Cargando…

Characterization of the Mechanism and Substrate of Atrial Tachycardia Using Ultra‐High‐Density Mapping in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: Impact on Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND: Atrial tachycardia (AT) is common in patients with adult congenital heart disease and is challenging to map and ablate. We used ultra‐high‐density mapping to characterize the AT mechanism and investigate whether substrate characteristics are related to ablation outcomes. METHODS AND RESU...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mantziari, Lilian, Butcher, Charles, Shi, Rui, Kontogeorgis, Andrianos, Opel, Aaisha, Chen, Zhong, Haldar, Shouvik, Panikker, Sandeep, Hussain, Wajid, Jones, David Gareth, Gatzoulis, Michael A., Markides, Vias, Ernst, Sabine, Wong, Tom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6405650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30773973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.010535
_version_ 1783401124205690880
author Mantziari, Lilian
Butcher, Charles
Shi, Rui
Kontogeorgis, Andrianos
Opel, Aaisha
Chen, Zhong
Haldar, Shouvik
Panikker, Sandeep
Hussain, Wajid
Jones, David Gareth
Gatzoulis, Michael A.
Markides, Vias
Ernst, Sabine
Wong, Tom
author_facet Mantziari, Lilian
Butcher, Charles
Shi, Rui
Kontogeorgis, Andrianos
Opel, Aaisha
Chen, Zhong
Haldar, Shouvik
Panikker, Sandeep
Hussain, Wajid
Jones, David Gareth
Gatzoulis, Michael A.
Markides, Vias
Ernst, Sabine
Wong, Tom
author_sort Mantziari, Lilian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Atrial tachycardia (AT) is common in patients with adult congenital heart disease and is challenging to map and ablate. We used ultra‐high‐density mapping to characterize the AT mechanism and investigate whether substrate characteristics are related to ablation outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 50 ATs were mapped with ultra‐high‐density mapping in 23 procedures. Patients were followed up for up to 12 months. Procedures were classified to group A if there was 1 single AT induced (n=12) and group B if there were ≥2 ATs induced (n=11 procedures). AT mechanism per procedure was macro re‐entry (n=10) and localized re‐entry (n=2) in group A and multiple focal (n=6) or multiple macro re‐entry (n=5) in group B. Procedure duration, low voltage area (0.05–0.5 mV), and low voltage area indexed for volume were higher in group B (159 [147–180] versus 412 [352–420] minutes, P<0.001, 22.6 [12.2–29.8] versus 54.2 [51.1–61.6] cm(2), P=0.014 and 0.17 [0.12–0.21] versus 0.26 [0.23–0.27] cm(2)/mL, P=0.024 accordingly). Dense scar (<0.05 mV) and atrial volume were similar between groups. Acute success and freedom from arrhythmia recurrence were worse in group B (100% versus 77% P=0.009 and 11.3, CI 9.8–12.7 versus 4.9, CI 2.2–7.6 months, log rank P=0.004). Indexed low voltage area ≥0.24 cm(2)/mL could predict recurrence with 100% sensitivity and 77% specificity (area under the curve 0.923, P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Larger low voltage area but not dense scar is associated with the induction of multiple focal or re‐entry ATs, which are subsequently associated with longer procedure duration and worse acute and midterm clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6405650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64056502019-03-19 Characterization of the Mechanism and Substrate of Atrial Tachycardia Using Ultra‐High‐Density Mapping in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: Impact on Clinical Outcomes Mantziari, Lilian Butcher, Charles Shi, Rui Kontogeorgis, Andrianos Opel, Aaisha Chen, Zhong Haldar, Shouvik Panikker, Sandeep Hussain, Wajid Jones, David Gareth Gatzoulis, Michael A. Markides, Vias Ernst, Sabine Wong, Tom J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Atrial tachycardia (AT) is common in patients with adult congenital heart disease and is challenging to map and ablate. We used ultra‐high‐density mapping to characterize the AT mechanism and investigate whether substrate characteristics are related to ablation outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 50 ATs were mapped with ultra‐high‐density mapping in 23 procedures. Patients were followed up for up to 12 months. Procedures were classified to group A if there was 1 single AT induced (n=12) and group B if there were ≥2 ATs induced (n=11 procedures). AT mechanism per procedure was macro re‐entry (n=10) and localized re‐entry (n=2) in group A and multiple focal (n=6) or multiple macro re‐entry (n=5) in group B. Procedure duration, low voltage area (0.05–0.5 mV), and low voltage area indexed for volume were higher in group B (159 [147–180] versus 412 [352–420] minutes, P<0.001, 22.6 [12.2–29.8] versus 54.2 [51.1–61.6] cm(2), P=0.014 and 0.17 [0.12–0.21] versus 0.26 [0.23–0.27] cm(2)/mL, P=0.024 accordingly). Dense scar (<0.05 mV) and atrial volume were similar between groups. Acute success and freedom from arrhythmia recurrence were worse in group B (100% versus 77% P=0.009 and 11.3, CI 9.8–12.7 versus 4.9, CI 2.2–7.6 months, log rank P=0.004). Indexed low voltage area ≥0.24 cm(2)/mL could predict recurrence with 100% sensitivity and 77% specificity (area under the curve 0.923, P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Larger low voltage area but not dense scar is associated with the induction of multiple focal or re‐entry ATs, which are subsequently associated with longer procedure duration and worse acute and midterm clinical outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6405650/ /pubmed/30773973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.010535 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Mantziari, Lilian
Butcher, Charles
Shi, Rui
Kontogeorgis, Andrianos
Opel, Aaisha
Chen, Zhong
Haldar, Shouvik
Panikker, Sandeep
Hussain, Wajid
Jones, David Gareth
Gatzoulis, Michael A.
