Cargando…
Viewpoints of the target population regarding barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in the Czech Republic
BACKGROUND: Public awareness of colorectal cancer (CRC) and uptake of CRC screening remain challenges. The viewpoints of the target population (asymptomatic individuals older than 50) regarding CRC screening information sources and the reasons for and against participation in CRC screening are not w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30863000 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1132 |
_version_ | 1783401242090799104 |
---|---|
author | Kroupa, Radek Ondrackova, Monika Kovalcikova, Petra Dastych, Milan Pavlik, Tomas Kunovsky, Lumir Dolina, Jiri |
author_facet | Kroupa, Radek Ondrackova, Monika Kovalcikova, Petra Dastych, Milan Pavlik, Tomas Kunovsky, Lumir Dolina, Jiri |
author_sort | Kroupa, Radek |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Public awareness of colorectal cancer (CRC) and uptake of CRC screening remain challenges. The viewpoints of the target population (asymptomatic individuals older than 50) regarding CRC screening information sources and the reasons for and against participation in CRC screening are not well known in the Czech Republic. This study aimed to acquire independent opinions from the target population independently on the health system. AIM: To investigate the viewpoints of the target population regarding the source of information for and barriers and facilitators of CRC screening. METHODS: A survey among relatives (aged 50 and older) of university students was conducted. Participants answered a questionnaire about sources of awareness regarding CRC screening, reasons for and against participation, and suggestions for improvements in CRC screening. The effect of certain variables on participation in CRC screening was analyzed. RESULTS: Of 498 participants, 478 (96%) respondents had some information about CRC screening and 375 (75.3%) had participated in a CRC screening test. General practitioners (GPs) (n = 319, 64.1%) and traditional media (n = 166, 33.3%) were the most common information sources regarding CRC screening. A lack of interest or time and a fear of colonoscopy or positive results were reported as reasons for non-participation. Individuals aged > 60 years [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.42-3.71), P = 0.001], females (aOR = 1.95, 95%CI (1.26-3.01) P = 0.003), and relatives of CRC patients (aOR = 4.17, 95%CI (1.82-9.58) P = 0.001) were more likely to participate in screening. Information regarding screening provided by physicians - GPs: (aOR = 8.11, 95%CI (4.90-13.41), P < 0.001) and other specialists (aOR = 4.19, 95%CI (1.87-9.38), P = 0.001) increased participation in screening. Respondents suggested that providing better explanations regarding screening procedures and equipment for stool capturing could improve CRC screening uptake. CONCLUSION: GPs and other specialists play crucial roles in the successful uptake of CRC screening. Reduction of the fear of colonoscopy and simple equipment for stool sampling might assist in improving the uptake of CRC screening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6406183 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64061832019-03-12 Viewpoints of the target population regarding barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in the Czech Republic Kroupa, Radek Ondrackova, Monika Kovalcikova, Petra Dastych, Milan Pavlik, Tomas Kunovsky, Lumir Dolina, Jiri World J Gastroenterol Observational Study BACKGROUND: Public awareness of colorectal cancer (CRC) and uptake of CRC screening remain challenges. The viewpoints of the target population (asymptomatic individuals older than 50) regarding CRC screening information sources and the reasons for and against participation in CRC screening are not well known in the Czech Republic. This study aimed to acquire independent opinions from the target population independently on the health system. AIM: To investigate the viewpoints of the target population regarding the source of information for and barriers and facilitators of CRC screening. METHODS: A survey among relatives (aged 50 and older) of university students was conducted. Participants answered a questionnaire about sources of awareness regarding CRC screening, reasons for and against participation, and suggestions for improvements in CRC screening. The effect of certain variables on participation in CRC screening was analyzed. RESULTS: Of 498 participants, 478 (96%) respondents had some information about CRC screening and 375 (75.3%) had participated in a CRC screening test. General practitioners (GPs) (n = 319, 64.1%) and traditional media (n = 166, 33.3%) were the most common information sources regarding CRC screening. A lack of interest or time and a fear of colonoscopy or positive results were reported as reasons for non-participation. Individuals aged > 60 years [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.42-3.71), P = 0.001], females (aOR = 1.95, 95%CI (1.26-3.01) P = 0.003), and relatives of CRC patients (aOR = 4.17, 95%CI (1.82-9.58) P = 0.001) were more likely to participate in screening. Information regarding screening provided by physicians - GPs: (aOR = 8.11, 95%CI (4.90-13.41), P < 0.001) and other specialists (aOR = 4.19, 95%CI (1.87-9.38), P = 0.001) increased participation in screening. Respondents suggested that providing better explanations regarding screening procedures and equipment for stool capturing could improve CRC screening uptake. CONCLUSION: GPs and other specialists play crucial roles in the successful uptake of CRC screening. Reduction of the fear of colonoscopy and simple equipment for stool sampling might assist in improving the uptake of CRC screening. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019-03-07 2019-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6406183/ /pubmed/30863000 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1132 Text en ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Observational Study Kroupa, Radek Ondrackova, Monika Kovalcikova, Petra Dastych, Milan Pavlik, Tomas Kunovsky, Lumir Dolina, Jiri Viewpoints of the target population regarding barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in the Czech Republic |
title | Viewpoints of the target population regarding barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in the Czech Republic |
title_full | Viewpoints of the target population regarding barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in the Czech Republic |
title_fullStr | Viewpoints of the target population regarding barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in the Czech Republic |
title_full_unstemmed | Viewpoints of the target population regarding barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in the Czech Republic |
title_short | Viewpoints of the target population regarding barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in the Czech Republic |
title_sort | viewpoints of the target population regarding barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in the czech republic |
topic | Observational Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30863000 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1132 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krouparadek viewpointsofthetargetpopulationregardingbarriersandfacilitatorsofcolorectalcancerscreeningintheczechrepublic AT ondrackovamonika viewpointsofthetargetpopulationregardingbarriersandfacilitatorsofcolorectalcancerscreeningintheczechrepublic AT kovalcikovapetra viewpointsofthetargetpopulationregardingbarriersandfacilitatorsofcolorectalcancerscreeningintheczechrepublic AT dastychmilan viewpointsofthetargetpopulationregardingbarriersandfacilitatorsofcolorectalcancerscreeningintheczechrepublic AT pavliktomas viewpointsofthetargetpopulationregardingbarriersandfacilitatorsofcolorectalcancerscreeningintheczechrepublic AT kunovskylumir viewpointsofthetargetpopulationregardingbarriersandfacilitatorsofcolorectalcancerscreeningintheczechrepublic AT dolinajiri viewpointsofthetargetpopulationregardingbarriersandfacilitatorsofcolorectalcancerscreeningintheczechrepublic |