Cargando…
Does Risk-Adapted Proton Beam Therapy Have a Role as a Complementary or Alternative Therapeutic Option for Hepatocellular Carcinoma?
To evaluate the role of risk-adapted proton beam therapy (PBT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, a total of 243 HCC patients receiving risk-adapted PBT with three dose-fractionation regimens (regimen A [n = 40], B [n = 60], and C [n = 143]) according to the proximity of their gastrointesti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406298/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30781391 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11020230 |
_version_ | 1783401268897644544 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Tae Hyun Park, Joong-Won Kim, Bo Hyun Kim, Hyunjung Moon, Sung Ho Kim, Sang Soo Woo, Sang Myung Koh, Young-Hwan Lee, Woo Jin Kim, Dae Yong Kim, Chang-Min |
author_facet | Kim, Tae Hyun Park, Joong-Won Kim, Bo Hyun Kim, Hyunjung Moon, Sung Ho Kim, Sang Soo Woo, Sang Myung Koh, Young-Hwan Lee, Woo Jin Kim, Dae Yong Kim, Chang-Min |
author_sort | Kim, Tae Hyun |
collection | PubMed |
description | To evaluate the role of risk-adapted proton beam therapy (PBT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, a total of 243 HCC patients receiving risk-adapted PBT with three dose-fractionation regimens (regimen A [n = 40], B [n = 60], and C [n = 143]) according to the proximity of their gastrointestinal organs (<1 cm, 1–1.9 cm, and ≥2 cm, respectively) were reviewed: The prescribed doses to planning target volume 1 (PTV1) were 50 gray equivalents (GyE) (EQD2 [equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions], 62.5 GyE(10)), 60 GyE (EQD2, 80 GyE(10)), and 66 GyE (EQD2, 91.3 GyE(10)) in 10 fractions, respectively, and those of PTV2 were 30 GyE (EQD2, 32.5 GyE(10)) in 10 fractions. In all patients, the five-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 87.5% and 48.1%, respectively, with grade ≥3 toxicity of 0.4%. In regimens A, B, and C, the five-year LRFS and OS rates were 54.6%, 94.7%, and 92.4% (p < 0.001), and 16.7%, 39.2%, and 67.9% (p < 0.001), respectively. The five-year OS rates of the patients with the Modified Union for International Cancer Control (mUICC) stages I, II, III, and IVA and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages A, B, and C were 69.2%, 65.4%, 43.8%, and 26.6% (p < 0.001), respectively, and 65.1%, 40%, and 32.2% (p < 0.001), respectively. PBT could achieve promising long-term tumor control and have a potential role as a complementary or alternative therapeutic option across all stages of HCC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6406298 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64062982019-03-21 Does Risk-Adapted Proton Beam Therapy Have a Role as a Complementary or Alternative Therapeutic Option for Hepatocellular Carcinoma? Kim, Tae Hyun Park, Joong-Won Kim, Bo Hyun Kim, Hyunjung Moon, Sung Ho Kim, Sang Soo Woo, Sang Myung Koh, Young-Hwan Lee, Woo Jin Kim, Dae Yong Kim, Chang-Min Cancers (Basel) Article To evaluate the role of risk-adapted proton beam therapy (PBT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, a total of 243 HCC patients receiving risk-adapted PBT with three dose-fractionation regimens (regimen A [n = 40], B [n = 60], and C [n = 143]) according to the proximity of their gastrointestinal organs (<1 cm, 1–1.9 cm, and ≥2 cm, respectively) were reviewed: The prescribed doses to planning target volume 1 (PTV1) were 50 gray equivalents (GyE) (EQD2 [equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions], 62.5 GyE(10)), 60 GyE (EQD2, 80 GyE(10)), and 66 GyE (EQD2, 91.3 GyE(10)) in 10 fractions, respectively, and those of PTV2 were 30 GyE (EQD2, 32.5 GyE(10)) in 10 fractions. In all patients, the