Cargando…
Efficacy of Ablation Lesion Sets in Addition to Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Findings From the SMASH‐AF Meta‐Analysis Study Cohort
BACKGROUND: The objective was to explore the efficacy of ablation lesion sets in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The optimal strategy for catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is debated. METHODS AND RESULTS: The SMASH‐AF (Systematic Revie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6405732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30587059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009976 |
_version_ | 1783401149436526592 |
---|---|
author | Cluckey, Andrew Perino, Alexander C. Yunus, Fahd N. Leef, George C. Askari, Mariam Heidenreich, Paul A. Narayan, Sanjiv M. Wang, Paul J. Turakhia, Mintu P. |
author_facet | Cluckey, Andrew Perino, Alexander C. Yunus, Fahd N. Leef, George C. Askari, Mariam Heidenreich, Paul A. Narayan, Sanjiv M. Wang, Paul J. Turakhia, Mintu P. |
author_sort | Cluckey, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The objective was to explore the efficacy of ablation lesion sets in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The optimal strategy for catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is debated. METHODS AND RESULTS: The SMASH‐AF (Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis of Ablation Strategy Heterogeneity in Atrial Fibrillation) study cohort includes trials and observational studies identified in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases from January 1 1990, to August 1, 2016. We included studies reporting single procedure paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation success rates. Exclusion criteria included insufficient reporting of outcomes, ablation strategies that were not prespecified and uniform, and a sample size of fewer than 40 patients. We analyzed lesion sets performed in addition to PVI (PVI plus) using multivariable random‐effects meta‐regression to control for patient, study, and procedure characteristics. The analysis included 145 total studies with 23 263 patients (PVI‐only cohort: 115 studies, 148 treatment arms, 16 500 patients; PVI plus cohort: 39 studies; 46 treatment arms, 6763 patients). PVI plus studies, as compared with PVI‐only studies, included younger patients (56.7 years versus 58.8 years, P=0.001), fewer women (27.2% versus 32.0% women, P=0.002), and were more methodologically rigorous with longer follow‐up (29.5 versus 17.1 months, P 0.004) and more randomization (19.4% versus 11.8%, P<0.001). In multivariable meta‐regression, PVI plus studies were associated with improved success (7.6% absolute improvement [95% CI, 2.6–12.5%]; P<0.01, I (2)=88%), specifically superior vena cava isolation (4 studies, 4 treatment arms, 1392 patients; 15.1% absolute improvement [95% CI, 2.3–27.9%]; P 0.02, I (2)=87%). However, residual heterogeneity was large. CONCLUSIONS: Across the paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation literature, PVI plus ablation strategies were associated with incremental improvements in success rate. However, large residual heterogeneity complicates evidence synthesis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6405732 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64057322019-03-21 Efficacy of Ablation Lesion Sets in Addition to Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Findings From the SMASH‐AF Meta‐Analysis Study Cohort Cluckey, Andrew Perino, Alexander C. Yunus, Fahd N. Leef, George C. Askari, Mariam Heidenreich, Paul A. Narayan, Sanjiv M. Wang, Paul J. Turakhia, Mintu P. J Am Heart Assoc Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis BACKGROUND: The objective was to explore the efficacy of ablation lesion sets in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The optimal strategy for catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is debated. METHODS AND RESULTS: The SMASH‐AF (Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis of Ablation Strategy Heterogeneity in Atrial Fibrillation) study cohort includes trials and observational studies identified in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases from January 1 1990, to August 1, 2016. We included studies reporting single procedure paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation success rates. Exclusion criteria included insufficient reporting of outcomes, ablation strategies that were not prespecified and uniform, and a sample size of fewer than 40 patients. We analyzed lesion sets performed in addition to PVI (PVI plus) using multivariable random‐effects meta‐regression to control for patient, study, and procedure characteristics. The analysis included 145 total studies with 23 263 patients (PVI‐only cohort: 115 studies, 148 treatment arms, 16 500 patients; PVI plus cohort: 39 studies; 46 treatment arms, 6763 patients). PVI plus studies, as compared with PVI‐only studies, included younger patients (56.7 years versus 58.8 years, P=0.001), fewer women (27.2% versus 32.0% women, P=0.002), and were more methodologically rigorous with longer follow‐up (29.5 versus 17.1 months, P 0.004) and more randomization (19.4% versus 11.8%, P<0.001). In multivariable meta‐regression, PVI plus studies were associated with improved success (7.6% absolute improvement [95% CI, 2.6–12.5%]; P<0.01, I (2)=88%), specifically superior vena cava isolation (4 studies, 4 treatment arms, 1392 patients; 15.1% absolute improvement [95% CI, 2.3–27.9%]; P 0.02, I (2)=87%). However, residual heterogeneity was large. CONCLUSIONS: Across the paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation literature, PVI plus ablation strategies were associated with incremental improvements in success rate. However, large residual heterogeneity complicates evidence synthesis. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6405732/ /pubmed/30587059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009976 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis Cluckey, Andrew Perino, Alexander C. Yunus, Fahd N. Leef, George C. Askari, Mariam Heidenreich, Paul A. Narayan, Sanjiv M. Wang, Paul J. Turakhia, Mintu P. Efficacy of Ablation Lesion Sets in Addition to Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Findings From the SMASH‐AF Meta‐Analysis Study Cohort |
title | Efficacy of Ablation Lesion Sets in Addition to Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Findings From the SMASH‐AF Meta‐Analysis Study Cohort |
title_full | Efficacy of Ablation Lesion Sets in Addition to Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Findings From the SMASH‐AF Meta‐Analysis Study Cohort |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of Ablation Lesion Sets in Addition to Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Findings From the SMASH‐AF Meta‐Analysis Study Cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of Ablation Lesion Sets in Addition to Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Findings From the SMASH‐AF Meta‐Analysis Study Cohort |
title_short | Efficacy of Ablation Lesion Sets in Addition to Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Findings From the SMASH‐AF Meta‐Analysis Study Cohort |
title_sort | efficacy of ablation lesion sets in addition to pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: findings from the smash‐af meta‐analysis study cohort |
topic | Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6405732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30587059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009976 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cluckeyandrew efficacyofablationlesionsetsinadditiontopulmonaryveinisolationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationfindingsfromthesmashafmetaanalysisstudycohort AT perinoalexanderc efficacyofablationlesionsetsinadditiontopulmonaryveinisolationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationfindingsfromthesmashafmetaanalysisstudycohort AT yunusfahdn efficacyofablationlesionsetsinadditiontopulmonaryveinisolationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationfindingsfromthesmashafmetaanalysisstudycohort AT leefgeorgec efficacyofablationlesionsetsinadditiontopulmonaryveinisolationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationfindingsfromthesmashafmetaanalysisstudycohort AT askarimariam efficacyofablationlesionsetsinadditiontopulmonaryveinisolationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationfindingsfromthesmashafmetaanalysisstudycohort AT heidenreichpaula efficacyofablationlesionsetsinadditiontopulmonaryveinisolationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationfindingsfromthesmashafmetaanalysisstudycohort AT narayansanjivm efficacyofablationlesionsetsinadditiontopulmonaryveinisolationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationfindingsfromthesmashafmetaanalysisstudycohort AT wangpaulj efficacyofablationlesionsetsinadditiontopulmonaryveinisolationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationfindingsfromthesmashafmetaanalysisstudycohort AT turakhiamintup efficacyofablationlesionsetsinadditiontopulmonaryveinisolationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationfindingsfromthesmashafmetaanalysisstudycohort |