Cargando…

No Differences in Levels of Circulating Progenitor Endothelial Cells or Circulating Endothelial Cells Among Patients Treated With Ticagrelor Compared With Clopidogrel During Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND: Ticagrelor use during acute coronary syndromes demonstrated a decrease in all‐cause mortality in the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial. This effect has been attributed to a non–platelet‐derived improvement in endothelial function. The aim of this study was to determi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Diego‐Nieto, Alejandro, Vidriales, Maria B., Alonso‐Orcajo, Norberto, Moreno‐Samos, Jose C., Martin‐Herrero, Francisco, Carbonell, Raul, Cid, Belen, Cruz‐Gonzalez, Ignacio, Martin‐Moreiras, Javier C., Cuellas, Carlos, Pascual, Cristina, Lopez‐Benito, Maria, Sanchez, Pedro L., Fernandez‐Vazquez, Felipe, de Prado, Armando Perez
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30371302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009444
_version_ 1783400978302631936
author Diego‐Nieto, Alejandro
Vidriales, Maria B.
Alonso‐Orcajo, Norberto
Moreno‐Samos, Jose C.
Martin‐Herrero, Francisco
Carbonell, Raul
Cid, Belen
Cruz‐Gonzalez, Ignacio
Martin‐Moreiras, Javier C.
Cuellas, Carlos
Pascual, Cristina
Lopez‐Benito, Maria
Sanchez, Pedro L.
Fernandez‐Vazquez, Felipe
de Prado, Armando Perez
author_facet Diego‐Nieto, Alejandro
Vidriales, Maria B.
Alonso‐Orcajo, Norberto
Moreno‐Samos, Jose C.
Martin‐Herrero, Francisco
Carbonell, Raul
Cid, Belen
Cruz‐Gonzalez, Ignacio
Martin‐Moreiras, Javier C.
Cuellas, Carlos
Pascual, Cristina
Lopez‐Benito, Maria
Sanchez, Pedro L.
Fernandez‐Vazquez, Felipe
de Prado, Armando Perez
author_sort Diego‐Nieto, Alejandro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ticagrelor use during acute coronary syndromes demonstrated a decrease in all‐cause mortality in the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial. This effect has been attributed to a non–platelet‐derived improvement in endothelial function. The aim of this study was to determine differences in the number of endothelial progenitor cells and/or circulating endothelial cells found in peripheral blood in patients treated with either ticagrelor or clopidogrel during non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multicenter, randomized study (NCT02244710), patients were considered for inclusion after non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction whenever they were P2Y(12)‐inhibitor naïve. Ticagrelor and clopidogrel were allocated at a 1:1 ratio. Blood samples for determining endothelial progenitor cells and circulating endothelial cells were extracted before the antiplatelet loading dose, 48 hours after presentation of index symptoms, and 1 month after the event. A multichannel cytometer was used for optimal cell characterization. A total of 96 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Circulating endothelial cell levels corrected by white blood cells were as follows at baseline, 48 hours, and 1 month: 44 (28–64), 50 (33–63), and 38 (23–62) cells/mL, respectively, for clopidogrel and 38 (29–60), 45 (32–85), and 35 (24–71) cells/mL, respectively, for ticagrelor (P=0.6). Endothelial progenitor cell levels were 29 (15–47), 27 (15–33), and 18 (10–25) cells/mL, respectively, for clopidogrel and 20 (11–33), 22 (12–32), and 18 (11–29) cells/mL, respectively, for ticagrelor (P=0.9). No differences in intraindividual changes were found. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with ticagrelor during non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction, in comparison to clopidogrel, showed similar levels of endothelial progenitor cells and circulating endothelial cells. These data suggest that the endothelial protective effect mediated by ticagrelor is not related to bone marrow physiology modulation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02244710.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6404906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64049062019-03-19 No Differences in Levels of Circulating Progenitor Endothelial Cells or Circulating Endothelial Cells Among Patients Treated With Ticagrelor Compared With Clopidogrel During Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Diego‐Nieto, Alejandro Vidriales, Maria B. Alonso‐Orcajo, Norberto Moreno‐Samos, Jose C. Martin‐Herrero, Francisco Carbonell, Raul Cid, Belen Cruz‐Gonzalez, Ignacio Martin‐Moreiras, Javier C. Cuellas, Carlos Pascual, Cristina Lopez‐Benito, Maria Sanchez, Pedro L. Fernandez‐Vazquez, Felipe de Prado, Armando Perez J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Ticagrelor use during acute coronary syndromes demonstrated a decrease in all‐cause mortality in the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial. This effect has been attributed to a non–platelet‐derived improvement in endothelial function. The aim of this study was to determine differences in the number of endothelial progenitor cells and/or circulating endothelial cells found in peripheral blood in patients treated with either ticagrelor or clopidogrel during non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multicenter, randomized study (NCT02244710), patients were considered for inclusion after non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction whenever they were P2Y(12)‐inhibitor naïve. Ticagrelor and clopidogrel were allocated at a 1:1 ratio. Blood samples for determining endothelial progenitor cells and circulating endothelial cells were extracted before the antiplatelet loading dose, 48 hours after presentation of index symptoms, and 1 month after the event. A multichannel cytometer was used for optimal cell characterization. A total of 96 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Circulating endothelial cell levels corrected by white blood cells were as follows at baseline, 48 hours, and 1 month: 44 (28–64), 50 (33–63), and 38 (23–62) cells/mL, respectively, for clopidogrel and 38 (29–60), 45 (32–85), and 35 (24–71) cells/mL, respectively, for ticagrelor (P=0.6). Endothelial progenitor cell levels were 29 (15–47), 27 (15–33), and 18 (10–25) cells/mL, respectively, for clopidogrel and 20 (11–33), 22 (12–32), and 18 (11–29) cells/mL, respectively, for ticagrelor (P=0.9). No differences in intraindividual changes were found. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with ticagrelor during non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction, in comparison to clopidogrel, showed similar levels of endothelial progenitor cells and circulating endothelial cells. These data suggest that the endothelial protective effect mediated by ticagrelor is not related to bone marrow physiology modulation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02244710. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6404906/ /pubmed/30371302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009444 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Diego‐Nieto, Alejandro
Vidriales, Maria B.
