Cargando…

Does Risk-Adapted Proton Beam Therapy Have a Role as a Complementary or Alternative Therapeutic Option for Hepatocellular Carcinoma?

To evaluate the role of risk-adapted proton beam therapy (PBT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, a total of 243 HCC patients receiving risk-adapted PBT with three dose-fractionation regimens (regimen A [n = 40], B [n = 60], and C [n = 143]) according to the proximity of their gastrointesti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Tae Hyun, Park, Joong-Won, Kim, Bo Hyun, Kim, Hyunjung, Moon, Sung Ho, Kim, Sang Soo, Woo, Sang Myung, Koh, Young-Hwan, Lee, Woo Jin, Kim, Dae Yong, Kim, Chang-Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30781391
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11020230
_version_ 1783401268897644544
author Kim, Tae Hyun
Park, Joong-Won
Kim, Bo Hyun
Kim, Hyunjung
Moon, Sung Ho
Kim, Sang Soo
Woo, Sang Myung
Koh, Young-Hwan
Lee, Woo Jin
Kim, Dae Yong
Kim, Chang-Min
author_facet Kim, Tae Hyun
Park, Joong-Won
Kim, Bo Hyun
Kim, Hyunjung
Moon, Sung Ho
Kim, Sang Soo
Woo, Sang Myung
Koh, Young-Hwan
Lee, Woo Jin
Kim, Dae Yong
Kim, Chang-Min
author_sort Kim, Tae Hyun
collection PubMed
description To evaluate the role of risk-adapted proton beam therapy (PBT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, a total of 243 HCC patients receiving risk-adapted PBT with three dose-fractionation regimens (regimen A [n = 40], B [n = 60], and C [n = 143]) according to the proximity of their gastrointestinal organs (<1 cm, 1–1.9 cm, and ≥2 cm, respectively) were reviewed: The prescribed doses to planning target volume 1 (PTV1) were 50 gray equivalents (GyE) (EQD2 [equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions], 62.5 GyE(10)), 60 GyE (EQD2, 80 GyE(10)), and 66 GyE (EQD2, 91.3 GyE(10)) in 10 fractions, respectively, and those of PTV2 were 30 GyE (EQD2, 32.5 GyE(10)) in 10 fractions. In all patients, the five-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 87.5% and 48.1%, respectively, with grade ≥3 toxicity of 0.4%. In regimens A, B, and C, the five-year LRFS and OS rates were 54.6%, 94.7%, and 92.4% (p < 0.001), and 16.7%, 39.2%, and 67.9% (p < 0.001), respectively. The five-year OS rates of the patients with the Modified Union for International Cancer Control (mUICC) stages I, II, III, and IVA and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages A, B, and C were 69.2%, 65.4%, 43.8%, and 26.6% (p < 0.001), respectively, and 65.1%, 40%, and 32.2% (p < 0.001), respectively. PBT could achieve promising long-term tumor control and have a potential role as a complementary or alternative therapeutic option across all stages of HCC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6406298
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64062982019-03-21 Does Risk-Adapted Proton Beam Therapy Have a Role as a Complementary or Alternative Therapeutic Option for Hepatocellular Carcinoma? Kim, Tae Hyun Park, Joong-Won Kim, Bo Hyun Kim, Hyunjung Moon, Sung Ho Kim, Sang Soo Woo, Sang Myung Koh, Young-Hwan Lee, Woo Jin Kim, Dae Yong Kim, Chang-Min Cancers (Basel) Article To evaluate the role of risk-adapted proton beam therapy (PBT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, a total of 243 HCC patients receiving risk-adapted PBT with three dose-fractionation regimens (regimen A [n = 40], B [n = 60], and C [n = 143]) according to the proximity of their gastrointestinal organs (<1 cm, 1–1.9 cm, and ≥2 cm, respectively) were reviewed: The prescribed doses to planning target volume 1 (PTV1) were 50 gray equivalents (GyE) (EQD2 [equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions], 62.5 GyE(10)), 60 GyE (EQD2, 80 GyE(10)), and 66 GyE (EQD2, 91.3 GyE(10)) in 10 fractions, respectively, and those of PTV2 were 30 GyE (EQD2, 32.5 GyE(10)) in 10 fractions. In all patients, the five-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 