Cargando…

Different strength declines in leg primary movers versus stabilizers across age—Implications for the risk of falls in older adults?

This study investigated differences in the declines of isometric strength in hip abductors and adductors versus knee extensors across four different age groups (n = 31: 11.2 ± 1.0 y, n = 30: 23.1 ± 2.7 y, n = 27: 48.9 ± 4.4 y, and n = 33: 70.1 ± 4.2 y) with a total of 121 female subjects. As a start...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daun, Franziska, Kibele, Armin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6405087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30845168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213361
_version_ 1783401009498816512
author Daun, Franziska
Kibele, Armin
author_facet Daun, Franziska
Kibele, Armin
author_sort Daun, Franziska
collection PubMed
description This study investigated differences in the declines of isometric strength in hip abductors and adductors versus knee extensors across four different age groups (n = 31: 11.2 ± 1.0 y, n = 30: 23.1 ± 2.7 y, n = 27: 48.9 ± 4.4 y, and n = 33: 70.1 ± 4.2 y) with a total of 121 female subjects. As a starting point, we assumed that, during their daily activities, elderly people would use their leg stabilizers less frequently than their leg primary movers as compared to younger people. Given that muscle strength decreases in the course of the aging process, we hypothesized that larger strength declines in hip abductors and hip adductors as compared to knee extensors would be detected across age. Maximal isometric force for these muscle groups was assessed with a digital hand-held dynamometer. Measurements were taken at 75% of the thigh or shank length and expressed relative to body weight and lever arm length. Intratester reliability of the normalized maximal torques was estimated by using Cronbach’s alpha and calculated to be larger than 0.95. The obtained results indicate a clearly more pronounced strength decline in hip abductors and hip adductors across age than in the knee extensors. Therefore, a particular need for strength training of the lower extremity stabilizer muscles during the aging process is implied.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6405087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64050872019-03-17 Different strength declines in leg primary movers versus stabilizers across age—Implications for the risk of falls in older adults? Daun, Franziska Kibele, Armin PLoS One Research Article This study investigated differences in the declines of isometric strength in hip abductors and adductors versus knee extensors across four different age groups (n = 31: 11.2 ± 1.0 y, n = 30: 23.1 ± 2.7 y, n = 27: 48.9 ± 4.4 y, and n = 33: 70.1 ± 4.2 y) with a total of 121 female subjects. As a starting point, we assumed that, during their daily activities, elderly people would use their leg stabilizers less frequently than their leg primary movers as compared to younger people. Given that muscle strength decreases in the course of the aging process, we hypothesized that larger strength declines in hip abductors and hip adductors as compared to knee extensors would be detected across age. Maximal isometric force for these muscle groups was assessed with a digital hand-held dynamometer. Measurements were taken at 75% of the thigh or shank length and expressed relative to body weight and lever arm length. Intratester reliability of the normalized maximal torques was estimated by using Cronbach’s alpha and calculated to be larger than 0.95. The obtained results indicate a clearly more pronounced strength decline in hip abductors and hip adductors across age than in the knee extensors. Therefore, a particular need for strength training of the lower extremity stabilizer muscles during the aging process is implied. Public Library of Science 2019-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6405087/ /pubmed/30845168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213361 Text en © 2019 Daun, Kibele http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Daun, Franziska
Kibele, Armin
Different strength declines in leg primary movers versus stabilizers across age—Implications for the risk of falls in older adults?
title Different strength declines in leg primary movers versus stabilizers across age—Implications for the risk of falls in older adults?
title_full Different strength declines in leg primary movers versus stabilizers across age—Implications for the risk of falls in older adults?
title_fullStr Different strength declines in leg primary movers versus stabilizers across age—Implications for the risk of falls in older adults?
title_full_unstemmed Different strength declines in leg primary movers versus stabilizers across age—Implications for the risk of falls in older adults?
title_short Different strength declines in leg primary movers versus stabilizers across age—Implications for the risk of falls in older adults?
title_sort different strength declines in leg primary movers versus stabilizers across age—implications for the risk of falls in older adults?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6405087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30845168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213361
work_keys_str_mv AT daunfranziska differentstrengthdeclinesinlegprimarymoversversusstabilizersacrossageimplicationsfortheriskoffallsinolderadults
AT kibelearmin differentstrengthdeclinesinlegprimarymoversversusstabilizersacrossageimplicationsfortheriskoffallsinolderadults