Cargando…
Improving Care of STEMI in the United States 2008 to 2012: A Report From the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline Program
BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the change in treatment strategies and times to treatment over the first 5 years of the Mission: Lifeline program. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed pre‐ and in‐hospital care and outcomes from 2008 to 2012 for patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6405711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30596310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.008096 |
_version_ | 1783401142807429120 |
---|---|
author | Granger, Christopher B. Bates, Eric R. Jollis, James G. Antman, Elliott M. Nichol, Graham O'Connor, Robert E. Gregory, Tammy Roettig, Mayme L. Peng, S. Andrew Ellrodt, Gray Henry, Timothy D. French, William J. Jacobs, Alice K. |
author_facet | Granger, Christopher B. Bates, Eric R. Jollis, James G. Antman, Elliott M. Nichol, Graham O'Connor, Robert E. Gregory, Tammy Roettig, Mayme L. Peng, S. Andrew Ellrodt, Gray Henry, Timothy D. French, William J. Jacobs, Alice K. |
author_sort | Granger, Christopher B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the change in treatment strategies and times to treatment over the first 5 years of the Mission: Lifeline program. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed pre‐ and in‐hospital care and outcomes from 2008 to 2012 for patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction at US hospitals, using data from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry—Get With The Guidelines Registry. In‐hospital adjusted mortality was calculated including and excluding cardiac arrest as a reason for primary percutaneous coronary intervention delay. A total of 147 466 patients from 485 hospitals were analyzed. There was a decrease in the proportion of eligible patients not treated with reperfusion (6.2% versus 3.3%) and treated with fibrinolytic therapy (13.4% versus 7.0%). Median time from symptom onset to first medical contact was unchanged (≈50 minutes). Use of prehospital ECGs increased (45% versus 71%). All major reperfusion times improved: median first medical contact‐to‐device for emergency medical systems transport to percutaneous coronary intervention–capable hospitals (93 to 84 minutes), first door‐to‐device for transfers for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (130 to 112 minutes), and door‐in–door‐out at non–percutaneous coronary intervention–capable hospitals (76 to 62 minutes) (all P<0.001 over 5 years). Rates of cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest, and overall in‐hospital mortality increased (5.7% to 6.3%). Adjusted mortality excluding patients with known cardiac arrest decreased by 14% at 3 years and 25% at 5 years (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Quality of care for patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction improved over time in Mission: Lifeline, including increased use of reperfusion therapy and faster times‐to‐treatment. In‐hospital mortality improved for patients without cardiac arrest but did not appear to improve overall as the number of these high‐risk patients increased. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6405711 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64057112019-03-21 Improving Care of STEMI in the United States 2008 to 2012: A Report From the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline Program Granger, Christopher B. Bates, Eric R. Jollis, James G. Antman, Elliott M. Nichol, Graham O'Connor, Robert E. Gregory, Tammy Roettig, Mayme L. Peng, S. Andrew Ellrodt, Gray Henry, Timothy D. French, William J. Jacobs, Alice K. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the change in treatment strategies and times to treatment over the first 5 years of the Mission: Lifeline program. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed pre‐ and in‐hospital care and outcomes from 2008 to 2012 for patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction at US hospitals, using data from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry—Get With The Guidelines Registry. In‐hospital adjusted mortality was calculated including and excluding cardiac arrest as a reason for primary percutaneous coronary intervention delay. A total of 147 466 patients from 485 hospitals were analyzed. There was a decrease in the proportion of eligible patients not treated with reperfusion (6.2% versus 3.3%) and treated with fibrinolytic therapy (13.4% versus 7.0%). Median time from symptom onset to first medical contact was unchanged (≈50 minutes). Use of prehospital ECGs increased (45% versus 71%). All major reperfusion times improved: median first medical contact‐to‐device for emergency medical systems transport to percutaneous coronary intervention–capable hospitals (93 to 84 minutes), first door‐to‐device for transfers for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (130 to 112 minutes), and door‐in–door‐out at non–percutaneous coronary intervention–capable hospitals (76 to 62 minutes) (all P<0.001 over 5 years). Rates of cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest, and overall in‐hospital mortality increased (5.7% to 6.3%). Adjusted mortality excluding patients with known cardiac arrest decreased by 14% at 3 years and 25% at 5 years (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Quality of care for patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction improved over time in Mission: Lifeline, including increased use of reperfusion therapy and faster times‐to‐treatment. In‐hospital mortality improved for patients without cardiac arrest but did not appear to improve overall as the number of these high‐risk patients increased. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6405711/ /pubmed/30596310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.008096 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Granger, Christopher B. Bates, Eric R. Jollis, James G. Antman, Elliott M. Nichol, Graham O'Connor, Robert E. Gregory, Tammy Roettig, Mayme L. Peng, S. Andrew Ellrodt, Gray Henry, Timothy D. French, William J. Jacobs, Alice K. Improving Care of STEMI in the United States 2008 to 2012: A Report From the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline Program |
title | Improving Care of STEMI in the United States 2008 to 2012: A Report From the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline Program |
title_full | Improving Care of STEMI in the United States 2008 to 2012: A Report From the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline Program |
title_fullStr | Improving Care of STEMI in the United States 2008 to 2012: A Report From the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline Program |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving Care of STEMI in the United States 2008 to 2012: A Report From the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline Program |
title_short | Improving Care of STEMI in the United States 2008 to 2012: A Report From the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline Program |
title_sort | improving care of stemi in the united states 2008 to 2012: a report from the american heart association mission: lifeline program |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6405711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30596310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.008096 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grangerchristopherb improvingcareofstemiintheunitedstates2008to2012areportfromtheamericanheartassociationmissionlifelineprogram AT batesericr improvingcareofstemiintheunitedstates2008to2012areportfromtheamericanheartassociationmissionlifelineprogram AT jollisjamesg improvingcareofstemiintheunitedstates2008to2012areportfromtheamericanheartassociationmissionlifelineprogram AT antmanelliottm improvingcareofstemiintheunitedstates2008to2012areportfromtheamericanheartassociationmissionlifelineprogram AT nicholgraham improvingcareofstemiintheunitedstates2008to2012areportfromtheamericanheartassociationmissionlifelineprogram AT oconnorroberte improvingcareofstemiintheunitedstates2008to2012areportfromtheamericanheartassociationmissionlifelineprogram AT gregorytammy improvingcareofstemiintheunitedstates2008to2012areportfromtheamericanheartassociationmissionlifelineprogram AT roettigmaymel improvingcareofstemiintheunitedstates2008to2012areportfromtheamericanheartassociationmissionlifelineprogram AT pengsandrew improvingcareofstemiintheunitedstates2008to2012areportfromtheamericanheartassociationmissionlifelineprogram AT ellrodtgray improvingcareofstemiintheunitedstates2008to2012areportfromtheamericanheartassociationmissionlifelineprogram AT henrytimothyd improvingcareofstemiintheunitedstates2008to2012areportfromtheamericanheartassociationmissionlifelineprogram AT frenchwilliamj improvingcareofstemiintheunitedstates2008to2012areportfromtheamericanheartassociationmissionlifelineprogram AT jacobsalicek improvingcareofstemiintheunitedstates2008to2012areportfromtheamericanheartassociationmissionlifelineprogram |