Cargando…

Previously published drug interaction models predict loss of response for transoesophageal echocardiography sedation well but not response to oesophageal instrumentation

Response surface models (RSMs) were used to predict effects of multiple drugs interactions. Our study was aimed to validate accuracy of the previous published volunteer models during transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE). This is a cross-sectional study with 20 patients scheduled for transesophage...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Su, Fu-Wei, Ting, Chien-Kun, Liou, Jing-Yang, Chen, Yi-Chang, Tsou, Mei-Yung, Wang, Shen-Chih
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6405922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30846741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40366-3
_version_ 1783401187616227328
author Su, Fu-Wei
Ting, Chien-Kun
Liou, Jing-Yang
Chen, Yi-Chang
Tsou, Mei-Yung
Wang, Shen-Chih
author_facet Su, Fu-Wei
Ting, Chien-Kun
Liou, Jing-Yang
Chen, Yi-Chang
Tsou, Mei-Yung
Wang, Shen-Chih
author_sort Su, Fu-Wei
collection PubMed
description Response surface models (RSMs) were used to predict effects of multiple drugs interactions. Our study was aimed to validate accuracy of the previous published volunteer models during transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE). This is a cross-sectional study with 20 patients scheduled for transesophageal echocardiography in Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan. Effect-site concentration pairs of alfentanil and propofol were recorded and converted to equivalent remifentanil and propofol effect-site concentrations. Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scores were assessed every 2 minutes. Using these data, previous published models of loss of response (LOR), intolerable ventilatory depression (IVD), and loss of response to esophageal instrumentation (LREI) were then estimated. Accuracy of prediction is assessed by calculating the difference between the true response and the model-predicted probability. Clinical events such as interruption of TEE were recorded. The average procedure time was 11 minutes. Accuracy for prediction of LOR and LREI is 63.6% and 38.5%, respectively. There were four patients experienced desaturation for less than 1 minute, which were not predicted by IVD model, and one interruption of TEE due to involuntary movement. The previous published drug-interaction RSMs predict LOR well but not LREI for TEE sedation. Further studies using response surface methodology are needed to improve quality for TEE sedation and clinical implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6405922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64059222019-03-12 Previously published drug interaction models predict loss of response for transoesophageal echocardiography sedation well but not response to oesophageal instrumentation Su, Fu-Wei Ting, Chien-Kun Liou, Jing-Yang Chen, Yi-Chang Tsou, Mei-Yung Wang, Shen-Chih Sci Rep Article Response surface models (RSMs) were used to predict effects of multiple drugs interactions. Our study was aimed to validate accuracy of the previous published volunteer models during transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE). This is a cross-sectional study with 20 patients scheduled for transesophageal echocardiography in Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan. Effect-site concentration pairs of alfentanil and propofol were recorded and converted to equivalent remifentanil and propofol effect-site concentrations. Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scores were assessed every 2 minutes. Using these data, previous published models of loss of response (LOR), intolerable ventilatory depression (IVD), and loss of response to esophageal instrumentation (LREI) were then estimated. Accuracy of prediction is assessed by calculating the difference between the true response and the model-predicted probability. Clinical events such as interruption of TEE were recorded. The average procedure time was 11 minutes. Accuracy for prediction of LOR and LREI is 63.6% and 38.5%, respectively. There were four patients experienced desaturation for less than 1 minute, which were not predicted by IVD model, and one interruption of TEE due to involuntary movement. The previous published drug-interaction RSMs predict LOR well but not LREI for TEE sedation. Further studies using response surface methodology are needed to improve quality for TEE sedation and clinical implementation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6405922/ /pubmed/30846741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40366-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Su, Fu-Wei
Ting, Chien-Kun
Liou, Jing-Yang
Chen, Yi-Chang
Tsou, Mei-Yung
Wang, Shen-Chih
Previously published drug interaction models predict loss of response for transoesophageal echocardiography sedation well but not response to oesophageal instrumentation
title Previously published drug interaction models predict loss of response for transoesophageal echocardiography sedation well but not response to oesophageal instrumentation
title_full Previously published drug interaction models predict loss of response for transoesophageal echocardiography sedation well but not response to oesophageal instrumentation
title_fullStr Previously published drug interaction models predict loss of response for transoesophageal echocardiography sedation well but not response to oesophageal instrumentation
title_full_unstemmed Previously published drug interaction models predict loss of response for transoesophageal echocardiography sedation well but not response to oesophageal instrumentation
title_short Previously published drug interaction models predict loss of response for transoesophageal echocardiography sedation well but not response to oesophageal instrumentation
title_sort previously published drug interaction models predict loss of response for transoesophageal echocardiography sedation well but not response to oesophageal instrumentation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6405922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30846741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40366-3
work_keys_str_mv AT sufuwei previouslypublisheddruginteractionmodelspredictlossofresponsefortransoesophagealechocardiographysedationwellbutnotresponsetooesophagealinstrumentation
AT tingchienkun previouslypublisheddruginteractionmodelspredictlossofresponsefortransoesophagealechocardiographysedationwellbutnotresponsetooesophagealinstrumentation
AT lioujingyang previouslypublisheddruginteractionmodelspredictlossofresponsefortransoesophagealechocardiographysedationwellbutnotresponsetooesophagealinstrumentation
AT chenyichang previouslypublisheddruginteractionmodelspredictlossofresponsefortransoesophagealechocardiographysedationwellbutnotresponsetooesophagealinstrumentation
AT tsoumeiyung previouslypublisheddruginteractionmodelspredictlossofresponsefortransoesophagealechocardiographysedationwellbutnotresponsetooesophagealinstrumentation
AT wangshenchih previouslypublisheddruginteractionmodelspredictlossofresponsefortransoesophagealechocardiographysedationwellbutnotresponsetooesophagealinstrumentation