Cargando…

Reliability and validity of transfer assessment instrument version 3.0 in individuals with acute spinal cord injury in early rehabilitation phase

BACKGROUND: Transfers are very important in functional activities of subjects with spinal cord injury (SCI). The transfer assessment instrument (TAI) was the first tool to standardize the assessment of transfer technique. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to establish the reliability and vali...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baghel, Preeti, Walia, Shefali, Noohu, Majumi M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6405354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30930583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1013702518500099
_version_ 1783401056444612608
author Baghel, Preeti
Walia, Shefali
Noohu, Majumi M
author_facet Baghel, Preeti
Walia, Shefali
Noohu, Majumi M
author_sort Baghel, Preeti
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transfers are very important in functional activities of subjects with spinal cord injury (SCI). The transfer assessment instrument (TAI) was the first tool to standardize the assessment of transfer technique. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to establish the reliability and validity of TAI 3.0 in people with SCI in early rehabilitation phase. METHODS: Thirty subjects with acute traumatic SCI were recruited from a tertiary care center for SCI management. Four raters assessed the quality of transfer using TAI 3.0 and a fifth rater used global assessment of transfer scale (VAS). TAI 3.0’s intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for intrarater and interrater reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC), limits of agreement and concurrent validity was determined. RESULTS: The intrarater ICC was 0.93 to 0.98 and interrater ICC was 0.99, indicating high levels of reliability. The SEMs among the raters for TAI 3.0 total was from 0.23 to 0.28. The MDC among the raters TAI 3.0 total was from 0.54 to 0.86. Correlation for different raters between the TAI 3.0 and VAS ranged between 0.88 and 0.90. CONCLUSION: TAI 3.0 is a reliable and valid tool to assess the transfer skill in individuals with SCI in early rehabilitation phase.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6405354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64053542019-03-29 Reliability and validity of transfer assessment instrument version 3.0 in individuals with acute spinal cord injury in early rehabilitation phase Baghel, Preeti Walia, Shefali Noohu, Majumi M Hong Kong Physiother J Research Paper BACKGROUND: Transfers are very important in functional activities of subjects with spinal cord injury (SCI). The transfer assessment instrument (TAI) was the first tool to standardize the assessment of transfer technique. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to establish the reliability and validity of TAI 3.0 in people with SCI in early rehabilitation phase. METHODS: Thirty subjects with acute traumatic SCI were recruited from a tertiary care center for SCI management. Four raters assessed the quality of transfer using TAI 3.0 and a fifth rater used global assessment of transfer scale (VAS). TAI 3.0’s intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for intrarater and interrater reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC), limits of agreement and concurrent validity was determined. RESULTS: The intrarater ICC was 0.93 to 0.98 and interrater ICC was 0.99, indicating high levels of reliability. The SEMs among the raters for TAI 3.0 total was from 0.23 to 0.28. The MDC among the raters TAI 3.0 total was from 0.54 to 0.86. Correlation for different raters between the TAI 3.0 and VAS ranged between 0.88 and 0.90. CONCLUSION: TAI 3.0 is a reliable and valid tool to assess the transfer skill in individuals with SCI in early rehabilitation phase. World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd 2018-12 2018-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6405354/ /pubmed/30930583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1013702518500099 Text en © 2018, Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Baghel, Preeti
Walia, Shefali
Noohu, Majumi M
Reliability and validity of transfer assessment instrument version 3.0 in individuals with acute spinal cord injury in early rehabilitation phase
title Reliability and validity of transfer assessment instrument version 3.0 in individuals with acute spinal cord injury in early rehabilitation phase
title_full Reliability and validity of transfer assessment instrument version 3.0 in individuals with acute spinal cord injury in early rehabilitation phase
title_fullStr Reliability and validity of transfer assessment instrument version 3.0 in individuals with acute spinal cord injury in early rehabilitation phase
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and validity of transfer assessment instrument version 3.0 in individuals with acute spinal cord injury in early rehabilitation phase
title_short Reliability and validity of transfer assessment instrument version 3.0 in individuals with acute spinal cord injury in early rehabilitation phase
title_sort reliability and validity of transfer assessment instrument version 3.0 in individuals with acute spinal cord injury in early rehabilitation phase
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6405354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30930583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1013702518500099
work_keys_str_mv AT baghelpreeti reliabilityandvalidityoftransferassessmentinstrumentversion30inindividualswithacutespinalcordinjuryinearlyrehabilitationphase
AT waliashefali reliabilityandvalidityoftransferassessmentinstrumentversion30inindividualswithacutespinalcordinjuryinearlyrehabilitationphase
AT noohumajumim reliabilityandvalidityoftransferassessmentinstrumentversion30inindividualswithacutespinalcordinjuryinearlyrehabilitationphase