Cargando…

Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the role of temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices for cardiogenic shock before left ventricular assist device (LVAD) surgery. This study sought to evaluate the trends of use and outcomes of MCS in cardiogenic shock before LVAD surgery. METHODS A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra, Arora, Shilpkumar, Lahewala, Sopan, Kumar, Varun, Shantha, Ghanshyam P. S., Jentzer, Jacob C., Stulak, John M., Gersh, Bernard J., Gulati, Rajiv, Rihal, Charanjit S., Prasad, Abhiram, Deshmukh, Abhishek J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30571481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.010193
_version_ 1783400890100613120
author Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra
Arora, Shilpkumar
Lahewala, Sopan
Kumar, Varun
Shantha, Ghanshyam P. S.
Jentzer, Jacob C.
Stulak, John M.
Gersh, Bernard J.
Gulati, Rajiv
Rihal, Charanjit S.
Prasad, Abhiram
Deshmukh, Abhishek J.
author_facet Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra
Arora, Shilpkumar
Lahewala, Sopan
Kumar, Varun
Shantha, Ghanshyam P. S.
Jentzer, Jacob C.
Stulak, John M.
Gersh, Bernard J.
Gulati, Rajiv
Rihal, Charanjit S.
Prasad, Abhiram
Deshmukh, Abhishek J.
author_sort Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the role of temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices for cardiogenic shock before left ventricular assist device (LVAD) surgery. This study sought to evaluate the trends of use and outcomes of MCS in cardiogenic shock before LVAD surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a retrospective cohort study from 2005 to 2014 using the National Inpatient Sample (20% stratified sample of US hospitals). This study identified admissions undergoing LVAD surgery with preoperative cardiogenic shock. Admissions for other cardiac surgery and heart transplant were excluded. Temporary MCS was identified using administrative codes. The primary outcome was hospital mortality and secondary outcomes were hospital costs and lengths of stay in admissions with and without MCS use. In this 10‐year period, 9753 admissions were identified with 40.6% requiring pre‐LVAD MCS. There was a temporal increase in the frequency of cardiogenic shock associated with an increase in non–intra‐aortic balloon pump MCS devices. The cohort receiving MCS had greater in‐hospital myocardial infarction, ventricular arrhythmias, and use of coronary angiography. On multivariable analysis, older age, myocardial infarction, and need for MCS devices were independently predictive of higher in‐hospital mortality. In 696 propensity‐matched pairs, use of MCS was predictive of higher in‐hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.4 [95% confidence interval 1.1–1.6]; P=0.02) and higher hospital costs, but similar lengths of stay. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cardiogenic shock bridged to LVAD therapy, there was a steady increase in preoperative MCS use. Use of MCS identified patients at higher risk for in‐hospital mortality and greater resource utilization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6404446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64044462019-03-18 Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra Arora, Shilpkumar Lahewala, Sopan Kumar, Varun Shantha, Ghanshyam P. S. Jentzer, Jacob C. Stulak, John M. Gersh, Bernard J. Gulati, Rajiv Rihal, Charanjit S. Prasad, Abhiram Deshmukh, Abhishek J. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the role of temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices for cardiogenic shock before left ventricular assist device (LVAD) surgery. This study sought to evaluate the trends of use and outcomes of MCS in cardiogenic shock before LVAD surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a retrospective cohort study from 2005 to 2014 using the National Inpatient Sample (20% stratified sample of US hospitals). This study identified admissions undergoing LVAD surgery with preoperative cardiogenic shock. Admissions for other cardiac surgery and heart transplant were excluded. Temporary MCS was identified using administrative codes. The primary outcome was hospital mortality and secondary outcomes were hospital costs and lengths of stay in admissions with and without MCS use. In this 10‐year period, 9753 admissions were identified with 40.6% requiring pre‐LVAD MCS. There was a temporal increase in the frequency of cardiogenic shock associated with an increase in non–intra‐aortic balloon pump MCS devices. The cohort receiving MCS had greater in‐hospital myocardial infarction, ventricular arrhythmias, and use of coronary angiography. On multivariable analysis, older age, myocardial infarction, and need for MCS devices were independently predictive of higher in‐hospital mortality. In 696 propensity‐matched pairs, use of MCS was predictive of higher in‐hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.4 [95% confidence interval 1.1–1.6]; P=0.02) and higher hospital costs, but similar lengths of stay. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cardiogenic shock bridged to LVAD therapy, there was a steady increase in preoperative MCS use. Use of MCS identified patients at higher risk for in‐hospital mortality and greater resource utilization. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6404446/ /pubmed/30571481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.010193 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra
Arora, Shilpkumar
Lahewala, Sopan
Kumar, Varun
Shantha, Ghanshyam P. S.
Jentzer, Jacob C.
Stulak, John M.
Gersh, Bernard J.
Gulati, Rajiv
Rihal, Charanjit S.
Prasad, Abhiram
Deshmukh, Abhishek J.
Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery
title Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery
title_full Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery
title_fullStr Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery
title_short Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery
title_sort temporary mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock before left ventricular assist device surgery
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30571481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.010193
work_keys_str_mv AT vallabhajosyulasaraschandra temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockbeforeleftventricularassistdevicesurgery
AT arorashilpkumar temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockbeforeleftventricularassistdevicesurgery
AT lahewalasopan temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockbeforeleftventricularassistdevicesurgery
AT kumarvarun temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockbeforeleftventricularassistdevicesurgery
AT shanthaghanshyamps temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockbeforeleftventricularassistdevicesurgery
AT jentzerjacobc temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockbeforeleftventricularassistdevicesurgery
AT stulakjohnm temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockbeforeleftventricularassistdevicesurgery
AT gershbernardj temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockbeforeleftventricularassistdevicesurgery
AT gulatirajiv temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockbeforeleftventricularassistdevicesurgery
AT rihalcharanjits temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockbeforeleftventricularassistdevicesurgery
AT prasadabhiram temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockbeforeleftventricularassistdevicesurgery
AT deshmukhabhishekj temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockbeforeleftventricularassistdevicesurgery