Cargando…

Repetitive Passive Movement Modulates Corticospinal Excitability: Effect of Movement and Rest Cycles and Subject Attention

Repetitive passive movement (PM) affects corticospinal excitability; however, it is unknown whether a duty cycle which repeats movement and rest, or subjects’ conscious attention to movements, affects corticospinal excitability. We aimed to clarify the effect of the presence or absence of a duty cyc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsuiki, Shota, Sasaki, Ryoki, Pham, Manh Van, Miyaguchi, Shota, Kojima, Sho, Saito, Kei, Inukai, Yasuto, Otsuru, Naofumi, Onishi, Hideaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6405431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881295
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00038
_version_ 1783401067260674048
author Tsuiki, Shota
Sasaki, Ryoki
Pham, Manh Van
Miyaguchi, Shota
Kojima, Sho
Saito, Kei
Inukai, Yasuto
Otsuru, Naofumi
Onishi, Hideaki
author_facet Tsuiki, Shota
Sasaki, Ryoki
Pham, Manh Van
Miyaguchi, Shota
Kojima, Sho
Saito, Kei
Inukai, Yasuto
Otsuru, Naofumi
Onishi, Hideaki
author_sort Tsuiki, Shota
collection PubMed
description Repetitive passive movement (PM) affects corticospinal excitability; however, it is unknown whether a duty cycle which repeats movement and rest, or subjects’ conscious attention to movements, affects corticospinal excitability. We aimed to clarify the effect of the presence or absence of a duty cycle and subjects’ attention on corticospinal excitability. Three experiments were conducted. In Experiment 1, PM of the right index finger was performed for 10 min. Three conditions were used: (1) continuous PM (cPM) at a rate of 40°/s; (2) intermittent PM (iPM) with a duty cycle at 40°/s; and (3) iPM at 100°/s. In conditions 1 and 3, motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude was significantly reduced. In Experiment 2, PM was performed for 30 min: condition 1 comprised cPM at a rate of 40°/s and Condition 2 comprised iPM at 40°/s. MEP amplitude significantly decreased in both conditions. In Experiment 3, PM was performed for 10 min: condition 1 comprised paying attention to the moving finger during iPM and Condition 2 was similar to Condition 1 but while counting images on a monitor without looking at the movement finger, and Condition 3 comprised counting images on a monitor without performing PM. MEP amplitude significantly increased only under Condition 1. Thus, afferent input from movements above a certain threshold may affect corticospinal excitability reduction. Furthermore, corticospinal excitability increases when paying attention to passive finger movement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6405431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64054312019-03-15 Repetitive Passive Movement Modulates Corticospinal Excitability: Effect of Movement and Rest Cycles and Subject Attention Tsuiki, Shota Sasaki, Ryoki Pham, Manh Van Miyaguchi, Shota Kojima, Sho Saito, Kei Inukai, Yasuto Otsuru, Naofumi Onishi, Hideaki Front Behav Neurosci Neuroscience Repetitive passive movement (PM) affects corticospinal excitability; however, it is unknown whether a duty cycle which repeats movement and rest, or subjects’ conscious attention to movements, affects corticospinal excitability. We aimed to clarify the effect of the presence or absence of a duty cycle and subjects’ attention on corticospinal excitability. Three experiments were conducted. In Experiment 1, PM of the right index finger was performed for 10 min. Three conditions were used: (1) continuous PM (cPM) at a rate of 40°/s; (2) intermittent PM (iPM) with a duty cycle at 40°/s; and (3) iPM at 100°/s. In conditions 1 and 3, motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude was significantly reduced. In Experiment 2, PM was performed for 30 min: condition 1 comprised cPM at a rate of 40°/s and Condition 2 comprised iPM at 40°/s. MEP amplitude significantly decreased in both conditions. In Experiment 3, PM was performed for 10 min: condition 1 comprised paying attention to the moving finger during iPM and Condition 2 was similar to Condition 1 but while counting images on a monitor without looking at the movement finger, and Condition 3 comprised counting images on a monitor without performing PM. MEP amplitude significantly increased only under Condition 1. Thus, afferent input from movements above a certain threshold may affect corticospinal excitability reduction. Furthermore, corticospinal excitability increases when paying attention to passive finger movement. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6405431/ /pubmed/30881295 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00038 Text en Copyright © 2019 Tsuiki, Sasaki, Pham, Miyaguchi, Kojima, Saito, Inukai, Otsuru and Onishi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Tsuiki, Shota
Sasaki, Ryoki
Pham, Manh Van
Miyaguchi, Shota
Kojima, Sho
Saito, Kei
Inukai, Yasuto
Otsuru, Naofumi
Onishi, Hideaki
Repetitive Passive Movement Modulates Corticospinal Excitability: Effect of Movement and Rest Cycles and Subject Attention
title Repetitive Passive Movement Modulates Corticospinal Excitability: Effect of Movement and Rest Cycles and Subject Attention
title_full Repetitive Passive Movement Modulates Corticospinal Excitability: Effect of Movement and Rest Cycles and Subject Attention
title_fullStr Repetitive Passive Movement Modulates Corticospinal Excitability: Effect of Movement and Rest Cycles and Subject Attention
title_full_unstemmed Repetitive Passive Movement Modulates Corticospinal Excitability: Effect of Movement and Rest Cycles and Subject Attention
title_short Repetitive Passive Movement Modulates Corticospinal Excitability: Effect of Movement and Rest Cycles and Subject Attention
title_sort repetitive passive movement modulates corticospinal excitability: effect of movement and rest cycles and subject attention
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6405431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881295
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00038
work_keys_str_mv AT tsuikishota repetitivepassivemovementmodulatescorticospinalexcitabilityeffectofmovementandrestcyclesandsubjectattention
AT sasakiryoki repetitivepassivemovementmodulatescorticospinalexcitabilityeffectofmovementandrestcyclesandsubjectattention
AT phammanhvan repetitivepassivemovementmodulatescorticospinalexcitabilityeffectofmovementandrestcyclesandsubjectattention
AT miyaguchishota repetitivepassivemovementmodulatescorticospinalexcitabilityeffectofmovementandrestcyclesandsubjectattention
AT kojimasho repetitivepassivemovementmodulatescorticospinalexcitabilityeffectofmovementandrestcyclesandsubjectattention
AT saitokei repetitivepassivemovementmodulatescorticospinalexcitabilityeffectofmovementandrestcyclesandsubjectattention
AT inukaiyasuto repetitivepassivemovementmodulatescorticospinalexcitabilityeffectofmovementandrestcyclesandsubjectattention
AT otsurunaofumi repetitivepassivemovementmodulatescorticospinalexcitabilityeffectofmovementandrestcyclesandsubjectattention
AT onishihideaki repetitivepassivemovementmodulatescorticospinalexcitabilityeffectofmovementandrestcyclesandsubjectattention