Cargando…

Euthanasia: Manual versus Mechanical Cervical Dislocation for Broilers

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Poultry are euthanized for several reasons, most commonly because a bird is sick or injured and unable to eat or drink. Euthanasia can be a challenge to perform, especially when birds are heavy, like broiler chickens (produced for meat). Manual cervical dislocation (CD), or “breaking...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacobs, Leonie, Bourassa, Dianna V., Harris, Caitlin E., Buhr, R. Jeff
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30717297
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9020047
_version_ 1783401276683321344
author Jacobs, Leonie
Bourassa, Dianna V.
Harris, Caitlin E.
Buhr, R. Jeff
author_facet Jacobs, Leonie
Bourassa, Dianna V.
Harris, Caitlin E.
Buhr, R. Jeff
author_sort Jacobs, Leonie
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Poultry are euthanized for several reasons, most commonly because a bird is sick or injured and unable to eat or drink. Euthanasia can be a challenge to perform, especially when birds are heavy, like broiler chickens (produced for meat). Manual cervical dislocation (CD), or “breaking the neck”, is the most commonly applied method, but can be challenging. Therefore, using a tool (the mechanical method) such as the Koechner Euthanizing Device (KED) could be an alternative. Here, we aimed to compare CD with KED application for their impact on duration of induced reflexes and time to brain death. We assessed loss of brain stem reflexes, which indicate deep unconsciousness and/or brain stem death, and cessation of musculoskeletal movements. We applied both methods (CD and KED) to 200 broilers of 36, 42, or 43 days old on 3 experimental days. On days 2 and 3 an additional method was added, in which the bird’s head was extended at a ~90° angle after the application of the KED (KED+). Our study indicated brain stem death occurred sooner when birds were euthanized with CD compared to KED or KED+; all reflex durations were sustained for longer in the KED and KED+ birds. ABSTRACT: The aim was to assess the onset of brain stem death for two euthanasia methods—manual cervical dislocation (CD) versus the Koechner Euthanizing Device (KED). Over three days broilers of 36 (n = 60), 42 (n = 80), or 43 days old (n = 60) were euthanized. On days 2 and 3, a treatment was added in which the bird’s head was extended at a ~90° angle after application of the KED (KED+). On those days, gap size was recorded between the skull and atlas vertebra by 1-cm increments. The onset of brain death was assessed by recording the nictitating membrane reflex, gasping reflex and musculoskeletal movements (sec). Additionally, skin damage and blood loss were recorded (y/n). On all days, CD resulted in quicker loss of reflexes and movements compared to KED or KED+. Reflexes returned in 0–15% of CD birds, 50–55% of KED birds, and 40–60% of KED+ birds, possibly regaining consciousness. Skin damage occurred in 0% of CD birds, 68–95% of KED birds, and 85–95% of KED+ birds. On day 2 (p = 0.065) and 3 (p = 0.008), KED birds had or tended to have a narrower skull-to-atlas gap compared to CD and KED+ birds. Based on our results, CD would be the recommended method for broilers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6406331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64063312019-03-08 Euthanasia: Manual versus Mechanical Cervical Dislocation for Broilers Jacobs, Leonie Bourassa, Dianna V. Harris, Caitlin E. Buhr, R. Jeff Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Poultry are euthanized for several reasons, most commonly because a bird is sick or injured and unable to eat or drink. Euthanasia can be a challenge to perform, especially when birds are heavy, like broiler chickens (produced for meat). Manual cervical dislocation (CD), or “breaking the neck”, is the most commonly applied method, but can be challenging. Therefore, using a tool (the mechanical method) such as the Koechner Euthanizing Device (KED) could be an alternative. Here, we aimed to compare CD with KED application for their impact on duration of induced reflexes and time to brain death. We assessed loss of brain stem reflexes, which indicate deep unconsciousness and/or brain stem death, and cessation of musculoskeletal movements. We applied both methods (CD and KED) to 200 broilers of 36, 42, or 43 days old on 3 experimental days. On days 2 and 3 an additional method was added, in which the bird’s head was extended at a ~90° angle after the application of the KED (KED+). Our study indicated brain stem death occurred sooner when birds were euthanized with CD compared to KED or KED+; all reflex durations were sustained for longer in the KED and KED+ birds. ABSTRACT: The aim was to assess the onset of brain stem death for two euthanasia methods—manual cervical dislocation (CD) versus the Koechner Euthanizing Device (KED). Over three days broilers of 36 (n = 60), 42 (n = 80), or 43 days old (n = 60) were euthanized. On days 2 and 3, a treatment was added in which the bird’s head was extended at a ~90° angle after application of the KED (KED+). On those days, gap size was recorded between the skull and atlas vertebra by 1-cm increments. The onset of brain death was assessed by recording the nictitating membrane reflex, gasping reflex and musculoskeletal movements (sec). Additionally, skin damage and blood loss were recorded (y/n). On all days, CD resulted in quicker loss of reflexes and movements compared to KED or KED+. Reflexes returned in 0–15% of CD birds, 50–55% of KED birds, and 40–60% of KED+ birds, possibly regaining consciousness. Skin damage occurred in 0% of CD birds, 68–95% of KED birds, and 85–95% of KED+ birds. On day 2 (p = 0.065) and 3 (p = 0.008), KED birds had or tended to have a narrower skull-to-atlas gap compared to CD and KED+ birds. Based on our results, CD would be the recommended method for broilers. MDPI 2019-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6406331/ /pubmed/30717297 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9020047 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jacobs, Leonie
Bourassa, Dianna V.
Harris, Caitlin E.
Buhr, R. Jeff
Euthanasia: Manual versus Mechanical Cervical Dislocation for Broilers
title Euthanasia: Manual versus Mechanical Cervical Dislocation for Broilers
title_full Euthanasia: Manual versus Mechanical Cervical Dislocation for Broilers
title_fullStr Euthanasia: Manual versus Mechanical Cervical Dislocation for Broilers
title_full_unstemmed Euthanasia: Manual versus Mechanical Cervical Dislocation for Broilers
title_short Euthanasia: Manual versus Mechanical Cervical Dislocation for Broilers
title_sort euthanasia: manual versus mechanical cervical dislocation for broilers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30717297
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9020047
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobsleonie euthanasiamanualversusmechanicalcervicaldislocationforbroilers
AT bourassadiannav euthanasiamanualversusmechanicalcervicaldislocationforbroilers
AT harriscaitline euthanasiamanualversusmechanicalcervicaldislocationforbroilers
AT buhrrjeff euthanasiamanualversusmechanicalcervicaldislocationforbroilers