Cargando…
Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery
BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the role of temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices for cardiogenic shock before left ventricular assist device (LVAD) surgery. This study sought to evaluate the trends of use and outcomes of MCS in cardiogenic shock before LVAD surgery. METHODS A...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30571481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.010193 |
_version_ | 1783400890100613120 |
---|---|
author | Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra Arora, Shilpkumar Lahewala, Sopan Kumar, Varun Shantha, Ghanshyam P. S. Jentzer, Jacob C. Stulak, John M. Gersh, Bernard J. Gulati, Rajiv Rihal, Charanjit S. Prasad, Abhiram Deshmukh, Abhishek J. |
author_facet | Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra Arora, Shilpkumar Lahewala, Sopan Kumar, Varun Shantha, Ghanshyam P. S. Jentzer, Jacob C. Stulak, John M. Gersh, Bernard J. Gulati, Rajiv Rihal, Charanjit S. Prasad, Abhiram Deshmukh, Abhishek J. |
author_sort | Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the role of temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices for cardiogenic shock before left ventricular assist device (LVAD) surgery. This study sought to evaluate the trends of use and outcomes of MCS in cardiogenic shock before LVAD surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a retrospective cohort study from 2005 to 2014 using the National Inpatient Sample (20% stratified sample of US hospitals). This study identified admissions undergoing LVAD surgery with preoperative cardiogenic shock. Admissions for other cardiac surgery and heart transplant were excluded. Temporary MCS was identified using administrative codes. The primary outcome was hospital mortality and secondary outcomes were hospital costs and lengths of stay in admissions with and without MCS use. In this 10‐year period, 9753 admissions were identified with 40.6% requiring pre‐LVAD MCS. There was a temporal increase in the frequency of cardiogenic shock associated with an increase in non–intra‐aortic balloon pump MCS devices. The cohort receiving MCS had greater in‐hospital myocardial infarction, ventricular arrhythmias, and use of coronary angiography. On multivariable analysis, older age, myocardial infarction, and need for MCS devices were independently predictive of higher in‐hospital mortality. In 696 propensity‐matched pairs, use of MCS was predictive of higher in‐hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.4 [95% confidence interval 1.1–1.6]; P=0.02) and higher hospital costs, but similar lengths of stay. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cardiogenic shock bridged to LVAD therapy, there was a steady increase in preoperative MCS use. Use of MCS identified patients at higher risk for in‐hospital mortality and greater resource utilization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6404446 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64044462019-03-18 Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra Arora, Shilpkumar Lahewala, Sopan Kumar, Varun Shantha, Ghanshyam P. S. Jentzer, Jacob C. Stulak, John M. Gersh, Bernard J. Gulati, Rajiv Rihal, Charanjit S. Prasad, Abhiram Deshmukh, Abhishek J. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the role of temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices for cardiogenic shock before left ventricular assist device (LVAD) surgery. This study sought to evaluate the trends of use and outcomes of MCS in cardiogenic shock before LVAD surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a retrospective cohort study from 2005 to 2014 using the National Inpatient Sample (20% stratified sample of US hospitals). This study identified admissions undergoing LVAD surgery with preoperative cardiogenic shock. Admissions for other cardiac surgery and heart transplant were excluded. Temporary MCS was identified using administrative codes. The primary outcome was hospital mortality and secondary outcomes were hospital costs and lengths of stay in admissions with and without MCS use. In this 10‐year period, 9753 admissions were identified with 40.6% requiring pre‐LVAD MCS. There was a temporal increase in the frequency of cardiogenic shock associated with an increase in non–intra‐aortic balloon pump MCS devices. The cohort receiving MCS had greater in‐hospital myocardial infarction, ventricular arrhythmias, and use of coronary angiography. On multivariable analysis, older age, myocardial infarction, and need for MCS devices were independently predictive of higher in‐hospital mortality. In 696 propensity‐matched pairs, use of MCS was predictive of higher in‐hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.4 [95% confidence interval 1.1–1.6]; P=0.02) and higher hospital costs, but similar lengths of stay. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cardiogenic shock bridged to LVAD therapy, there was a steady increase in preoperative MCS use. Use of MCS identified patients at higher risk for in‐hospital mortality and greater resource utilization. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6404446/ /pubmed/30571481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.010193 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra Arora, Shilpkumar Lahewala, Sopan Kumar, Varun Shantha, Ghanshyam P. S. Jentzer, Jacob C. Stulak, John M. Gersh, Bernard J. Gulati, Rajiv Rihal, Charanjit S. Prasad, Abhiram Deshmukh, Abhishek J. Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery |
title | Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery |
title_full | Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery |
title_fullStr | Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery |
title_short | Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery |
title_sort | temporary mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock before left ventricular assist device surgery |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30571481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.010193 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vallabhajosyulasaraschandra temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockbeforeleftventricularassistdevicesurgery AT arorashilpkumar temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockbeforeleftventricularassistdevicesurgery AT lahewalasopan temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockbeforeleftventricularassistdevicesurgery AT kumarvarun temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockbeforeleftventricularassistdevicesurgery AT shanthaghanshyamps temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockbeforeleftventricularassistdevicesurgery AT jentzerjacobc temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockbeforeleftventricularassistdevicesurgery AT stulakjohnm temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockbeforeleftventricularassistdevicesurgery AT gershbernardj temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockbeforeleftventricularassistdevicesurgery AT gulatirajiv temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockbeforeleftventricularassistdevicesurgery AT rihalcharanjits temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockbeforeleftventricularassistdevicesurgery AT prasadabhiram temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockbeforeleftventricularassistdevicesurgery AT deshmukhabhishekj temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockbeforeleftventricularassistdevicesurgery |