Cargando…

Improving Care of STEMI in the United States 2008 to 2012: A Report From the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline Program

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the change in treatment strategies and times to treatment over the first 5 years of the Mission: Lifeline program. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed pre‐ and in‐hospital care and outcomes from 2008 to 2012 for patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Granger, Christopher B., Bates, Eric R., Jollis, James G., Antman, Elliott M., Nichol, Graham, O'Connor, Robert E., Gregory, Tammy, Roettig, Mayme L., Peng, S. Andrew, Ellrodt, Gray, Henry, Timothy D., French, William J., Jacobs, Alice K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6405711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30596310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.008096
_version_ 1783401142807429120
author Granger, Christopher B.
Bates, Eric R.
Jollis, James G.
Antman, Elliott M.
Nichol, Graham
O'Connor, Robert E.
Gregory, Tammy
Roettig, Mayme L.
Peng, S. Andrew
Ellrodt, Gray
Henry, Timothy D.
French, William J.
Jacobs, Alice K.
author_facet Granger, Christopher B.
Bates, Eric R.
Jollis, James G.
Antman, Elliott M.
Nichol, Graham
O'Connor, Robert E.
Gregory, Tammy
Roettig, Mayme L.
Peng, S. Andrew
Ellrodt, Gray
Henry, Timothy D.
French, William J.
Jacobs, Alice K.
author_sort Granger, Christopher B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the change in treatment strategies and times to treatment over the first 5 years of the Mission: Lifeline program. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed pre‐ and in‐hospital care and outcomes from 2008 to 2012 for patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction at US hospitals, using data from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry—Get With The Guidelines Registry. In‐hospital adjusted mortality was calculated including and excluding cardiac arrest as a reason for primary percutaneous coronary intervention delay. A total of 147 466 patients from 485 hospitals were analyzed. There was a decrease in the proportion of eligible patients not treated with reperfusion (6.2% versus 3.3%) and treated with fibrinolytic therapy (13.4% versus 7.0%). Median time from symptom onset to first medical contact was unchanged (≈50 minutes). Use of prehospital ECGs increased (45% versus 71%). All major reperfusion times improved: median first medical contact‐to‐device for emergency medical systems transport to percutaneous coronary intervention–capable hospitals (93 to 84 minutes), first door‐to‐device for transfers for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (130 to 112 minutes), and door‐in–door‐out at non–percutaneous coronary intervention–capable hospitals (76 to 62 minutes) (all P<0.001 over 5 years). Rates of cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest, and overall in‐hospital mortality increased (5.7% to 6.3%). Adjusted mortality excluding patients with known cardiac arrest decreased by 14% at 3 years and 25% at 5 years (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Quality of care for patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction improved over time in Mission: Lifeline, including increased use of reperfusion therapy and faster times‐to‐treatment. In‐hospital mortality improved for patients without cardiac arrest but did not appear to improve overall as the number of these high‐risk patients increased.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6405711
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64057112019-03-21 Improving Care of STEMI in the United States 2008 to 2012: A Report From the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline Program Granger, Christopher B. Bates, Eric R. Jollis, James G. Antman, Elliott M. Nichol, Graham O'Connor, Robert E. Gregory, Tammy Roettig, Mayme L. Peng, S. Andrew Ellrodt, Gray Henry, Timothy D. French, William J. Jacobs, Alice K. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the change in treatment strategies and times to treatment over the first 5 years of the Mission: Lifeline program. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed pre‐ and in‐hospital care and outcomes from 2008 to 2012 for patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction at US hospitals, using data from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry—Get With The Guidelines Registry. In‐hospital adjusted mortality was calculated including and excluding cardiac arrest as a reason for primary percutaneous coronary intervention delay. A total of 147 466 patients from 485 hospitals were analyzed. There was a decrease in the proportion of eligible patients not treated with reperfusion (6.2% versus 3.3%) and treated with fibrinolytic therapy (13.4% versus 7.0%). Median time from symptom onset to first medical contact was unchanged (≈50 minutes). Use of prehospital ECGs increased (45% versus 71%). All major reperfusion times improved: median first medical contact‐to‐device for emergency medical systems transport to percutaneous coronary intervention–capable hospitals (93 to 84 minutes), first door‐to‐device for transfers for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (130 to 112 minutes), and door‐in–door‐out at non–percutaneous coronary intervention–capable hospitals (76 to 62 minutes) (all P<0.001 over 5 years). Rates of cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest, and overall in‐hospital mortality increased (5.7% to 6.3%). Adjusted mortality excluding patients with known cardiac arrest decreased by 14% at 3 years and 25% at 5 years (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Quality of care for patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction improved over time in Mission: Lifeline, including increased use of reperfusion therapy and faster times‐to‐treatment. In‐hospital mortality improved for patients without cardiac arrest but did not appear to improve overall as the number of these high‐risk patients increased. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6405711/ /pubmed/30596310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.008096 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Granger, Christopher B.
Bates, Eric R.
Jollis, James G.
Antman, Elliott M.
Nichol, Graham
O'Connor, Robert E.
Gregory, Tammy
Roettig, Mayme L.
Peng, S. Andrew
Ellrodt, Gray
Henry, Timothy D.
French, William J.
Jacobs, Alice K.
Improving Care of STEMI in the United States 2008 to 2012: A Report From the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline Program
title Improving Care of STEMI in the United States 2008 to 2012: A Report From the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline Program
title_full Improving Care of STEMI in the United States 2008 to 2012: A Report From the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline Program
title_fullStr Improving Care of STEMI in the United States 2008 to 2012: A Report From the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline Program
title_full_unstemmed Improving Care of STEMI in the United States 2008 to 2012: A Report From the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline Program
title_short Improving Care of STEMI in the United States 2008 to 2012: A Report From the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline Program
title_sort improving care of stemi in the united states 2008 to 2012: a report from the american heart association mission: lifeline program
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6405711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30596310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.008096
work_keys_str_mv AT grangerchristopherb improvingcareofstemiintheunitedstates2008to2012areportfromtheamericanheartassociationmissionlifelineprogram
AT batesericr improvingcareofstemiintheunitedstates2008to2012areportfromtheamericanheartassociationmissionlifelineprogram
AT jollisjamesg improvingcareofstemiintheunitedstates2008to2012areportfromtheamericanheartassociationmissionlifelineprogram
AT antmanelliottm improvingcareofstemiintheunitedstates2008to2012areportfromtheamericanheartassociationmissionlifelineprogram
AT nicholgraham improvingcareofstemiintheunitedstates2008to2012areportfromtheamericanheartassociationmissionlifelineprogram
AT oconnorroberte improvingcareofstemiintheunitedstates2008to2012areportfromtheamericanheartassociationmissionlifelineprogram
AT gregorytammy improvingcareofstemiintheunitedstates2008to2012areportfromtheamericanheartassociationmissionlifelineprogram
AT roettigmaymel improvingcareofstemiintheunitedstates2008to2012areportfromtheamericanheartassociationmissionlifelineprogram
AT pengsandrew improvingcareofstemiintheunitedstates2008to2012areportfromtheamericanheartassociationmissionlifelineprogram
AT ellrodtgray improvingcareofstemiintheunitedstates2008to2012areportfromtheamericanheartassociationmissionlifelineprogram
AT henrytimothyd improvingcareofstemiintheunitedstates2008to2012areportfromtheamericanheartassociationmissionlifelineprogram
AT frenchwilliamj improvingcareofstemiintheunitedstates2008to2012areportfromtheamericanheartassociationmissionlifelineprogram
AT jacobsalicek improvingcareofstemiintheunitedstates2008to2012areportfromtheamericanheartassociationmissionlifelineprogram