87.5% and 48.1%, respectively, with grade ≥3 toxicity of 0.4%. In regimens A, B, and C, the five-year LRFS and OS rates were 54.6%, 94.7%, and 92.4% (p < 0.001), and 16.7%, 39.2%, and 67.9% (p < 0.001), respectively. The five-year OS rates of the patients with the Modified Union for International Cancer Control (mUICC) stages I, II, III, and IVA and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages A, B, and C were 69.2%, 65.4%, 43.8%, and 26.6% (p < 0.001), respectively, and 65.1%, 40%, and 32.2% (p < 0.001), respectively. PBT could achieve promising long-term tumor control and have a potential role as a complementary or alternative therapeutic option across all stages of HCC. MDPI 2019-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6406298/ /pubmed/30781391 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11020230 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kim, Tae Hyun
Park, Joong-Won
Kim, Bo Hyun
Kim, Hyunjung
Moon, Sung Ho
Kim, Sang Soo
Woo, Sang Myung
Koh, Young-Hwan
Lee, Woo Jin
Kim, Dae Yong
Kim, Chang-Min
Does Risk-Adapted Proton Beam Therapy Have a Role as a Complementary or Alternative Therapeutic Option for Hepatocellular Carcinoma?
title Does Risk-Adapted Proton Beam Therapy Have a Role as a Complementary or Alternative Therapeutic Option for Hepatocellular Carcinoma?
title_full Does Risk-Adapted Proton Beam Therapy Have a Role as a Complementary or Alternative Therapeutic Option for Hepatocellular Carcinoma?
title_fullStr Does Risk-Adapted Proton Beam Therapy Have a Role as a Complementary or Alternative Therapeutic Option for Hepatocellular Carcinoma?
title_full_unstemmed Does Risk-Adapted Proton Beam Therapy Have a Role as a Complementary or Alternative Therapeutic Option for Hepatocellular Carcinoma?
title_short Does Risk-Adapted Proton Beam Therapy Have a Role as a Complementary or Alternative Therapeutic Option for Hepatocellular Carcinoma?
title_sort does risk-adapted proton beam therapy have a role as a complementary or alternative therapeutic option for hepatocellular carcinoma?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30781391
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11020230
work_keys_str_mv AT kimtaehyun doesriskadaptedprotonbeamtherapyhavearoleasacomplementaryoralternativetherapeuticoptionforhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT parkjoongwon doesriskadaptedprotonbeamtherapyhavearoleasacomplementaryoralternativetherapeuticoptionforhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT kimbohyun doesriskadaptedprotonbeamtherapyhavearoleasacomplementaryoralternativetherapeuticoptionforhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT kimhyunjung doesriskadaptedprotonbeamtherapyhavearoleasacomplementaryoralternativetherapeuticoptionforhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT moonsungho doesriskadaptedprotonbeamtherapyhavearoleasacomplementaryoralternativetherapeuticoptionforhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT kimsangsoo doesriskadaptedprotonbeamtherapyhavearoleasacomplementaryoralternativetherapeuticoptionforhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT woosangmyung doesriskadaptedprotonbeamtherapyhavearoleasacomplementaryoralternativetherapeuticoptionforhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT kohyounghwan doesriskadaptedprotonbeamtherapyhavearoleasacomplementaryoralternativetherapeuticoptionforhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT leewoojin doesriskadaptedprotonbeamtherapyhavearoleasacomplementaryoralternativetherapeuticoptionforhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT kimdaeyong doesriskadaptedprotonbeamtherapyhavearoleasacomplementaryoralternativetherapeuticoptionforhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT kimchangmin doesriskadaptedprotonbeamtherapyhavearoleasacomplementaryoralternativetherapeuticoptionforhepatocellularcarcinoma