (P<0.001) and decreasing values of RV ejection fraction (P<0.001). The extent of T‐wave inversion to lateral leads predicted a more severe RV dilatation rather than a left ventricular involvement because of the leftward displacement of the dilated RV, as evidenced by contrast‐enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance. A terminal activation delay of >55 ms in the right precordial leads (V1‐V3) was associated with higher RV volume (P=0.014) and lower RV ejection fraction (P=0.053). Low QRS voltages in limb leads predicted the presence (P=0.004) and amount (P<0.001) of left ventricular late gadolinium enhancement. CONCLUSIONS: The study results indicated that electrocardiographic abnormalities predict the arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy phenotype in terms of severity of RV disease and left ventricular involvement, which are among the most important determinants of the disease outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6404435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64044352019-03-18 Relationship Between Electrocardiographic Findings and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Phenotypes in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy De Lazzari, Manuel Zorzi, Alessandro Cipriani, Alberto Susana, Angela Mastella, Giulio Rizzo, Alessandro Rigato, Ilaria Bauce, Barbara Giorgi, Benedetta Lacognata, Carmelo Iliceto, Sabino Corrado, Domenico Perazzolo Marra, Martina J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: The new designation of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy defines a broader spectrum of disease phenotypes, which include right dominant, biventricular, and left dominant variants. We evaluated the relationship between electrocardiographic findings and contrast‐enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance phenotypes in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied a consecutive cohort of patients with a definite diagnosis of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, according to 2010 International Task Force criteria, who underwent electrocardiography and contrast‐enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance. Both depolarization and repolarization electrocardiographic abnormalities were correlated with the severity of dilatation/dysfunction, either global or regional, of both ventricles and the presence and regional distribution of late gadolinium enhancement. The study population included 79 patients (60% men). There was a statistically significant relationship between the presence and extent of T‐wave inversion across a 12‐lead ECG and increasing values of median right ventricular (RV) end‐diastolic volume (P<0.001) and decreasing values of RV ejection fraction (P<0.001). The extent of T‐wave inversion to lateral leads predicted a more severe RV dilatation rather than a left ventricular involvement because of the leftward displacement of the dilated RV, as evidenced by contrast‐enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance. A terminal activation delay of >55 ms in the right precordial leads (V1‐V3) was associated with higher RV volume (P=0.014) and lower RV ejection fraction (P=0.053). Low QRS voltages in limb leads predicted the presence (P=0.004) and amount (P<0.001) of left ventricular late gadolinium enhancement. CONCLUSIONS: The study results indicated that electrocardiographic abnormalities predict the arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy phenotype in terms of severity of RV disease and left ventricular involvement, which are among the most important determinants of the disease outcome. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6404435/ /pubmed/30571483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009855 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
De Lazzari, Manuel
Zorzi, Alessandro
Cipriani, Alberto
Susana, Angela
Mastella, Giulio
Rizzo, Alessandro
Rigato, Ilaria
Bauce, Barbara
Giorgi, Benedetta
Lacognata, Carmelo
Iliceto, Sabino
Corrado, Domenico
Perazzolo Marra, Martina
Relationship Between Electrocardiographic Findings and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Phenotypes in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy
title Relationship Between Electrocardiographic Findings and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Phenotypes in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy
title_full Relationship Between Electrocardiographic Findings and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Phenotypes in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy
title_fullStr Relationship Between Electrocardiographic Findings and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Phenotypes in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy
title_full_unstemmed Relationship Between Electrocardiographic Findings and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Phenotypes in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy
title_short Relationship Between Electrocardiographic Findings and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Phenotypes in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy
title_sort relationship between electrocardiographic findings and cardiac magnetic resonance phenotypes in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30571483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009855
work_keys_str_mv AT delazzarimanuel relationshipbetweenelectrocardiographicfindingsandcardiacmagneticresonancephenotypesinarrhythmogeniccardiomyopathy
AT zorzialessandro relationshipbetweenelectrocardiographicfindingsandcardiacmagneticresonancephenotypesinarrhythmogeniccardiomyopathy
AT ciprianialberto relationshipbetweenelectrocardiographicfindingsandcardiacmagneticresonancephenotypesinarrhythmogeniccardiomyopathy
AT susanaangela relationshipbetweenelectrocardiographicfindingsandcardiacmagneticresonancephenotypesinarrhythmogeniccardiomyopathy
AT mastellagiulio relationshipbetweenelectrocardiographicfindingsandcardiacmagneticresonancephenotypesinarrhythmogeniccardiomyopathy
AT rizzoalessandro relationshipbetweenelectrocardiographicfindingsandcardiacmagneticresonancephenotypesinarrhythmogeniccardiomyopathy
AT rigatoilaria relationshipbetweenelectrocardiographicfindingsandcardiacmagneticresonancephenotypesinarrhythmogeniccardiomyopathy
AT baucebarbara relationshipbetweenelectrocardiographicfindingsandcardiacmagneticresonancephenotypesinarrhythmogeniccardiomyopathy
AT giorgibenedetta relationshipbetweenelectrocardiographicfindingsandcardiacmagneticresonancephenotypesinarrhythmogeniccardiomyopathy
AT lacognatacarmelo relationshipbetweenelectrocardiographicfindingsandcardiacmagneticresonancephenotypesinarrhythmogeniccardiomyopathy
AT ilicetosabino relationshipbetweenelectrocardiographicfindingsandcardiacmagneticresonancephenotypesinarrhythmogeniccardiomyopathy
AT corradodomenico relationshipbetweenelectrocardiographicfindingsandcardiacmagneticresonancephenotypesinarrhythmogeniccardiomyopathy
AT perazzolomarramartina relationshipbetweenelectrocardiographicfindingsandcardiacmagneticresonancephenotypesinarrhythmogeniccardiomyopathy