Cargando…

Comparison of Cardiovascular Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke Type in Women

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular risk factors have differential effects on various manifestations of cardiovascular disease, but to date direct formal comparisons are scarce, have been conducted primarily in men, and include only traditional risk factors. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using data from the multi‐eth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leening, Maarten J. G., Cook, Nancy R., Franco, Oscar H., Manson, JoAnn E., Lakshminarayan, Kamakshi, LaMonte, Michael J., Leira, Enrique C., Robinson, Jennifer G., Ridker, Paul M, Paynter, Nina P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30371339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007514
_version_ 1783400970981474304
author Leening, Maarten J. G.
Cook, Nancy R.
Franco, Oscar H.
Manson, JoAnn E.
Lakshminarayan, Kamakshi
LaMonte, Michael J.
Leira, Enrique C.
Robinson, Jennifer G.
Ridker, Paul M
Paynter, Nina P.
author_facet Leening, Maarten J. G.
Cook, Nancy R.
Franco, Oscar H.
Manson, JoAnn E.
Lakshminarayan, Kamakshi
LaMonte, Michael J.
Leira, Enrique C.
Robinson, Jennifer G.
Ridker, Paul M
Paynter, Nina P.
author_sort Leening, Maarten J. G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular risk factors have differential effects on various manifestations of cardiovascular disease, but to date direct formal comparisons are scarce, have been conducted primarily in men, and include only traditional risk factors. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using data from the multi‐ethnic Women's Health Initiative Observational Study, we used a case–cohort design to compare 1731 women with incident cardiovascular disease during follow‐up to a cohort of 1914 women. The direction of effect of all 24 risk factors (including various apolipoproteins, hemoglobin A1(c), high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein, N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide, and tissue plasminogen activator antigen) was concordant for coronary heart disease (CHD, defined as myocardial infarction and CHD death) and ischemic stroke; however, associations were generally stronger with CHD. Significant differences for multiple risk factors, including blood pressure, lipid levels, and measures of inflammation, were observed when comparing the effects on hemorrhagic stroke with those on ischemic outcomes. For instance, multivariable adjusted hazard ratios per standard deviation increase in non–high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol were 1.16 (95% confidence interval, 1.06–1.28) for CHD, 0.97 (0.88–1.07) for ischemic stroke, and 0.76 (0.63–0.91) for hemorrhagic stroke (P<0.05 for equal association). Model discrimination was better for models predicting CHD or ischemic stroke than for models predicting hemorrhagic stroke or a combined end point. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiovascular risk factors have largely similar effects on incidence of CHD and ischemic stroke in women, although the magnitude of association varies. Determinants of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke substantially differ, underscoring their distinct biology. Cardiovascular disease risk may be more accurately reflected when combined cardiovascular disease or cerebrovascular outcomes are broken down into different first manifestations, or when restricted to ischemic outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6404882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64048822019-03-19 Comparison of Cardiovascular Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke Type in Women Leening, Maarten J. G. Cook, Nancy R. Franco, Oscar H. Manson, JoAnn E. Lakshminarayan, Kamakshi LaMonte, Michael J. Leira, Enrique C. Robinson, Jennifer G. Ridker, Paul M Paynter, Nina P. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular risk factors have differential effects on various manifestations of cardiovascular disease, but to date direct formal comparisons are scarce, have been conducted primarily in men, and include only traditional risk factors. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using data from the multi‐ethnic Women's Health Initiative Observational Study, we used a case–cohort design to compare 1731 women with incident cardiovascular disease during follow‐up to a cohort of 1914 women. The direction of effect of all 24 risk factors (including various apolipoproteins, hemoglobin A1(c), high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein, N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide, and tissue plasminogen activator antigen) was concordant for coronary heart disease (CHD, defined as myocardial infarction and CHD death) and ischemic stroke; however, associations were generally stronger with CHD. Significant differences for multiple risk factors, including blood pressure, lipid levels, and measures of inflammation, were observed when comparing the effects on hemorrhagic stroke with those on ischemic outcomes. For instance, multivariable adjusted hazard ratios per standard deviation increase in non–high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol were 1.16 (95% confidence interval, 1.06–1.28) for CHD, 0.97 (0.88–1.07) for ischemic stroke, and 0.76 (0.63–0.91) for hemorrhagic stroke (P<0.05 for equal association). Model discrimination was better for models predicting CHD or ischemic stroke than for models predicting hemorrhagic stroke or a combined end point. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiovascular risk factors have largely similar effects on incidence of CHD and ischemic stroke in women, although the magnitude of association varies. Determinants of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke substantially differ, underscoring their distinct biology. Cardiovascular disease risk may be more accurately reflected when combined cardiovascular disease or cerebrovascular outcomes are broken down into different first manifestations, or when restricted to ischemic outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6404882/ /pubmed/30371339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007514 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Leening, Maarten J. G.
Cook, Nancy R.
Franco, Oscar H.
Manson, JoAnn E.
Lakshminarayan, Kamakshi
LaMonte, Michael J.
Leira, Enrique C.
Robinson, Jennifer G.
Ridker, Paul M
Paynter, Nina P.
Comparison of Cardiovascular Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke Type in Women
title Comparison of Cardiovascular Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke Type in Women
title_full Comparison of Cardiovascular Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke Type in Women
title_fullStr Comparison of Cardiovascular Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke Type in Women
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Cardiovascular Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke Type in Women
title_short Comparison of Cardiovascular Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke Type in Women
title_sort comparison of cardiovascular risk factors for coronary heart disease and stroke type in women
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30371339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007514
work_keys_str_mv AT leeningmaartenjg comparisonofcardiovascularriskfactorsforcoronaryheartdiseaseandstroketypeinwomen
AT cooknancyr comparisonofcardiovascularriskfactorsforcoronaryheartdiseaseandstroketypeinwomen
AT francooscarh comparisonofcardiovascularriskfactorsforcoronaryheartdiseaseandstroketypeinwomen
AT mansonjoanne comparisonofcardiovascularriskfactorsforcoronaryheartdiseaseandstroketypeinwomen
AT lakshminarayankamakshi comparisonofcardiovascularriskfactorsforcoronaryheartdiseaseandstroketypeinwomen
AT lamontemichaelj comparisonofcardiovascularriskfactorsforcoronaryheartdiseaseandstroketypeinwomen
AT leiraenriquec comparisonofcardiovascularriskfactorsforcoronaryheartdiseaseandstroketypeinwomen
AT robinsonjenniferg comparisonofcardiovascularriskfactorsforcoronaryheartdiseaseandstroketypeinwomen
AT ridkerpaulm comparisonofcardiovascularriskfactorsforcoronaryheartdiseaseandstroketypeinwomen
AT paynterninap comparisonofcardiovascularriskfactorsforcoronaryheartdiseaseandstroketypeinwomen