Markides, Vias
Ernst, Sabine
Wong, Tom
Characterization of the Mechanism and Substrate of Atrial Tachycardia Using Ultra‐High‐Density Mapping in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: Impact on Clinical Outcomes
title Characterization of the Mechanism and Substrate of Atrial Tachycardia Using Ultra‐High‐Density Mapping in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: Impact on Clinical Outcomes
title_full Characterization of the Mechanism and Substrate of Atrial Tachycardia Using Ultra‐High‐Density Mapping in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: Impact on Clinical Outcomes
title_fullStr Characterization of the Mechanism and Substrate of Atrial Tachycardia Using Ultra‐High‐Density Mapping in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: Impact on Clinical Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Characterization of the Mechanism and Substrate of Atrial Tachycardia Using Ultra‐High‐Density Mapping in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: Impact on Clinical Outcomes
title_short Characterization of the Mechanism and Substrate of Atrial Tachycardia Using Ultra‐High‐Density Mapping in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: Impact on Clinical Outcomes
title_sort characterization of the mechanism and substrate of atrial tachycardia using ultra‐high‐density mapping in adults with congenital heart disease: impact on clinical outcomes
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6405650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30773973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.010535
work_keys_str_mv AT mantziarililian characterizationofthemechanismandsubstrateofatrialtachycardiausingultrahighdensitymappinginadultswithcongenitalheartdiseaseimpactonclinicaloutcomes
AT butchercharles characterizationofthemechanismandsubstrateofatrialtachycardiausingultrahighdensitymappinginadultswithcongenitalheartdiseaseimpactonclinicaloutcomes
AT shirui characterizationofthemechanismandsubstrateofatrialtachycardiausingultrahighdensitymappinginadultswithcongenitalheartdiseaseimpactonclinicaloutcomes
AT kontogeorgisandrianos characterizationofthemechanismandsubstrateofatrialtachycardiausingultrahighdensitymappinginadultswithcongenitalheartdiseaseimpactonclinicaloutcomes
AT opelaaisha characterizationofthemechanismandsubstrateofatrialtachycardiausingultrahighdensitymappinginadultswithcongenitalheartdiseaseimpactonclinicaloutcomes
AT chenzhong characterizationofthemechanismandsubstrateofatrialtachycardiausingultrahighdensitymappinginadultswithcongenitalheartdiseaseimpactonclinicaloutcomes
AT haldarshouvik characterizationofthemechanismandsubstrateofatrialtachycardiausingultrahighdensitymappinginadultswithcongenitalheartdiseaseimpactonclinicaloutcomes
AT panikkersandeep characterizationofthemechanismandsubstrateofatrialtachycardiausingultrahighdensitymappinginadultswithcongenitalheartdiseaseimpactonclinicaloutcomes
AT hussainwajid characterizationofthemechanismandsubstrateofatrialtachycardiausingultrahighdensitymappinginadultswithcongenitalheartdiseaseimpactonclinicaloutcomes
AT jonesdavidgareth characterizationofthemechanismandsubstrateofatrialtachycardiausingultrahighdensitymappinginadultswithcongenitalheartdiseaseimpactonclinicaloutcomes
AT gatzoulismichaela characterizationofthemechanismandsubstrateofatrialtachycardiausingultrahighdensitymappinginadultswithcongenitalheartdiseaseimpactonclinicaloutcomes
AT markidesvias characterizationofthemechanismandsubstrateofatrialtachycardiausingultrahighdensitymappinginadultswithcongenitalheartdiseaseimpactonclinicaloutcomes
AT ernstsabine characterizationofthemechanismandsubstrateofatrialtachycardiausingultrahighdensitymappinginadultswithcongenitalheartdiseaseimpactonclinicaloutcomes
AT wongtom characterizationofthemechanismandsubstrateofatrialtachycardiausingultrahighdensitymappinginadultswithcongenitalheartdiseaseimpactonclinicaloutcomes