Alonso‐Orcajo, Norberto
Moreno‐Samos, Jose C.
Martin‐Herrero, Francisco
Carbonell, Raul
Cid, Belen
Cruz‐Gonzalez, Ignacio
Martin‐Moreiras, Javier C.
Cuellas, Carlos
Pascual, Cristina
Lopez‐Benito, Maria
Sanchez, Pedro L.
Fernandez‐Vazquez, Felipe
de Prado, Armando Perez
No Differences in Levels of Circulating Progenitor Endothelial Cells or Circulating Endothelial Cells Among Patients Treated With Ticagrelor Compared With Clopidogrel During Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title No Differences in Levels of Circulating Progenitor Endothelial Cells or Circulating Endothelial Cells Among Patients Treated With Ticagrelor Compared With Clopidogrel During Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_full No Differences in Levels of Circulating Progenitor Endothelial Cells or Circulating Endothelial Cells Among Patients Treated With Ticagrelor Compared With Clopidogrel During Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_fullStr No Differences in Levels of Circulating Progenitor Endothelial Cells or Circulating Endothelial Cells Among Patients Treated With Ticagrelor Compared With Clopidogrel During Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_full_unstemmed No Differences in Levels of Circulating Progenitor Endothelial Cells or Circulating Endothelial Cells Among Patients Treated With Ticagrelor Compared With Clopidogrel During Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_short No Differences in Levels of Circulating Progenitor Endothelial Cells or Circulating Endothelial Cells Among Patients Treated With Ticagrelor Compared With Clopidogrel During Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_sort no differences in levels of circulating progenitor endothelial cells or circulating endothelial cells among patients treated with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel during non–st‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30371302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009444
work_keys_str_mv AT diegonietoalejandro nodifferencesinlevelsofcirculatingprogenitorendothelialcellsorcirculatingendothelialcellsamongpatientstreatedwithticagrelorcomparedwithclopidogrelduringnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT vidrialesmariab nodifferencesinlevelsofcirculatingprogenitorendothelialcellsorcirculatingendothelialcellsamongpatientstreatedwithticagrelorcomparedwithclopidogrelduringnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT alonsoorcajonorberto nodifferencesinlevelsofcirculatingprogenitorendothelialcellsorcirculatingendothelialcellsamongpatientstreatedwithticagrelorcomparedwithclopidogrelduringnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT morenosamosjosec nodifferencesinlevelsofcirculatingprogenitorendothelialcellsorcirculatingendothelialcellsamongpatientstreatedwithticagrelorcomparedwithclopidogrelduringnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT martinherrerofrancisco nodifferencesinlevelsofcirculatingprogenitorendothelialcellsorcirculatingendothelialcellsamongpatientstreatedwithticagrelorcomparedwithclopidogrelduringnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT carbonellraul nodifferencesinlevelsofcirculatingprogenitorendothelialcellsorcirculatingendothelialcellsamongpatientstreatedwithticagrelorcomparedwithclopidogrelduringnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT cidbelen nodifferencesinlevelsofcirculatingprogenitorendothelialcellsorcirculatingendothelialcellsamongpatientstreatedwithticagrelorcomparedwithclopidogrelduringnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT cruzgonzalezignacio nodifferencesinlevelsofcirculatingprogenitorendothelialcellsorcirculatingendothelialcellsamongpatientstreatedwithticagrelorcomparedwithclopidogrelduringnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT martinmoreirasjavierc nodifferencesinlevelsofcirculatingprogenitorendothelialcellsorcirculatingendothelialcellsamongpatientstreatedwithticagrelorcomparedwithclopidogrelduringnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT cuellascarlos nodifferencesinlevelsofcirculatingprogenitorendothelialcellsorcirculatingendothelialcellsamongpatientstreatedwithticagrelorcomparedwithclopidogrelduringnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT pascualcristina nodifferencesinlevelsofcirculatingprogenitorendothelialcellsorcirculatingendothelialcellsamongpatientstreatedwithticagrelorcomparedwithclopidogrelduringnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT lopezbenitomaria nodifferencesinlevelsofcirculatingprogenitorendothelialcellsorcirculatingendothelialcellsamongpatientstreatedwithticagrelorcomparedwithclopidogrelduringnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT sanchezpedrol nodifferencesinlevelsofcirculatingprogenitorendothelialcellsorcirculatingendothelialcellsamongpatientstreatedwithticagrelorcomparedwithclopidogrelduringnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT fernandezvazquezfelipe nodifferencesinlevelsofcirculatingprogenitorendothelialcellsorcirculatingendothelialcellsamongpatientstreatedwithticagrelorcomparedwithclopidogrelduringnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT depradoarmandoperez nodifferencesinlevelsofcirculatingprogenitorendothelialcellsorcirculatingendothelialcellsamongpatientstreatedwithticagrelorcomparedwithclopidogrelduringnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction