Cargando…

Emergence of new antigenic epitopes in the glycoproteins of human respiratory syncytial virus collected from a US surveillance study, 2015–17

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a significant cause of lower respiratory tract infection in infants and elderly. To understand the evolution of neutralizing epitopes on the RSV glycoprotein (G) and fusion (F) proteins, we conducted a multi-year surveillance program (OUTSMART-RSV) in the US. Ana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bin Lu, Liu, Hui, Tabor, David E., Tovchigrechko, Andrey, Qi, Yanping, Ruzin, Alexey, Esser, Mark T., Jin, Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6405860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30846850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40387-y
Descripción
Sumario:Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a significant cause of lower respiratory tract infection in infants and elderly. To understand the evolution of neutralizing epitopes on the RSV glycoprotein (G) and fusion (F) proteins, we conducted a multi-year surveillance program (OUTSMART-RSV) in the US. Analysis of 1,146 RSV samples from 2015–2017 revealed a slight shift in prevalence from RSV A (58.7%) to B (53.7%) between the two seasons. RSV B was more prevalent in elderly (52.9% and 73.4%). Approximately 1% of the samples contained both RSV A and B viruses. All RSV A isolates were ON1 and almost all the B isolates were BA9 genotypes. Compared with the 2013 reference sequences, changes at the F antigenic sites of RSV B were greater than RSV A, which mainly occurred at antigenic sites V (L172Q/S173L at 99.6%), Ø (I206M/Q209K at 18.6%) and IV (E463D at 7%) of RSV B F. Sequence diversities in the G protein second hypervariable region were observed in the duplicated regions for RSV A and B, and at the G stop codon resulting in extension of 7 amino acids (22.1%) for RSV B in 2016–17. Thus, RSV surface glycoproteins are continuously evolving, and continued surveillance is important for the clinical evaluation of immunoprophylactic products.