Cargando…

Viewpoints of the target population regarding barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in the Czech Republic

BACKGROUND: Public awareness of colorectal cancer (CRC) and uptake of CRC screening remain challenges. The viewpoints of the target population (asymptomatic individuals older than 50) regarding CRC screening information sources and the reasons for and against participation in CRC screening are not w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kroupa, Radek, Ondrackova, Monika, Kovalcikova, Petra, Dastych, Milan, Pavlik, Tomas, Kunovsky, Lumir, Dolina, Jiri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30863000
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1132
_version_ 1783401242090799104
author Kroupa, Radek
Ondrackova, Monika
Kovalcikova, Petra
Dastych, Milan
Pavlik, Tomas
Kunovsky, Lumir
Dolina, Jiri
author_facet Kroupa, Radek
Ondrackova, Monika
Kovalcikova, Petra
Dastych, Milan
Pavlik, Tomas
Kunovsky, Lumir
Dolina, Jiri
author_sort Kroupa, Radek
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Public awareness of colorectal cancer (CRC) and uptake of CRC screening remain challenges. The viewpoints of the target population (asymptomatic individuals older than 50) regarding CRC screening information sources and the reasons for and against participation in CRC screening are not well known in the Czech Republic. This study aimed to acquire independent opinions from the target population independently on the health system. AIM: To investigate the viewpoints of the target population regarding the source of information for and barriers and facilitators of CRC screening. METHODS: A survey among relatives (aged 50 and older) of university students was conducted. Participants answered a questionnaire about sources of awareness regarding CRC screening, reasons for and against participation, and suggestions for improvements in CRC screening. The effect of certain variables on participation in CRC screening was analyzed. RESULTS: Of 498 participants, 478 (96%) respondents had some information about CRC screening and 375 (75.3%) had participated in a CRC screening test. General practitioners (GPs) (n = 319, 64.1%) and traditional media (n = 166, 33.3%) were the most common information sources regarding CRC screening. A lack of interest or time and a fear of colonoscopy or positive results were reported as reasons for non-participation. Individuals aged > 60 years [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.42-3.71), P = 0.001], females (aOR = 1.95, 95%CI (1.26-3.01) P = 0.003), and relatives of CRC patients (aOR = 4.17, 95%CI (1.82-9.58) P = 0.001) were more likely to participate in screening. Information regarding screening provided by physicians - GPs: (aOR = 8.11, 95%CI (4.90-13.41), P < 0.001) and other specialists (aOR = 4.19, 95%CI (1.87-9.38), P = 0.001) increased participation in screening. Respondents suggested that providing better explanations regarding screening procedures and equipment for stool capturing could improve CRC screening uptake. CONCLUSION: GPs and other specialists play crucial roles in the successful uptake of CRC screening. Reduction of the fear of colonoscopy and simple equipment for stool sampling might assist in improving the uptake of CRC screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6406183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64061832019-03-12 Viewpoints of the target population regarding barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in the Czech Republic Kroupa, Radek Ondrackova, Monika Kovalcikova, Petra Dastych, Milan Pavlik, Tomas Kunovsky, Lumir Dolina, Jiri World J Gastroenterol Observational Study BACKGROUND: Public awareness of colorectal cancer (CRC) and uptake of CRC screening remain challenges. The viewpoints of the target population (asymptomatic individuals older than 50) regarding CRC screening information sources and the reasons for and against participation in CRC screening are not well known in the Czech Republic. This study aimed to acquire independent opinions from the target population independently on the health system. AIM: To investigate the viewpoints of the target population regarding the source of information for and barriers and facilitators of CRC screening. METHODS: A survey among relatives (aged 50 and older) of university students was conducted. Participants answered a questionnaire about sources of awareness regarding CRC screening, reasons for and against participation, and suggestions for improvements in CRC screening. The effect of certain variables on participation in CRC screening was analyzed. RESULTS: Of 498 participants, 478 (96%) respondents had some information about CRC screening and 375 (75.3%) had participated in a CRC screening test. General practitioners (GPs) (n = 319, 64.1%) and traditional media (n = 166, 33.3%) were the most common information sources regarding CRC screening. A lack of interest or time and a fear of colonoscopy or positive results were reported as reasons for non-participation. Individuals aged > 60 years [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.42-3.71), P = 0.001], females (aOR = 1.95, 95%CI (1.26-3.01) P = 0.003), and relatives of CRC patients (aOR = 4.17, 95%CI (1.82-9.58) P = 0.001) were more likely to participate in screening. Information regarding screening provided by physicians - GPs: (aOR = 8.11, 95%CI (4.90-13.41), P < 0.001) and other specialists (aOR = 4.19, 95%CI (1.87-9.38), P = 0.001) increased participation in screening. Respondents suggested that providing better explanations regarding screening procedures and equipment for stool capturing could improve CRC screening uptake. CONCLUSION: GPs and other specialists play crucial roles in the successful uptake of CRC screening. Reduction of the fear of colonoscopy and simple equipment for stool sampling might assist in improving the uptake of CRC screening. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019-03-07 2019-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6406183/ /pubmed/30863000 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1132 Text en ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Observational Study
Kroupa, Radek
Ondrackova, Monika
Kovalcikova, Petra
Dastych, Milan
Pavlik, Tomas
Kunovsky, Lumir
Dolina, Jiri
Viewpoints of the target population regarding barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in the Czech Republic
title Viewpoints of the target population regarding barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in the Czech Republic
title_full Viewpoints of the target population regarding barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in the Czech Republic
title_fullStr Viewpoints of the target population regarding barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in the Czech Republic
title_full_unstemmed Viewpoints of the target population regarding barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in the Czech Republic
title_short Viewpoints of the target population regarding barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in the Czech Republic
title_sort viewpoints of the target population regarding barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in the czech republic
topic Observational Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30863000
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1132
work_keys_str_mv AT krouparadek viewpointsofthetargetpopulationregardingbarriersandfacilitatorsofcolorectalcancerscreeningintheczechrepublic
AT ondrackovamonika viewpointsofthetargetpopulationregardingbarriersandfacilitatorsofcolorectalcancerscreeningintheczechrepublic
AT kovalcikovapetra viewpointsofthetargetpopulationregardingbarriersandfacilitatorsofcolorectalcancerscreeningintheczechrepublic
AT dastychmilan viewpointsofthetargetpopulationregardingbarriersandfacilitatorsofcolorectalcancerscreeningintheczechrepublic
AT pavliktomas viewpointsofthetargetpopulationregardingbarriersandfacilitatorsofcolorectalcancerscreeningintheczechrepublic
AT kunovskylumir viewpointsofthetargetpopulationregardingbarriersandfacilitatorsofcolorectalcancerscreeningintheczechrepublic
AT dolinajiri viewpointsofthetargetpopulationregardingbarriersandfacilitatorsofcolorectalcancerscreeningintheczechrepublic