Cargando…
Sustained effects of neurofeedback in ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Neurofeedback (NF) has gained increasing interest in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Given learning principles underlie NF, lasting clinical treatment effects may be expected. This systematic review and meta-analysis addresses the sustainability of neurofeedback and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29445867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-018-1121-4 |
_version_ | 1783400933679431680 |
---|---|
author | Van Doren, Jessica Arns, Martijn Heinrich, Hartmut Vollebregt, Madelon A. Strehl, Ute K. Loo, Sandra |
author_facet | Van Doren, Jessica Arns, Martijn Heinrich, Hartmut Vollebregt, Madelon A. Strehl, Ute K. Loo, Sandra |
author_sort | Van Doren, Jessica |
collection | PubMed |
description | Neurofeedback (NF) has gained increasing interest in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Given learning principles underlie NF, lasting clinical treatment effects may be expected. This systematic review and meta-analysis addresses the sustainability of neurofeedback and control treatment effects by considering randomized controlled studies that conducted follow-up (FU; 2–12 months) assessments among children with ADHD. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched through November 2017. Within-group and between-group standardized mean differences (SMD) of parent behavior ratings were calculated and analyzed. Ten studies met inclusion criteria (NF: ten studies, N = 256; control: nine studies, N = 250). Within-group NF effects on inattention were of medium effect size (ES) (SMD = 0.64) at post-treatment and increased to a large ES (SMD = 0.80) at FU. Regarding hyperactivity/impulsivity, NF ES were medium at post-treatment (SMD = 0.50) and FU (SMD = 0.61). Non-active control conditions yielded a small significant ES on inattention at post-treatment (SMD = 0.28) but no significant ES at FU. Active treatments (mainly methylphenidate), had large ES for inattention (post: SMD = 1.08; FU: SMD = 1.06) and medium ES for hyperactivity/impulsivity (post: SMD = 0.74; FU: SMD = 0.67). Between-group analyses also revealed an advantage of NF over non-active controls [inattention (post: SMD = 0.38; FU: SMD = 0.57); hyperactivity–impulsivity (post: SMD = 0.25; FU: SMD = 0.39)], and favored active controls for inattention only at pre-post (SMD = − 0.44). Compared to non-active control treatments, NF appears to have more durable treatment effects, for at least 6 months following treatment. More studies are needed for a properly powered comparison of follow-up effects between NF and active treatments and to further control for non-specific effects. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00787-018-1121-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6404655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64046552019-03-27 Sustained effects of neurofeedback in ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis Van Doren, Jessica Arns, Martijn Heinrich, Hartmut Vollebregt, Madelon A. Strehl, Ute K. Loo, Sandra Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Review Neurofeedback (NF) has gained increasing interest in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Given learning principles underlie NF, lasting clinical treatment effects may be expected. This systematic review and meta-analysis addresses the sustainability of neurofeedback and control treatment effects by considering randomized controlled studies that conducted follow-up (FU; 2–12 months) assessments among children with ADHD. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched through November 2017. Within-group and between-group standardized mean differences (SMD) of parent behavior ratings were calculated and analyzed. Ten studies met inclusion criteria (NF: ten studies, N = 256; control: nine studies, N = 250). Within-group NF effects on inattention were of medium effect size (ES) (SMD = 0.64) at post-treatment and increased to a large ES (SMD = 0.80) at FU. Regarding hyperactivity/impulsivity, NF ES were medium at post-treatment (SMD = 0.50) and FU (SMD = 0.61). Non-active control conditions yielded a small significant ES on inattention at post-treatment (SMD = 0.28) but no significant ES at FU. Active treatments (mainly methylphenidate), had large ES for inattention (post: SMD = 1.08; FU: SMD = 1.06) and medium ES for hyperactivity/impulsivity (post: SMD = 0.74; FU: SMD = 0.67). Between-group analyses also revealed an advantage of NF over non-active controls [inattention (post: SMD = 0.38; FU: SMD = 0.57); hyperactivity–impulsivity (post: SMD = 0.25; FU: SMD = 0.39)], and favored active controls for inattention only at pre-post (SMD = − 0.44). Compared to non-active control treatments, NF appears to have more durable treatment effects, for at least 6 months following treatment. More studies are needed for a properly powered comparison of follow-up effects between NF and active treatments and to further control for non-specific effects. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00787-018-1121-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-02-14 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6404655/ /pubmed/29445867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-018-1121-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Van Doren, Jessica Arns, Martijn Heinrich, Hartmut Vollebregt, Madelon A. Strehl, Ute K. Loo, Sandra Sustained effects of neurofeedback in ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Sustained effects of neurofeedback in ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Sustained effects of neurofeedback in ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Sustained effects of neurofeedback in ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Sustained effects of neurofeedback in ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Sustained effects of neurofeedback in ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | sustained effects of neurofeedback in adhd: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29445867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-018-1121-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandorenjessica sustainedeffectsofneurofeedbackinadhdasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT arnsmartijn sustainedeffectsofneurofeedbackinadhdasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT heinrichhartmut sustainedeffectsofneurofeedbackinadhdasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vollebregtmadelona sustainedeffectsofneurofeedbackinadhdasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT strehlute sustainedeffectsofneurofeedbackinadhdasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kloosandra sustainedeffectsofneurofeedbackinadhdasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |