Cargando…

Photodynamic therapy and photothermal therapy for the treatment of peritoneal metastasis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: The aim of this review was to analyze preclinical studies and clinical trials evaluating photodynamic therapy (PDT), and photothermal therapy (PTT) in peritoneal metastasis (PM) treatment. CONTENT: Systematic review according PRISMA guidelines. Electronic searches using PubMed and Clinic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pinto, Amandine, Pocard, Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30911668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/pp-2018-0124
_version_ 1783400987494449152
author Pinto, Amandine
Pocard, Marc
author_facet Pinto, Amandine
Pocard, Marc
author_sort Pinto, Amandine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this review was to analyze preclinical studies and clinical trials evaluating photodynamic therapy (PDT), and photothermal therapy (PTT) in peritoneal metastasis (PM) treatment. CONTENT: Systematic review according PRISMA guidelines. Electronic searches using PubMed and Clinical Trials. SUMMARY: A total of 19 preclinical studies analyzing PDT in PM treatment were included. Each new generations of photosensitizers (PS) permitted to improve tumoral targeting. Phase III preclinical studies showed an important tumoral biodistribution (ratio 9.6 vs normal tissue) and significant survival advantage (35.5 vs 52.5 days for cytoreductive surgery vs cytoreductive surgery+PDT, p<0.005). Height clinical trials showed important side effects (capillary leak syndrome and bowel perforation), mainly explained by low tumor-selectivity of the PS used (first generation mainly). Peritoneal mesothelioma apparition with carbon nanotubes first limited the development of PTT. But gold nanoparticles, with a good tolerance, permitted a limitation of tumoral growth (reduction of bioluminescence to 37 % 20 days after PTT), and survival benefit (35, 32, and 26 days for PTT with cisplatine, PTT alone and laser alone, respectively). OUTLOOK: Recent improvement in tumor-selectivity and light delivery systems is promising but further development would be necessary before PDT and PTT routinely applied for peritoneal carcinomatosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6404999
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher De Gruyter
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64049992019-03-25 Photodynamic therapy and photothermal therapy for the treatment of peritoneal metastasis: a systematic review Pinto, Amandine Pocard, Marc Pleura Peritoneum Review BACKGROUND: The aim of this review was to analyze preclinical studies and clinical trials evaluating photodynamic therapy (PDT), and photothermal therapy (PTT) in peritoneal metastasis (PM) treatment. CONTENT: Systematic review according PRISMA guidelines. Electronic searches using PubMed and Clinical Trials. SUMMARY: A total of 19 preclinical studies analyzing PDT in PM treatment were included. Each new generations of photosensitizers (PS) permitted to improve tumoral targeting. Phase III preclinical studies showed an important tumoral biodistribution (ratio 9.6 vs normal tissue) and significant survival advantage (35.5 vs 52.5 days for cytoreductive surgery vs cytoreductive surgery+PDT, p<0.005). Height clinical trials showed important side effects (capillary leak syndrome and bowel perforation), mainly explained by low tumor-selectivity of the PS used (first generation mainly). Peritoneal mesothelioma apparition with carbon nanotubes first limited the development of PTT. But gold nanoparticles, with a good tolerance, permitted a limitation of tumoral growth (reduction of bioluminescence to 37 % 20 days after PTT), and survival benefit (35, 32, and 26 days for PTT with cisplatine, PTT alone and laser alone, respectively). OUTLOOK: Recent improvement in tumor-selectivity and light delivery systems is promising but further development would be necessary before PDT and PTT routinely applied for peritoneal carcinomatosis. De Gruyter 2018-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6404999/ /pubmed/30911668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/pp-2018-0124 Text en © 2018 Pinto and Pocard, published by De Gruyter http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Review
Pinto, Amandine
Pocard, Marc
Photodynamic therapy and photothermal therapy for the treatment of peritoneal metastasis: a systematic review
title Photodynamic therapy and photothermal therapy for the treatment of peritoneal metastasis: a systematic review
title_full Photodynamic therapy and photothermal therapy for the treatment of peritoneal metastasis: a systematic review
title_fullStr Photodynamic therapy and photothermal therapy for the treatment of peritoneal metastasis: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Photodynamic therapy and photothermal therapy for the treatment of peritoneal metastasis: a systematic review
title_short Photodynamic therapy and photothermal therapy for the treatment of peritoneal metastasis: a systematic review
title_sort photodynamic therapy and photothermal therapy for the treatment of peritoneal metastasis: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30911668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/pp-2018-0124
work_keys_str_mv AT pintoamandine photodynamictherapyandphotothermaltherapyforthetreatmentofperitonealmetastasisasystematicreview
AT pocardmarc photodynamictherapyandphotothermaltherapyforthetreatmentofperitonealmetastasisasystematicreview