Cargando…

Equivalence analysis to support environmental safety assessment: Using nontarget organism count data from field trials with cisgenically modified potato

This paper considers the statistical analysis of entomological count data from field experiments with genetically modified (GM) plants. Such trials are carried out to assess environmental safety. Potential effects on nontarget organisms (NTOs), as indicators of biodiversity, are investigated. The Eu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Voet, Hilko, Goedhart, Paul W., Lazebnik, Jenny, Kessel, Geert J. T., Mullins, Ewen, van Loon, Joop J. A., Arpaia, Salvatore
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6405891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30891222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4964
_version_ 1783401180406218752
author van der Voet, Hilko
Goedhart, Paul W.
Lazebnik, Jenny
Kessel, Geert J. T.
Mullins, Ewen
van Loon, Joop J. A.
Arpaia, Salvatore
author_facet van der Voet, Hilko
Goedhart, Paul W.
Lazebnik, Jenny
Kessel, Geert J. T.
Mullins, Ewen
van Loon, Joop J. A.
Arpaia, Salvatore
author_sort van der Voet, Hilko
collection PubMed
description This paper considers the statistical analysis of entomological count data from field experiments with genetically modified (GM) plants. Such trials are carried out to assess environmental safety. Potential effects on nontarget organisms (NTOs), as indicators of biodiversity, are investigated. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) gives broad guidance on the environmental risk assessment (ERA) of GM plants. Field experiments must contain suitable comparator crops as a benchmark for the assessment of designated endpoints. In this paper, a detailed protocol is proposed to perform data analysis for the purpose of assessing environmental safety. The protocol includes the specification of a list of endpoints and their hierarchical relations, the specification of intended levels of data analysis, and the specification of provisional limits of concern to decide on the need for further investigation. The protocol emphasizes a graphical representation of estimates and confidence intervals for the ratio of mean abundances for the GM plant and its comparator crop. Interpretation relies mainly on equivalence testing in which confidence intervals are compared with the limits of concern. The proposed methodology is illustrated with entomological count data resulting from multiyear, multilocation field trials. A cisgenically modified potato line (with enhanced resistance to late blight disease) was compared to the original conventional potato variety in the Netherlands and Ireland in two successive years (2013, 2014). It is shown that the protocol encompasses alternative schemes for safety assessment resulting from different research questions and/or expert choices. Graphical displays of equivalence testing at several hierarchical levels and their interpretation are presented for one of these schemes. The proposed approaches should be of help in the ERA of GM or other novel plants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6405891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64058912019-03-19 Equivalence analysis to support environmental safety assessment: Using nontarget organism count data from field trials with cisgenically modified potato van der Voet, Hilko Goedhart, Paul W. Lazebnik, Jenny Kessel, Geert J. T. Mullins, Ewen van Loon, Joop J. A. Arpaia, Salvatore Ecol Evol Original Research This paper considers the statistical analysis of entomological count data from field experiments with genetically modified (GM) plants. Such trials are carried out to assess environmental safety. Potential effects on nontarget organisms (NTOs), as indicators of biodiversity, are investigated. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) gives broad guidance on the environmental risk assessment (ERA) of GM plants. Field experiments must contain suitable comparator crops as a benchmark for the assessment of designated endpoints. In this paper, a detailed protocol is proposed to perform data analysis for the purpose of assessing environmental safety. The protocol includes the specification of a list of endpoints and their hierarchical relations, the specification of intended levels of data analysis, and the specification of provisional limits of concern to decide on the need for further investigation. The protocol emphasizes a graphical representation of estimates and confidence intervals for the ratio of mean abundances for the GM plant and its comparator crop. Interpretation relies mainly on equivalence testing in which confidence intervals are compared with the limits of concern. The proposed methodology is illustrated with entomological count data resulting from multiyear, multilocation field trials. A cisgenically modified potato line (with enhanced resistance to late blight disease) was compared to the original conventional potato variety in the Netherlands and Ireland in two successive years (2013, 2014). It is shown that the protocol encompasses alternative schemes for safety assessment resulting from different research questions and/or expert choices. Graphical displays of equivalence testing at several hierarchical levels and their interpretation are presented for one of these schemes. The proposed approaches should be of help in the ERA of GM or other novel plants. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6405891/ /pubmed/30891222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4964 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
van der Voet, Hilko
Goedhart, Paul W.
Lazebnik, Jenny
Kessel, Geert J. T.
Mullins, Ewen
van Loon, Joop J. A.
Arpaia, Salvatore
Equivalence analysis to support environmental safety assessment: Using nontarget organism count data from field trials with cisgenically modified potato
title Equivalence analysis to support environmental safety assessment: Using nontarget organism count data from field trials with cisgenically modified potato
title_full Equivalence analysis to support environmental safety assessment: Using nontarget organism count data from field trials with cisgenically modified potato
title_fullStr Equivalence analysis to support environmental safety assessment: Using nontarget organism count data from field trials with cisgenically modified potato
title_full_unstemmed Equivalence analysis to support environmental safety assessment: Using nontarget organism count data from field trials with cisgenically modified potato
title_short Equivalence analysis to support environmental safety assessment: Using nontarget organism count data from field trials with cisgenically modified potato
title_sort equivalence analysis to support environmental safety assessment: using nontarget organism count data from field trials with cisgenically modified potato
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6405891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30891222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4964
work_keys_str_mv AT vandervoethilko equivalenceanalysistosupportenvironmentalsafetyassessmentusingnontargetorganismcountdatafromfieldtrialswithcisgenicallymodifiedpotato
AT goedhartpaulw equivalenceanalysistosupportenvironmentalsafetyassessmentusingnontargetorganismcountdatafromfieldtrialswithcisgenicallymodifiedpotato
AT lazebnikjenny equivalenceanalysistosupportenvironmentalsafetyassessmentusingnontargetorganismcountdatafromfieldtrialswithcisgenicallymodifiedpotato
AT kesselgeertjt equivalenceanalysistosupportenvironmentalsafetyassessmentusingnontargetorganismcountdatafromfieldtrialswithcisgenicallymodifiedpotato
AT mullinsewen equivalenceanalysistosupportenvironmentalsafetyassessmentusingnontargetorganismcountdatafromfieldtrialswithcisgenicallymodifiedpotato
AT vanloonjoopja equivalenceanalysistosupportenvironmentalsafetyassessmentusingnontargetorganismcountdatafromfieldtrialswithcisgenicallymodifiedpotato
AT arpaiasalvatore equivalenceanalysistosupportenvironmentalsafetyassessmentusingnontargetorganismcountdatafromfieldtrialswithcisgenicallymodifiedpotato