Cargando…
Different strength declines in leg primary movers versus stabilizers across age—Implications for the risk of falls in older adults?
This study investigated differences in the declines of isometric strength in hip abductors and adductors versus knee extensors across four different age groups (n = 31: 11.2 ± 1.0 y, n = 30: 23.1 ± 2.7 y, n = 27: 48.9 ± 4.4 y, and n = 33: 70.1 ± 4.2 y) with a total of 121 female subjects. As a start...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6405087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30845168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213361 |
_version_ | 1783401009498816512 |
---|---|
author | Daun, Franziska Kibele, Armin |
author_facet | Daun, Franziska Kibele, Armin |
author_sort | Daun, Franziska |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study investigated differences in the declines of isometric strength in hip abductors and adductors versus knee extensors across four different age groups (n = 31: 11.2 ± 1.0 y, n = 30: 23.1 ± 2.7 y, n = 27: 48.9 ± 4.4 y, and n = 33: 70.1 ± 4.2 y) with a total of 121 female subjects. As a starting point, we assumed that, during their daily activities, elderly people would use their leg stabilizers less frequently than their leg primary movers as compared to younger people. Given that muscle strength decreases in the course of the aging process, we hypothesized that larger strength declines in hip abductors and hip adductors as compared to knee extensors would be detected across age. Maximal isometric force for these muscle groups was assessed with a digital hand-held dynamometer. Measurements were taken at 75% of the thigh or shank length and expressed relative to body weight and lever arm length. Intratester reliability of the normalized maximal torques was estimated by using Cronbach’s alpha and calculated to be larger than 0.95. The obtained results indicate a clearly more pronounced strength decline in hip abductors and hip adductors across age than in the knee extensors. Therefore, a particular need for strength training of the lower extremity stabilizer muscles during the aging process is implied. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6405087 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64050872019-03-17 Different strength declines in leg primary movers versus stabilizers across age—Implications for the risk of falls in older adults? Daun, Franziska Kibele, Armin PLoS One Research Article This study investigated differences in the declines of isometric strength in hip abductors and adductors versus knee extensors across four different age groups (n = 31: 11.2 ± 1.0 y, n = 30: 23.1 ± 2.7 y, n = 27: 48.9 ± 4.4 y, and n = 33: 70.1 ± 4.2 y) with a total of 121 female subjects. As a starting point, we assumed that, during their daily activities, elderly people would use their leg stabilizers less frequently than their leg primary movers as compared to younger people. Given that muscle strength decreases in the course of the aging process, we hypothesized that larger strength declines in hip abductors and hip adductors as compared to knee extensors would be detected across age. Maximal isometric force for these muscle groups was assessed with a digital hand-held dynamometer. Measurements were taken at 75% of the thigh or shank length and expressed relative to body weight and lever arm length. Intratester reliability of the normalized maximal torques was estimated by using Cronbach’s alpha and calculated to be larger than 0.95. The obtained results indicate a clearly more pronounced strength decline in hip abductors and hip adductors across age than in the knee extensors. Therefore, a particular need for strength training of the lower extremity stabilizer muscles during the aging process is implied. Public Library of Science 2019-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6405087/ /pubmed/30845168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213361 Text en © 2019 Daun, Kibele http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Daun, Franziska Kibele, Armin Different strength declines in leg primary movers versus stabilizers across age—Implications for the risk of falls in older adults? |
title | Different strength declines in leg primary movers versus stabilizers across age—Implications for the risk of falls in older adults? |
title_full | Different strength declines in leg primary movers versus stabilizers across age—Implications for the risk of falls in older adults? |
title_fullStr | Different strength declines in leg primary movers versus stabilizers across age—Implications for the risk of falls in older adults? |
title_full_unstemmed | Different strength declines in leg primary movers versus stabilizers across age—Implications for the risk of falls in older adults? |
title_short | Different strength declines in leg primary movers versus stabilizers across age—Implications for the risk of falls in older adults? |
title_sort | different strength declines in leg primary movers versus stabilizers across age—implications for the risk of falls in older adults? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6405087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30845168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213361 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daunfranziska differentstrengthdeclinesinlegprimarymoversversusstabilizersacrossageimplicationsfortheriskoffallsinolderadults AT kibelearmin differentstrengthdeclinesinlegprimarymoversversusstabilizersacrossageimplicationsfortheriskoffallsinolderadults |