five-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 87.5% and 48.1%, respectively, with grade ≥3 toxicity of 0.4%. In regimens A, B, and C, the five-year LRFS and OS rates were 54.6%, 94.7%, and 92.4% (p < 0.001), and 16.7%, 39.2%, and 67.9% (p < 0.001), respectively. The five-year OS rates of the patients with the Modified Union for International Cancer Control (mUICC) stages I, II, III, and IVA and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages A, B, and C were 69.2%, 65.4%, 43.8%, and 26.6% (p < 0.001), respectively, and 65.1%, 40%, and 32.2% (p < 0.001), respectively. PBT could achieve promising long-term tumor control and have a potential role as a complementary or alternative therapeutic option across all stages of HCC. MDPI 2019-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6406298/ /pubmed/30781391 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11020230 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kim, Tae Hyun Park, Joong-Won Kim, Bo Hyun Kim, Hyunjung Moon, Sung Ho Kim, Sang Soo Woo, Sang Myung Koh, Young-Hwan Lee, Woo Jin Kim, Dae Yong Kim, Chang-Min Does Risk-Adapted Proton Beam Therapy Have a Role as a Complementary or Alternative Therapeutic Option for Hepatocellular Carcinoma? |
title | Does Risk-Adapted Proton Beam Therapy Have a Role as a Complementary or Alternative Therapeutic Option for Hepatocellular Carcinoma? |
title_full | Does Risk-Adapted Proton Beam Therapy Have a Role as a Complementary or Alternative Therapeutic Option for Hepatocellular Carcinoma? |
title_fullStr | Does Risk-Adapted Proton Beam Therapy Have a Role as a Complementary or Alternative Therapeutic Option for Hepatocellular Carcinoma? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Risk-Adapted Proton Beam Therapy Have a Role as a Complementary or Alternative Therapeutic Option for Hepatocellular Carcinoma? |
title_short | Does Risk-Adapted Proton Beam Therapy Have a Role as a Complementary or Alternative Therapeutic Option for Hepatocellular Carcinoma? |
title_sort | does risk-adapted proton beam therapy have a role as a complementary or alternative therapeutic option for hepatocellular carcinoma? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406298/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30781391 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11020230 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimtaehyun doesriskadaptedprotonbeamtherapyhavearoleasacomplementaryoralternativetherapeuticoptionforhepatocellularcarcinoma AT parkjoongwon doesriskadaptedprotonbeamtherapyhavearoleasacomplementaryoralternativetherapeuticoptionforhepatocellularcarcinoma AT kimbohyun doesriskadaptedprotonbeamtherapyhavearoleasacomplementaryoralternativetherapeuticoptionforhepatocellularcarcinoma AT kimhyunjung doesriskadaptedprotonbeamtherapyhavearoleasacomplementaryoralternativetherapeuticoptionforhepatocellularcarcinoma AT moonsungho doesriskadaptedprotonbeamtherapyhavearoleasacomplementaryoralternativetherapeuticoptionforhepatocellularcarcinoma AT kimsangsoo doesriskadaptedprotonbeamtherapyhavearoleasacomplementaryoralternativetherapeuticoptionforhepatocellularcarcinoma AT woosangmyung doesriskadaptedprotonbeamtherapyhavearoleasacomplementaryoralternativetherapeuticoptionforhepatocellularcarcinoma AT kohyounghwan doesriskadaptedprotonbeamtherapyhavearoleasacomplementaryoralternativetherapeuticoptionforhepatocellularcarcinoma AT leewoojin doesriskadaptedprotonbeamtherapyhavearoleasacomplementaryoralternativetherapeuticoptionforhepatocellularcarcinoma AT kimdaeyong doesriskadaptedprotonbeamtherapyhavearoleasacomplementaryoralternativetherapeuticoptionforhepatocellularcarcinoma AT kimchangmin doesriskadaptedprotonbeamtherapyhavearoleasacomplementaryoralternativetherapeuticoptionforhepatocellularcarcinoma |