Cargando…

Sustained effects of neurofeedback in ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Neurofeedback (NF) has gained increasing interest in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Given learning principles underlie NF, lasting clinical treatment effects may be expected. This systematic review and meta-analysis addresses the sustainability of neurofeedback and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Doren, Jessica, Arns, Martijn, Heinrich, Hartmut, Vollebregt, Madelon A., Strehl, Ute, K. Loo, Sandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29445867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-018-1121-4
_version_ 1783400933679431680
author Van Doren, Jessica
Arns, Martijn
Heinrich, Hartmut
Vollebregt, Madelon A.
Strehl, Ute
K. Loo, Sandra
author_facet Van Doren, Jessica
Arns, Martijn
Heinrich, Hartmut
Vollebregt, Madelon A.
Strehl, Ute
K. Loo, Sandra
author_sort Van Doren, Jessica
collection PubMed
description Neurofeedback (NF) has gained increasing interest in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Given learning principles underlie NF, lasting clinical treatment effects may be expected. This systematic review and meta-analysis addresses the sustainability of neurofeedback and control treatment effects by considering randomized controlled studies that conducted follow-up (FU; 2–12 months) assessments among children with ADHD. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched through November 2017. Within-group and between-group standardized mean differences (SMD) of parent behavior ratings were calculated and analyzed. Ten studies met inclusion criteria (NF: ten studies, N = 256; control: nine studies, N = 250). Within-group NF effects on inattention were of medium effect size (ES) (SMD = 0.64) at post-treatment and increased to a large ES (SMD = 0.80) at FU. Regarding hyperactivity/impulsivity, NF ES were medium at post-treatment (SMD = 0.50) and FU (SMD = 0.61). Non-active control conditions yielded a small significant ES on inattention at post-treatment (SMD = 0.28) but no significant ES at FU. Active treatments (mainly methylphenidate), had large ES for inattention (post: SMD = 1.08; FU: SMD = 1.06) and medium ES for hyperactivity/impulsivity (post: SMD = 0.74; FU: SMD = 0.67). Between-group analyses also revealed an advantage of NF over non-active controls [inattention (post: SMD = 0.38; FU: SMD = 0.57); hyperactivity–impulsivity (post: SMD = 0.25; FU: SMD = 0.39)], and favored active controls for inattention only at pre-post (SMD = − 0.44). Compared to non-active control treatments, NF appears to have more durable treatment effects, for at least 6 months following treatment. More studies are needed for a properly powered comparison of follow-up effects between NF and active treatments and to further control for non-specific effects. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00787-018-1121-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6404655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64046552019-03-27 Sustained effects of neurofeedback in ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis Van Doren, Jessica Arns, Martijn Heinrich, Hartmut Vollebregt, Madelon A. Strehl, Ute K. Loo, Sandra Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Review Neurofeedback (NF) has gained increasing interest in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Given learning principles underlie NF, lasting clinical treatment effects may be expected. This systematic review and meta-analysis addresses the sustainability of neurofeedback and control treatment effects by considering randomized controlled studies that conducted follow-up (FU; 2–12 months) assessments among children with ADHD. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched through November 2017. Within-group and between-group standardized mean differences (SMD) of parent behavior ratings were calculated and analyzed. Ten studies met inclusion criteria (NF: ten studies, N = 256; control: nine studies, N = 250). Within-group NF effects on inattention were of medium effect size (ES) (SMD = 0.64) at post-treatment and increased to a large ES (SMD = 0.80) at FU. Regarding hyperactivity/impulsivity, NF ES were medium at post-treatment (SMD = 0.50) and FU (SMD = 0.61). Non-active control conditions yielded a small significant ES on inattention at post-treatment (SMD = 0.28) but no significant ES at FU. Active treatments (mainly methylphenidate), had large ES for inattention (post: SMD = 1.08; FU: SMD = 1.06) and medium ES for hyperactivity/impulsivity (post: SMD = 0.74; FU: SMD = 0.67). Between-group analyses also revealed an advantage of NF over non-active controls [inattention (post: SMD = 0.38; FU: SMD = 0.57); hyperactivity–impulsivity (post: SMD = 0.25; FU: SMD = 0.39)], and favored active controls for inattention only at pre-post (SMD = − 0.44). Compared to non-active control treatments, NF appears to have more durable treatment effects, for at least 6 months following treatment. More studies are needed for a properly powered comparison of follow-up effects between NF and active treatments and to further control for non-specific effects. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00787-018-1121-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-02-14 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6404655/ /pubmed/29445867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-018-1121-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Van Doren, Jessica
Arns, Martijn
Heinrich, Hartmut
Vollebregt, Madelon A.
Strehl, Ute
K. Loo, Sandra
Sustained effects of neurofeedback in ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Sustained effects of neurofeedback in ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Sustained effects of neurofeedback in ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Sustained effects of neurofeedback in ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Sustained effects of neurofeedback in ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Sustained effects of neurofeedback in ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort sustained effects of neurofeedback in adhd: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29445867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-018-1121-4
work_keys_str_mv AT vandorenjessica sustainedeffectsofneurofeedbackinadhdasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT arnsmartijn sustainedeffectsofneurofeedbackinadhdasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT heinrichhartmut sustainedeffectsofneurofeedbackinadhdasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vollebregtmadelona sustainedeffectsofneurofeedbackinadhdasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT strehlute sustainedeffectsofneurofeedbackinadhdasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kloosandra sustainedeffectsofneurofeedbackinadhdasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis